ipl-logo

Further Clarification Of The Concept Of Human Dignity Analysis

569 Words3 Pages

Further Clarification of the Concept of Human Dignity The judicial development outlined above significantly clarifies the notion of human dignity that is central to eighth amendment analysis. Other considerations also contribute to a fuller understanding of the application of the cruel and unusual punishment clause to techniques of capital punishment. Justice Brennan has noted that respect for the intrinsic worth of persons is central to the concept of human dignity. A human being is treated as a person when he is permitted to make choices that will determine what will happen to him. Hence, the essence of being a person lies in the notions of individual autonomy and freedom of choice. "If we respect their human dignity, we want people freely to be what they can be and genuinely want to be. Considerations of human dignity must be balanced against the legitimate governmental interests that are furthered by a system of punishment. All punishment necessarily restricts free choice; most offenders would choose to avoid the sanction entirely. At the same time, punishment in effect honors the choice of the criminal because it completes the rational consequences of his act. To the extent that he chooses to commit his criminal act, the law respects his …show more content…

Gregg has established that the capital offender has no eighth amendment right to live past the date set for his execution. Since, however, the offender is entitled to all possible dignity before, and perhaps after, his death, the offender's choices must be respected unless they contradict the purposes of his punishment. His own decisions about how his life is to be terminated should be honored unless it can be shown that those decisions are inconsistent with legitimate state interests. Treatment as a person also includes recognition of the right to

Show More
Related
57 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court ordered that such “deliberate indifference” to an inmate 's “serious medical needs” was a violation of that inmate 's Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. This case guaranteed three basic rights: the right to access to care, the right to care that is ordered, and the right to professional medical judgment.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Georgia. Gregg committed two counts of murder. These murders were also committed alongside an armed robbery of the victims for their money and automobile. All of these factors, along with the murders themselves being horrible and inhumane, make the death penalty, in this case, not a cruel or unusual punishment, and completely constitutional. When their argument of the 8th amendment fails, the petitioners turn to racial discrimination to explain when Leon Gregg was punished by death.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

The issue in this case is whether the imposition of the sentence of death for the crime of murder under the law of Georgia violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg argued that the sentencing procedure allows for arbitrary grants of mercy that reflects a misinterpretation and ignores the reviewing authority of the Georgia Supreme Court to determine whether each death sentence is proportional to other sentencing for similar crimes. Gregg was pleading for a life sentence instead of death. Georgia argued that the statute did not constitute a cruel and unusual punishment and did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Georgia also argued and proved that there must be specific jury findings as to the circumstances of the crime to determine whether the death sentence was fair for the case.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

On November 21, 1973, Troy Leon Gregg and his companion robbed and murdered Fred Edward Simmons and Bob Durwood Moore, two innocent people who were giving them rides. Gregg was convicted for his actions and was given the death penalty. He argued that the sentence was violating his eighth amendment which is “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (U.S. Const. amend. VIII.)

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

Factor X The mix of biotechnology and Factor X can either go one of many ways, positively or negatively. Factor X is the soul of a person, the human dignity of an individual. In “Human Dignity” by Francis Fukuyama, Fukuyama discusses the essence of human nature from both a scientific and a philosophical perspective. Fukuyama describes Factor X as “human essence.”

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Gregg did not agree with his punishment. He believed that the death penalty was a violation of his 8th and 14th amendment right. The 8th amendment protects us from cruel and unusual punishment and Gregg believed this was cruel punishment. The Supreme Court had to decide if his crime deserved the death penalties or if the death penalty violated his rights. Opinion: The decision came out to be 7 to 2.

Read More
1892 Words | 8 Pages

The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United is one of the shortest amendments, but its understanding has caused many debates. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted (). The 1960s brought challenges to the fundamental legality of the death penalty. Before then, the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments were interpreted as permitting the death penalty (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). The eighth Amendment was born from the 1689 English Bill of Rights.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore he should stick to the agreement with the laws like he has always

Read More
341 Words | 2 Pages

Every individual has the right to make their own decisions, it must be assumed that a person has capacity,

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Gregg v. Georgia: Punishable by Death Hunter Alto AP Government-3AB 1-7-18 Many Americans debate over the use of the death penalty as a capital punishment. Some argue that it is inhumane to kill somebody or the form in which they use to kill somebody can be botched making it extremely painful. While others will argue that the death penalty is an adequate punishment for those who have committed a serious crime. As Americans we have many liberties and freedoms which protect us from the government and other people being unusually cruel to us when giving someone a penance for a crime they have committed. This freedom is established in the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which says “Excessive bail shall not be required,

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

I truly believe that it is important to stay human and not become so selfish in the things you are faced with. However, I also believe that if you were to commit and crime or act you should be held accountable for your actions. However that is much easier said than

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

But are we in the future to be prevented from inflicting these punishments because they are cruel? If a more lenient mode of correcting vice and deterring others from the commission of it would be invented, it would be very prudent in the Legislature to adopt it; but until we have some security that this will be done, we ought not to be restrained from making necessary laws by any declaration of this kind’ “ (Bomboy). In other words, Livermore was arguing that all citizens who commit horrible crime do deserve severe punishments for the crimes that they commit, and until the government figures out a way to place restrictions and guidelines on the penalties that we believe are morally proper to give, then they cannot hold back from reprimanding those citizens. Consequently, The Founding Fathers created the Eighth Amendment to be intended for further generations to interpret the meaning of “cruel” and “unusual” over time (Donnell). The amendment was then ratified in 1791 nevertheless, the Eighth Amendment and the death penalty is still highly debated today because the differences in interpretations

Read More
1068 Words | 5 Pages

The Eighth Amendment states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and excessive punishments inflicted”, which overall serves to protect the rights of criminals (source #5). The idea behind the phrase “Cruel and unusual” allows the interpretation of the Eighth Amendment to be significantly more flexible compared to other Amendments to meet the requirements of changing times. Therefore, as time progresses, society reforms its standard of decency, which generally leads to disparities between the views and treatments of offenders from different time periods (Source #4). This principle is prominent when comparing Penry v Lynaugh and Atkins v Virginia. Although both cases deal with mentally disabled offenders who were both charged with murder, the fact that the number of states that banned the execution of disabled offenders had increased from 2 to 18 between the 13 years between the time of these cases, shows the evolution in public opinion, or more specifically, the shift from disregarding a mental state of an offender, to sympathising with how they are not able to feel or understand certain ideas and feelings (Source #3).

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

I was to immediately move across country to live with my strict uncle and his family of six after my parents discovered I had a boyfriend at the age of fifteen. They were afraid I was brainwashed by the American culture. They thought it was best to move us from Phoenix, Arizona to Shelby Township, Michigan to be around people of my ethnicity, mostly my family. I remember crying the entire way there, the tears running down my face began to expose streaks due to the non-water-proof loreal foundation I had on. my father tried to convince me that my destiny was in Michigan.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

In Judith Butler’s essay,” Beside Oneself: On the Limits of Sexual Autonomy,” she attempts to clarify what is considered human and what defines a human, and how it applies to the different gender roles and human rights. The difficulty that this essay presents, however, is its ambiguity – the fact that she fails to clearly identify what a human is and sort of challenges the readers to look within themselves to search for their own interpretation of what they believe gives them their own moral rights and human integrity. Human integrity is a word that can easily be defined when searched for in any dictionary database. “LawCookies.com” defines it as, “the human right to live without being physically harmed or harassed by others. No one can touch,

Read More

More about Further Clarification Of The Concept Of Human Dignity Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document