ipl-logo

Summary Of When States Try To Take Away Americans Freedom Of Thought

714 Words3 Pages

The passage “When States Try to Take Away Americans’ Freedom of Thought,” highlights the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America. The article discusses how government regulations, concerning boycotts and diversity initiatives, can infringe upon individuals' rights to freedom of expression. The editorial argues against laws restricting speech and expression, advocating for the protection of constitutional rights. Additionally, the passage warns against the dangers of censorship and the potential consequences of limiting free speech on college campuses and beyond by informing the readers with various real-life examples and quotes. Because the article utilizes various references to support the theme of the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America, referential purpose is employed, along with, evaluation and description patterns. Moreover, “When States Try to Take Away Americans’ Freedom of Thought” is referential because of how …show more content…

The article describes various instances where states have imposed restrictions on speech in educational settings, such as the "Stop WOKE" law in Florida and the mandates imposed by California's community college system. Through detailed descriptions of the policies and the implications, the article provides readers with a clear understanding of the challenges facing free speech in academic environments. Moreover, the article describes efforts by certain institutions to enforce diversity, equity, and inclusion principles, including requiring statements of personal commitment to the stated principles from new employees. The description utilized helps paint a vivid picture of free speech restrictions and the restrictions potential impact on academic freedom and diverse

Show More
Related
160 Words | 1 Pages

Charles R. Lawrence III is a professor at Georgetown University that publicized an article inside “The Chronicle of Higher Education” and later on in the “Duke Law Journal” which was headlined “On Racist Speech”. Ever since Charles Lawrence was young he was quite the anarchist on the matter of the first amendment protecting racial slurs. He encourages University’s to stand up and reprimand such absurd speech with a reinforced approach without completely throwing out the first amendments rights. Charles Lawrence uses Brown v. the board of education as an example, the discrimination is causing psychological effects that are turning an educational environment into an environment of destruction. As he then goes on to explain that if racial speech

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Infringement of the Freedom of Expression Posed with the question, “why is the University of Chicago associated with so many winners of the nobel prize-- 90 in all”, university president, Robert Zimmer responded, that “the key was a campus culture committed to ‘discourse, argument, and lack of deference.’” sparking him to analyze this deeper Zimmer noticed that, “while chinese academics have made strides to ‘inject more argumentation and challenge into their education,’ their American peers are moving ‘in the opposite direction.’ As universities go, so ultimately go the fate of nations”. This idea closely correlates with the arguments about freedom of expression presented in the articles, Student Speech Should Not Be Censored and Employees

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

which means students on campuses also have the right to share their personal opinion especial at an educational facility where they are paying to attend ! students pay so much to attend college and universities , they invest their time and they usually also go in debt just to get their education . the least they can get in return is the basic right (freedom) to express their feelings towards certain things on campus

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

The use of ‘bastions of unbridled inquiry and expression’ (774) creates an image of a fortified and well-defended area that in this case was a safe place to explore possibilities and voice one's opinions. To have in the same sentence ‘..repress free speech as any other institution in young people’s lives’ Immediately takes what may have looked like something promising and turns it into yet another governed establishment that is more interested in total compliance than individual creativity. Speech codes were birthed in the 1980s as the result of ‘political correctness’ melding with the concerns of the somewhat controversial ‘nonfaculty campus administrators.’ Lukianoff’s explanation about why these stringent codes violate the constitutional right to freedom of speech is sharply defined with the phrase ‘...well intended but, outside of the ivory tower…’ (774) Ivory tower meaning a state of seclusion from the facts of the real world.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

The authors goes on to say that most student would not risk their career or their freedom, on the alter of free expression. Therefore, they would avoid hot button and taboo subjects that would effect them. The Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, Supreme Court, has distingish a balance between unpleasant speech and truly harassing verbal bahavior. The Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, Supreme Court, defines harassment as so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it can damage or take away educational opportunities. Silverglate and Creeley argues that the proposed legislation definition of harassment is flawed because it does not enforce “objectively offensive” which determines what speech qualifies as harassment or any mention of “hostile or abusive eduacational environment” leaving the administrators to judge whwther the speech is hostile or

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Freedom of Speech Across the United States, there is controversy over speech codes set in place on several college campuses for the reasons to protect student’s emotional stability and from speech they view as hateful. Speech codes do not only infringe upon our first amendment right, but are a dereliction of the Founding Father’s original purpose and intention for the country. Although the First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, there is a difference between freedom of speech and using your right to shut others down. Colleges across the US are infringing students’ rights by implementing speech codes.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

All faculty members lose their academic freedom in a dictatorship, as faculty members did in Nazi Germany. The guarantees academic freedom offered were also widely abandoned in the United States during the 1950s, in the long postwar inquisition that culminated in the McCarthy period. As Ellen Schrecker demonstrates in No Ivory Tower, many progressive faculty members lost their jobs during this period and none were able to speak freely without fear of punishment. Academic freedom must thus be relearned and defended

Read More
1514 Words | 7 Pages

Shiell, the author of “Campus Hate Speech on Trial,” opposes speech codes on campus and insists the importance of a university to “distinguish genuine harassment from mere offensiveness” (169). In order to achieve equality, a university must adopt “educational and economic measures” instead of imposing punishments due to the fact that educating has a better result in the long run (169). Also, universities must make sure that due process rights are under the protection, meaning that you might not be sinful although you are accused of disobeying speech regulations (169). Shiell believes that universities should come up with some policies that are concentrated on conduct rather than speech since speech is tolerable but not the action (169). Even if a university must set up rules to regulate, it should regulate speech that is a “targeted, intentional, repeated verbal abuse serving no legitimate academic purpose” (171).

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

Free Speech on Campus by Nat Hentoff is an interesting article in which Hentoff tries to prove that free speech is not on all college campuses. In the essay Hentoff uses examples such as fliers, professors, and guest speakers to get his point across. Hentoff says, “how are they going to learn to identify and cope with them” (para. 10), this to tell us about the protection of students from bad ideas. These attempts to protect are taking away from their first amendment. Hentoff feels that we should allow them to choose what ideas are bad.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

But the censorship of free speech on college campuses doesn’t just harm students’ abilities to deal with differing opinions; it teaches college students that those differing opinions should be silenced. College students have been indoctrinated into believing that speech which offends them, hurts their feelings, or makes them feel “unsafe” is not protected by the First Amendment. And these students consider any viewpoint which substantially differs from their own as “unsafe”. When these students enter the real world they find that people

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Students must be able to express their beliefs without a fear of being retaliated

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

We may not know we are being led to the slaughter when certain restrictions on free speech are proposed, but the founder of this nation disagrees. Even though some expression may be offensive, content-based

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

(Hentoff, 2011) Even today, colleges and universities have begun a systematic campaign of replacing free speech with safe spaces, and the dreaded trigger warnings. Once pinnacles of higher learning designed to prepare students for careers and adult life, many colleges and universities have now, due to pressure from the students, become centers for suppression and infantile reactions to simple problems. One example of censorship demanded by the students, and facilitated by the administration, is at Emory University. In March of 2016, political slogans supporting Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump, appeared in chalk on sidewalks and stair rails across campus.

Read More

More about Summary Of When States Try To Take Away Americans Freedom Of Thought

Open Document