ipl-logo

Freedom Of Speech Vs. Truth Telling

3958 Words16 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Freedom of media

1 – Introduction
A- Identification of Ethical Problem
The ethical dilemma is freedom of speech vs. truth-telling. Freedom of speech and expression is important in the media because it strongly ensures that there is democracy. Freedom of speech gives any media practitioner the right to freely express what he or she thinks about a certain topic or a certain person. In expression of one’s opinion, he or she does not find the urge to protect the reputation of the company or person or product they are talking about. While any media practitioner is expressing his views and opinions, he or she may be violating the reputation of the subject they are talking about. Therefore, as a media practitioner is expression his opinion about a person or a product …show more content…

Along with freedom of speech comes increased criticism and false truths. Issues are raised about relevance of opinion if its insulting the subjects. Opposing claims are done about the significance of freedom of speech and the value of truth-telling. According to Hadley (1989), journalists must preserve the liberties associated with freedom of the press, considering all viewpoints even those critical of one’s own (p. 249-264). He also states that even though journalists can express their viewpoints freely, they should prevent offensiveness and rudeness and they should never make any decision that would affect their truthfulness. Freedom of expression is essential in the media because it is a strong indication that there is democracy but it should not pass the extent of rudeness. According to Haridakis (1999), there is a difference between freely expression your opinion and unethical commentator behavior such as delivering information with knowledge, escorted by opinion without explanation and soothsaying without heed of consequences (p. 230). Journalists’ role in the media is to educate the public with facts and leave them to make a decision based on these facts without ruining the reputation of the subjects included. There should be a better understand of the appropriate balance between the right to freedom of expression and the need to protect reputations (Boyle, 2000). When a journalist is facing any ethical dilemma, he or she should go with truth-telling. Truth telling indicates that information is reported accurately, objectively and unbiased. According to Cohen-Almagor (2008), the different dimensions of objective reporting that are associated with the concept of objectivity are accuracy, truthfulness, fairness and moral neutrality (p. 136 – 155). Journalists should be concerned

Show More
Related
567 Words | 3 Pages

Howard A. Myrick is a journalism professor at Temple University. His article The Search for Objectivity in Journalism describe the lack of objectivity when it is disseminating. Media workers usually want to present news objectively. But what media workers want to present is different from what they present plus what readers understand is usually different from what social media workers present. So, what readers understand is not equal to the truth in the end.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Without freedom of the press discussions cannot reach a wider audience, debate is obstructed,

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Media that could reflect the real America should be based on diversity of views, pluralism of opinion as the American society. First of all, when someone provides the truth of the actual situation, that person is automatically called a “whistle blower”. There are not many of those people, which are willing to expose all secrets that would benefit the society by finding out the actual story. As Goldberg elaborates in his insider book, danger is a big risk factor to them, losing a job for example, takes a lot of courage or foolishness to do that. Goldberg states that it should be normal common sense for the media give accurate information, which surprisingly does not happened in

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

Have you ever listened to a news story and thought it sounded one-sided? Or have you thought the news didn't seem to report the whole story or the most important aspect of a story? Journalists possess the power to influence a whole group of people with their work. When writers input their opinion, they generate bias. Consecutively, this influences a reader's reaction to a topic.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

There are tons of advice on how to complete a research analysis essay, but I will review the most important ones. To start off with for a research analysis essay there needs to be a lot of reading and research done. A couple of hours each day is needed when finding the right sources. Making sure the resources are appropriate sources. Also making sure ideas are synthesize.

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

In a democracy, freedom of speech and the press must be accorded great respect, but other values such as national security, the protection of reputation or public safety sometimes conflict with First Amendment guarantees. Discuss the approaches that have been used by the Supreme Court to define the limits on expression. How have these approaches been applied in specific cases? Several restrictions have been formulated on expression.

Read More
244 Words | 1 Pages

In chapter 10 of Everyone’s an Author, the main idea is that when writing a report, you must present facts, but not your own opinions as facts. The chapter emphasizes that, when writing a report, it is important to present information in an unbiased, factual manner, even if doing so may prove to be difficult. To summarize, the chapter’s main purpose is to offer instructions on writing an objective and credible report. First, a writer must determine what type of report they are writing – be it for an academic field, for media, or even a community. After identifying the media type you will be writing for, the chapter then suggests reviewing a list of characteristics their report must have.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Media Censorship: Good or bad? On the last decades, the freedom of speech has become one of the most discussed and relevant topics inside general population and governments. When it comes to human basic rights, it is clear that the free and open shared of information and communication between all parts plays an important role to ensure a healthy development and progress. However, to think that every country will be willing to spread all kinds of ideas and opinions without placing a boundary would be a utopian assumption.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

Hello, It is quite comical how we have gotten to the point of which we are now censoring what we can and cannot wear. It is extremely ludacris. The reason I find it both comical and ludacris is because freedom of expression is a human right. The reason I wear the hat is that I am in support of a Conservative President. I support his Pro-Life stance, his call to a return of Traditional values, his defense of the West, his speech on why we must protect Western Values and our Judeo-Christian heritage, his Muslim ban and his support for Israel.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

For instance, Raphael Cohen-Almador asserts that the media need not stay neutral when values and institutions of democracy are threatened and attacked (Cohen-Almador, 2008). He believes that a person can combine his or her civil position and professional journalism. Simultaneously this statement is debatable and denies the main rules of impartial journalism. Nevertheless, David Brewer from Media helping Media would not agree with such view. In one of his articles for International journalists’ network he says that journalists should “keep their own opinions firmly under wraps” (Brewer,

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

Freedom of Speech Freedom of speech is the freedom all people have, to express what they consider and express any opinions. It is an ability to express our opinions freely without being punished or censored. All people throughout the world are entitled and must have right to freedom of speech. However, how much do we know about freedom of speech: when did it occur? Does every countries have it?

Read More
2798 Words | 12 Pages

A media source which ignores or censors important issues and events severely damages freedom of information. Many modern tabloids, twenty four hour news channels and other mainstream media sources have increasingly been criticized for not conforming to general standards of journalistic integrity. In nations described as authoritarian by most international think-tanks and NGOs media ownership is generally something very close to the complete state control over information in direct or indirect ways. Undesirable consequences which occur due to media imperialism are: • Commercially driven ultra-powerful mass market media is primarily loyal to sponsors i.e. advertisers and government rather than to the public interest.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

An Argumentative Essay on Media Censorship Censorship is a control over unacceptable sources found in all forms of media: such as, newspapers, television, and the Internet. Censorship in the media is to examine all the information found in the media, and deleting or censoring anything that is considered objectionable to the state. Each country controls their own media depending on their religious beliefs, culture and moral ideas. There are many reasons to why censorship of the media is a disadvantage. Governments love to control their nations, and a way of controlling their ideas is by censoring information, which citizens have every human right to access.

Read More
1430 Words | 6 Pages

Public relations practitioners are faced with many challenges when it comes to abiding to the code of ethics in public relations, and making sure that they are accountable to the interest of the community, their clients and employers. In most situations these three groups of people have different expectations, values and beliefs, hence realistically it is very difficult to achieve perfect symmetry. As a result, practitioners are faced with many ethical dilemmas, as the area of ethics is a grey area. The definition of ethics explained by Parsons (2008) stated that public relations ethics is the application of knowledge, understanding and reasoning to questions on what is that right or wrong behaviour in professional practice of public relations.

Read More

More about Freedom Of Speech Vs. Truth Telling

Related Topics

Open Document