ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of On Liberty By John Mill

1817 Words8 Pages

Thomas Cahill Professor Jason Gardner Present Moral Problems 2 May 2024 Objecting Mill: The Optimal Use of Freedom of Speech In “On Liberty” by John Mill, the author discusses the implications of free speech. Mill argues that free speech should never be infringed upon, as the opinion being spoken provides a great benefit to humanity by encouraging discussion. However, is there a limit to which an opinion can benefit humanity? I argue that there are instances where free speech should be infringed upon. There are statements that are so morally repulsive or objectively incorrect that, when spoken, humanity derives no benefit from it. Knowing what these statements are or the scenarios that they occur in would provide utility for humanity, as we can rid mankind of items that provide no utility …show more content…

While freedom of speech should rarely be limited, there are instances in which opinions generate threats towards individuals within a society. These opinions are currently being punished, but they continue to occur at high rates. It follows that with tougher punishment, we can deter this action from occurring. When we omit these opinions from our freedom of speech, it provides the harsher consequences needed to deter others. Furthermore, it provides the greatest benefit to society, as it still encourages dialogue around controversial topics, only excluding those in which the harm of the idea being spoken is greater than the benefit it provides. Overall, we can use this argument to determine how to optimize the benefit of dialogue around controversial topics by not allowing these conversations to occur when the results will be detrimental to society. Overall, Mill’s argument is correct in that free speech should not be infringed upon in many instances. However, opinions that threaten another individual do not provide benefit and should be inhibited in any way

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Derek Bok's Free Me: Racist Speech

967 Words | 4 Pages

After mentioning why racist speech is wrong, Lawrence comments “I also have a deeply felt apprehension about the resurgence of racial violence and the corresponding rise in the incidence of verbal and symbolic assault and harassment to which blacks and other traditionally subjected and excluded groups are subjected”(72). Putting emphasis on how racist actions hurt others is important for the reader to comprehend. Furthermore, the idea of free speech “reinforces our society’s commitment to tolerance as a value”(71). Gives choices to each individual to decide who and what they stand for, no more pandering and watching what others do. As a result, free speech brings community together as a whole.

Read More

Framers Contribution Of The First Amendment To The United States Constitution

1049 Words | 5 Pages

To make sure that the constitution's protections continue to be strong and accessible, legislators and legal experts would need to have open discussions as the limits of free speech are challenged in new circumstances. The challenge of maintaining and updating the constitutional protections in an age of misinformation is finding an appropriate balance between supporting free speech and preventing harm without going too far in either direction or using censorship. As time goes on, society changes and new protections and limits can be brought into law by legislators in the Congress and the House of Representatives, as long as the rights brought by the amendment are still

Read More

Summary Of When States Try To Take Away Americans Freedom Of Thought

714 Words | 3 Pages

The passage “When States Try to Take Away Americans’ Freedom of Thought,” highlights the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America. The article discusses how government regulations, concerning boycotts and diversity initiatives, can infringe upon individuals' rights to freedom of expression. The editorial argues against laws restricting speech and expression, advocating for the protection of constitutional rights. Additionally, the passage warns against the dangers of censorship and the potential consequences of limiting free speech on college campuses and beyond by informing the readers with various real-life examples and quotes. Because the article utilizes various references to support the theme of the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America, referential purpose is employed, along with, evaluation and description patterns.

Read More

John Stuart Mill's Argumentative Essay

1224 Words | 5 Pages

Whether it is at the dinner table or in my family’s group text message, the conversation about my brother’s custody battle with my mother’s side of the family seems to remain a bitter topic, especially when discussing my role in it. When my father physically harmed my brother to the extent to which he had to go to the emergency room, the custody trial over my brother and me began. After several sources provided the judge with accusations against my father, I was the final source that needed to assert or deny my father’s abuse; with heavy consideration, I decided to lie to the judge by denying my father’s abuse. Under the principle of utilitarianism, philosophers would infer that lying is permissible if the consequences of doing so are good.

