ipl-logo

Freedom Of Speech Should Be Limited Essay

1761 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Disadvantage of freedom of expression

The United States of America is known for it’s freedom of expression, whereas in other countries it is heavily restricted. It’s very valuable to the country’s reputation because not every country has the right to freedom of speech. As a result, some Americans feel that they can say whatever they desire. The question is whether we classify freedom of speech as a problem is becoming a very debated topic. People are taking advantage of the first amendment. As time continues hate speech is growing in popularity across the states. With the first amendment protecting the Americans who use hate speech, it’s becoming offensive to gay people the amount of hate being used. America prides itself on expression, however, it has become an issue when hate …show more content…

It has been said that hate speech is just another form of expressing feelings. This argument highlights how the United States of America is a place of expression without limits. LGBT members can even come out and learn to build from any negativity. People have a right to exercise the first amendment however they want. Those who speak more freely have a better chance at allowing others to express themselves. If there are restrictions it would be more difficult for the first amendment to still be established. For example, in a University it would be hard to stop hate speech, when it is considered a place to speak freely. According to the Huffington Post, “About 78 percent of students surveyed said that colleges should allow “all types of speech and viewpoints,” while 22 percent noted that “colleges should prohibit biased or offensive speech in the furtherance of a positive learning environment(Fang).” Banning hate speech wouldn’t solve anything especially on a college campus. Most college students found it more effective to get rid of hate speech rules. It will serve people better if there isn’t any boundaries. Citizens are exposed to hate speech everywhere. Why create more rules for people to break? It shouldn’t be restricted anywhere, even a college campus. This is another way to see how other people identify with things. If that’s limited it will make it more difficult for individuals to communicate, especially when most people don’t listen to given

Show More
Related
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Whether laws intend to limit the offensive power of a minority or protect a minority from attacks, either way rights are lost. In the words of Roger Baldwin, founder of the civil liberties union, “In order to defend the people you like, you have to defend the people you hate.” Roger Baldwin’s statement indicates that if we limit the free speech of one group we ultimately limit our own freedoms. The first Amendment clearly states the limiting of any groups right is unconstitutional, “make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” The basis behind not allowing the government to define free speech allows Americans to create their own social order and among themselves determine what is acceptable.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

The passage “When States Try to Take Away Americans’ Freedom of Thought,” highlights the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America. The article discusses how government regulations, concerning boycotts and diversity initiatives, can infringe upon individuals' rights to freedom of expression. The editorial argues against laws restricting speech and expression, advocating for the protection of constitutional rights. Additionally, the passage warns against the dangers of censorship and the potential consequences of limiting free speech on college campuses and beyond by informing the readers with various real-life examples and quotes. Because the article utilizes various references to support the theme of the importance of preserving freedom of expression and open debate in universities and society across America, referential purpose is employed, along with, evaluation and description patterns.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Currently, the United State’s criterion on Speech includes, “obscenity, fraud, child pornography, harassment, incitement to illegal conduct and imminent lawless action, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising, copyright or patent rights” (Gaudefroy 3). However, speech involving discriminatory words or racial intentions are protected by the law. To avoid instances that degrade the minority group, stricter rules need to be enforced on the delicate topic. Restrictions on hate speech should include usage of “misogynistic, homophobic, racist, and conspiracy-laden language” (Gaudefroy 3). Efforts to restrict these types of beliefs would create a more safe and equal society for all individuals.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Shown in organizations and events across America, such as the white supremacists in Charlottesville, who express their controversial beliefs, but the freedom of speech also applies to them. The freedom of speech applies to everyone as a human right, “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression” (United Nations). As stated previously, these people are now outliers in our modern society as laws that restricted human rights have been abolished, but there are also other human rights issues within America. However, the solution of these problems is from changing the mind of individuals and not the nation’s

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The first Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution that protects the citizens freedom of expression. According to Source 1, the rights rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution are freedom of speech, religion, Press, assembly and petition. However, there have been times when the First Amendment has been restricted. In source 4, the Supreme Court case in Des Moines, lowa Mary Beth Tinker,13, her older brother and a friend wore black armbands white peace sings to their schools from of protest against the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam war school officials told to the students to remove their armbands, they refused and were suspended Student sued the school district. This shows that.

