ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Notre Dame Vs Klan

629 Words3 Pages

right to access information taken from him and he was also threatened and criticized for reading a book that wasn’t harmful to him or to society, the name of the book is “Notre Dame VS. The Klan “and just because he was a Caucasian man people were quick to judge. He said that “You can tell me you don’t like the book, but you cannot tell me I can read it … “meaning, anyone can share their opinion about it but it is not acceptable to prevent other people from getting the knowledge they want. And that statement was correct! Everybody has the right to know what is going on around them , it seems as if institutions with higher authority feel that they can hide things and stop individuals from knowing what they don’t want them to know…Let’s not forget what happened in Beijing, China in 1989 . “Tiananmen Square” where all of them students were attacked for protesting, innocent lives were taken just for wanting justice. Is this how we want to end up??! If powerful bodies on university campuses continue to keep fear in the students and prevent them from being able to openly express their selves I’m afraid this may happen. …show more content…

which means students on campuses also have the right to share their personal opinion especial at an educational facility where they are paying to attend ! students pay so much to attend college and universities , they invest their time and they usually also go in debt just to get their education . the least they can get in return is the basic right (freedom) to express their feelings towards certain things on campus

Show More
Related
84 Words | 1 Pages

In the “Bethel School District v. Fraser” case, Fraser believed that the school violated his first amendment “freedom of speech” rights. Fraser gave a speech with some inappropriate content in it and the school gave him a three day suspension because two teachers warned him before he gave the speech. Fraser took it to court and the justices said they would shorten the suspension and let him have his right to speak at graduation because the school was taking away his freedom of speech.

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

As seen in previous cases like Tinker vs. Des Moines, students have the right to political say, unless it causes disruption at school of students are promoting something that goes against the law. In the case of Tinker v Des Moines the students were not promoting anything illegal but showed their thought on the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands (Tinker). Argued in court by Kenneth W. Starr in the Morse v. Frederick case, he gave the idea that the foundation for school censorship was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines (Morse). The Justices responded back saying, that case was a different scenario as the students weren 't doing anything against the law while Frederick was encouraging the use of marijuana which was illegal (Morse).

Read More
143 Words | 1 Pages

Detroit was also experiencing political turmoil. Charles Bowles lost the election only because there was corruption within the Democratic party in Michigan. The Klan was able to put forth such a radical candidate because the politicians in the city before were obnoxiously corrupt and the voters were losing patience. Michigan Klan used this opportunity to gain more influence; they were successful. Michigan was unique because during the progressive era, the state experienced an influx of both Catholic immigrants and Black Americans.

Read More
1395 Words | 6 Pages

This shows how the freedom of speech the students had was good for them in the future and also our community. “An amicus curiae brief filed by the U.S. National Student Association, composed of college student governments said that allowing more freedoms to students would get them ready for college and make them better citizens” (The First Amendment: Tinker v. Des Moines). According to the brief, more freedom equals better community and better college preparation. This helps the students do better. By giving them more freedom it makes a better future community.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

It might take away a person’s ability to speak freely, or keep some books from being written. They wanted people’s rights

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

Since then much has changed, now right and wrong are matters for debate. How do you exactly determine what is right and wrong? Members of the Ku Klux Klan truly believe that whites are superior. Are they wrong for that? Think of a football team that you adore, is it wrong for you to think of that team as the best? No doubt, they are racist.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

(Thane Rosenbaum page 165) And I believe this limit is crucial especially in places of diversity and higher learning such as college campuses. There is a difference between “trying to persuade and trying to injure.” (Rosenbaum page 166) So while many people believe that freedom of speech on a

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances”(Bill of rights). This is the first amendment on the Bill of Rights it will never be taken away from us so we should use it to its full potential. “First, I believe with all my heart that Howard must serve as an institute of learning excellence where freedom of speech is strongly encouraged and rigorously protected”(Powell 502-503). Since people before us had to fight for the right to speak freely we should embrace it and passionately use this right. Institutions such as colleges and university’s shouldn’t just stick to the norm and allow free speech; they should encourage the students and

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

If someone is going to have a conversation with another person, than their freedom of speech should be protected, however; if someone had the sole intentions of causing harm or discomfort to the person that they were speaking with or at, then their freedom of speech may not be so protected. This should be of no concern to any persons on a college campus who are worrying about their right to freedom of speech or expression being neglected, considering that speech codes only work to prevent harm inflicted by hate speech to all students. I agree with Lawrence in that if we are going to end racism, we, as a society, have to take small steps in protecting minority

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine a student put a poster in the school explaining what should be changed about the dress code, but the administration quickly tore down the sign because they did not like what it said. The first amendment in the constitution says that “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble… ” It is appropriate for a public school to limit what a student can say when the expression is not peaceful, when the message is harmful to others, and if the demonstration is a disruption to learning. To begin, a public schools should be able to limit what a student can say if it is a violent demonstration. For example, the article, “Do Students Still Have Free Speech in School?”, by David R. Wheeler states “... schools can punish any speech as long as they can cite “intimidation.” Intimidation is not a form of peacefulness and should not be tolerated at any school.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

I can’t fully express anything that I want and its due to the security and general welfare of other fellow peers. A lot of class work has to be censored and cant be used for the sole purpose of education. We too, students, are persons under the American Constitution . So so this extent, i can say that our government has altered the first amendment.

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

In The United States of America, people are fortunate enough to have the right to speak their minds to produce deep, extensive, and meaningful conversations. These public expressions, whether in groups of people, one-on-one conversations, or on social media, can allow people to expand their political, economic, and social views of the world. Social media platforms and public speaking supplies the opportunity for people to communicate and articulate their views freely. Colleges should not be allowed to expel students for articulating their opinions on social media as the ability to generate free speech is a First Amendment right, can allow students to express themselves and their ideas, and uncensored opinions advance the ideals of The United States.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Notre Dame Vs Klan

Related Topics

Open Document