Galbraith The Triumph Analysis

The Triumph, a novel by John Kenneth Galbraith, proposes a complexing and entertaining idea to provide astounding humor and excellent detail. It takes place in the United States and Puerto Santos during the 1930’s. The city within America is Washington, D.C. in a building in which many high ranking positions regarding politics attempt to sustain the conflicts of government policies. The mood appears to be very confusing for the characters because of conviction and misexpectation. At the beginning of the novel, one would believe President Martinez, a finely-dressed dictator of Puerto Santos, was the main antagonist. Martinez persuaded the reader with this image because of his selfish, uncaring, and unappreciated ways. The reader can all

society. Within all the politicians minds is a different opinion concerning President Martinez. The effect of these thoughts distinguish an argument that confuses which causes them to waste valuable time and fail. Some will say things like, “How could we be serious about supporting a man like Martinez?” (50) which shows that many disagree with reinforcing such an unworthy leader as if he deserves such a title. In other people’s point of view they conclude statements such as, “‘We have to support Martinez, and we know it”’ (51). This means some people still believe that regardless of a dictator’s reputation they must not fall for in which his/her people depend upon. To defend both sides of the argument at hand one must keep in mind that one wrong move can lead into unbearing

As one should have already foreseen, Campbell and other political debaters failed miserably. Communism had taken over. “He had been a communist…” (239). The quote read by the reader shows the reveal of Ryan, the educational overseer of Puerto Santos, had in fact been a communist. They failed mainly because of the fact that they did not see it coming. As the text provides, “They did not expect an early Communist take over…” (212). Thus sincerely proclaims that the people are attempting to stabilize the problem are blinded by the illusion of government policies. In other words, if the government officials of their time had not been so worried about each other's differences involving argumental proclaims and discussions they would have been able to develop a solution to end the troubles faced in the past. Today’s government is very similar to