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

It would to wrong to assume the use of our freedom of speech has never been used to cause emotional and mental harm to others. Many people are troubled as to what qualifies as hate speech and what does not. Hate speech is the grey line in allowed and not allowed by society. The point to be made is that society has placed a feeling of, frowned upon when hate speech is mentioned. There are many forms for which hate speech can be addressed.

Read More
107 Words | 1 Pages

In my interpretation of the First Amendment, the rights of the people to freely express their opinions, even if unpopular, is clearly protected. Specifically, hate speech is not clearly defined and may differ between people. Individuals and groups can disagree on if specific issues may be considered hateful. Advocates of, what some may consider as hate speech, will likely disagree that their opinions on an issue would be considered hate speech. Protecting all speech, including hate speech, should only imply that the government is following the first amendment to not interfere or be prejudice against anyone expressing their opinions if done so with regard to other laws.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Many people believe that the First Amendment gives the people right to say whatever they want but it’s not true. There is no hate speech exception to First Amendment. There are some kind of words which are not protected especially the fighting or insulting words or speech in which a person threatens to commit a crime that would result in death, serious injury, or damage is not protected by the First Amendment, instead First Amendment gives the right to fight against injustice, inequality and unfairness. For example Black Lives Matter movement, this movement has every right to express their feelings. The ways they are protesting are protected under the First Amendment.

Read More
168 Words | 1 Pages

I believe freedom of speech should not be limited. Nowhere in the constitution does it give the government the right to limit our freedoms ,that act is truly unconstitutional. If we let them limit our freedoms then that gives them the power to limit little by little until it 's eventually all gone. The people should not be suppressed they should be allowed to put forth their opinions and speak against anything they feel isn 't right. the constitution states that you can say whatever you want as long as it does not include anything profine, or violent.

Read More
2919 Words | 12 Pages

Free speech is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America. This right is particularly important on college campuses where free and open exchange of ideas is essential for the intellectual growth of students and the advancement of education and knowledge. However, in recent years, speech codes have been implemented on many college and university campuses in an attempt to regulate speech and create a more inclusive environment. While these policies may have been introduced with good intentions, they have unintended consequences, including self-censorship and cancel culture. Exploring the impact of free speech codes as policies on college campuses dives deeper into understanding how they can lead to things

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

Although hate speech is bigoted, hate-mongering, and can potentially lead to hate crimes, it should still be considered free speech. If citizens of the United States are not allowed to be verbal about their beliefs, whether or not they are offensive and hateful, then there is no use in allowing free speech. Placing limitations on free speech contradicts the First Amendment, therefore making it inaccurate and useless.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment free speech rights are not absolute. Freedom of speech includes the right which protected and simultaneously, the rights that are not protected. The rights which are protected such as right not to speak (1943), the right of students – to wear black armbands to school to protest a war (1969), to use certain offensive words and phrases to convey political messages (1971), to contribute money (1976), to advertise commercial products and professional services (1977), and to engage in symbolic speeches (1990). In the other hand, the rights which are not actually protected in free speech contains; inciting actions that would harm others (1919), making or distributing obscene materials (1957), bumming draft cards as an anti-war protest (1967), permitting students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration, of students to make an obscene speech at school-sponsored event and of students, to advocate illegal drug use at a school-sponsored event. To sum up, the first amendment of the United States of America is the most significant amendment to the maintenance of a democratic government since it states important issues like freedom of religion, freedom of speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the government.

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

Our own country is basically threatening ourselves from the freedom of speech and should encourage everyone to express themselves without punishment. This is not necessarily an issue that can be resolved, but it needs to be made publicized and be made aware of. Too much of society are triggered by a simple few words they may come across when scrolling a timeline. Social media is an influential and high powered tool that’s forced a new lifestyle. We must make ourselves and others comfortable with expressing themselves while handling criticism to ensure protection of our freedom of

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

Free speech and hate speech can be classified as different topics and when arguing for one, we can also criticize the other. Free expression and free speech on campuses are crucial for sparking important conversations about equality and social justice, and the suspension of free speech and expression may have dire consequences on college campuses. First, freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views, while also allowing students with common beliefs to align. Free speech and the call for free speech allows those who have been historically systematically oppressed to use their voice.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

As a coin has two sides, Hate speech law has also positive impact and bad impact like adversely affect on social attitudes, violate the freedom of speech and psychological harm. We should not try to stop hate speech law but we have to continue trying to minimize causing harm to other = = =

Read More

More about Freedom Of Speech Should Be Limited Essay

Open Document