Read More

Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel

912 Words | 4 Pages

While contrasting opinions should be allowed, there has to be a line that can determine the differences between expressing opinions or influencing negative thoughts on others. However, once the specifications have been put on the expression of ideas, a citizen should still be able to find their freedom of speech as “the most cherished founding principle of the nation’s identity” (Gaudefroy 1). Rules should not restrict a group's efforts to defy unjustifiable laws. Our freedom of speech has to continue to be an important resource that is available to all citizens. Failure to comply with the citizen’s ideas would create

Read More

Walter Lippmann's The Indispensable Opposition

319 Words | 2 Pages

“Thus, the defense of freedom of opinion tends to rest not on its substantial, beneficial, and indispensable consequences…” (Line ) Lippmann uses these specific words to show readers that the freedom of opinion is of considerable importance, favorable, advantageous,

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr.'s Sorrowful Letter From Birmingham Jail

1626 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout the ages, the pursuit of freedom has established our social, political, and legal environments, serving as the main force behind society’s development. In a democracy, the right to free speech, the press, and religion serve as foundations for open debate and as defenses against despotism. Not only have these liberties created the growth of civil rights, but they are also a necessity that enables people to voice their opinions and critically evaluate the acts of the government. The fundamental right to freedom of speech is recognized as one of the primary liberties for the operation of a free and open society. The value of free speech cannot be overstated since it guarantees that all opinions, no matter how well-liked or disliked,

Read More

Analysis Of Walter Lippman's The Indispensable Opposition

449 Words | 2 Pages

The freedoms of men and women are guaranteed under law, yet somehow we tell eachother that our speech is incorrect and should be looked down upon. How can the liberties of other people be less valuable than than your own? Americans tend to simply push an opposing opinion out of their way, deeming it invaluable and useless, but when someone does that same thing to them, they are up in arms about their right to free speech. Walter Lippman uses powerful pathos and strong diction in his article The Indispensable Opposition to develop his argument that individuals must respect and listen to other’s opinions in order for society to grow as a whole. People’s emotions are always hard to decipher and angle so that their opinion is altered, or even changed.

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More

Should Justice Douglas Ban The Definition Of Obscenity?

261 Words | 2 Pages

It is not rational to allow governments to ban certain expressions because they are not appealing to some people. If such an act is allowed, than freedom of speech and press guaranteed by the 1st Amendment becomes useless, and that every material could be banned based on this test. People cannot be punished for expressing their views just because those views might not be appealing to some judge or jury (O`Brien, 508).

Read More

The Giver Censorship Analysis

1658 Words | 7 Pages

In many ways, though, its the very basis of the First Amendment: You may disagree with what Im saying, but you may not silence my voice. Even when I'm calling you a bad name; even if what I say is not “politically correct” (Stevenson). In this statement Stevenson is implying the direct meaning of the First Amendment by stating that disagreements and censorship of phrases or knowledge is silencing the voice of an individual. Censorship is very dependent on an individuals perspective. On my circumstances individuals will be angered because people’s opinions, ideas, and works are being limited due to others disapproval.

Read More

The Indispensable Opposition Analysis

289 Words | 2 Pages

In the article, “The Indispensable Opposition,” author, Walter Lippmann, argues his claim that we must view the freedom of oppositions as a way to improve our decisions in a democratic society rather than just tolerating that freedom of speech. When freedom of speech is tolerated and only seen as a right to speak, Lippmann believes that the liberty of opinion becomes a luxury. Moving forward, Lippmann then states that we must understand that the freedom of speech for our opponents are a vital necessity since it provides our own opinions to grow in improvement. Through practical experience, we realize we need the freedom of opposition and is no longer just our opponent ’s right.

Read More

Freedom Of Speech: The Case Of The Charlie Hebdo Shootings

1685 Words | 7 Pages

Mill’s statements on the freedom of speech is what I will rely on for my argument. Mill’s view on the freedom of speech is still relevant today because he does not take the view that there shouldn’t be any freedom of speech, but that it should be limited at certain times and this issue is very relevant in today’s society. Mill states a bold statement in the footnote at the beginning of Chapter II of On Liberty, in defence of the freedom of speech ‘If the arguments of the present chapter are of any validity, there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered’. Mill clearly is in the defence of the freedom of speech here because this liberty has to exist with everything so that we have ‘absolute freedom of

Read More

Violence In The United States Essay

1569 Words | 7 Pages

Plagued by violence, the United States constantly suffers through perpetual brutalities. As one of the leading causes of death, it generates more than 1.6 million casualties worldwide every year. Acts of violence are often highly publicized, which has led citizens to believe that the nation’s violence problem is getting progressively worse. However, since the 1990s crime and death rates due to violence have decreased.

Read More

John Stuart Mill's View On Freedom: A Definition Of Freedom

1119 Words | 5 Pages

Being Free 1st draft Freedom is word used in a lot of contexts, but the official meaning of the word is “the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants” (Freedom). Meaning that you have the right to do something, with the focus being on you as an individual. This means no one can tell you what to do, like for example a state. This is an important aspect and part of political theory. Liberty is also used and viewed as the same category of theory, and has the definition “The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views” (Liberty).

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of On Liberty By John Mill

Open Document