Within different cultures, members follow a set of strict rules that must be carried out properly when interacting with one another although they are not aware of these unspoken rules. One can become more aware of these actions when he steps out of the procedures set by his culture and behave opposite of what is expected in his culture. The act of behaving in an unexpected manner that is opposite of the norm to elicit a response is known as “Garfinkeling”, named after Harold Garfinkel (Agar, 1994, p.169). By Garfinkeling, I was able to demonstrate how eye contact and the lack of it can disrupt the sign that it carries of paying attention and also interrupt the symbolic system that takes place when asking for assistance. When Michael Agar (1994) speaks of a “sign”, he explains that it is made up of two parts, the “signifier” and the “signified”. The signifier is described as what one sees on the outside, a …show more content…
To initiate this interaction, one student asks another for help in which the student asked can either accept or deny. If the student accepts to help, she explains the concept or helps in any way necessary to better her peer’s understanding of the material. It is expected that the student who asked for help gives his peer his undivided attention as he is requesting a service of another. After the explanation, the student who helped confirms with the student who needed help his understand of the material to ensure there was no misunderstanding. The lack of eye given to the students I asked for help caused a disruption in the system near the end where it was expected that I give my peer my undivided attention. I was paying full attention to the explanations from my classmates, however because of the symbolism that eye contact holds, my classmates were reluctant to believe that I did give them my
Their peers approached each boy in the classroom, so their isolation is not viewed negatively by peers. When approached by peers, they will respond appropriately to the conversation. A request by the boy to a peer or an adult was not observed by either
A Cultural Minefield by William Ecenbarger is an article about how common gestures and customs at home have different meanings in other parts of the world. Ecenbarger has been to six different continents and didn’t realize until years later, that he offended or embarrassed his host during that time. For example Ecenbarger in Australia got into a taxi and jumped into the back seat. The taxi driver spoke to him in voice that made Ecenbarger nervous. In the United States it is a custom that you jump into the back seat whenever asking for a cab.
Moreover, be mindful that my tone and actions have a significant effect on others, and attempt to listen and try to read gestures and body language. A significant insight that was observed from this exercise was that body language plays an important role in an individual’s behavior, which can transcend language and other cultural barriers. The fifth experiential exercise conducted was called “Break the Safe, and was comprised of a board game with 5 teams of 3-5 individuals. The objective of this exercise is to be a member of a group of agents who have 30 minutes to acquire four keys to unlock the safe and stop the countdown.
In Lisa Ko's article, “An American Woman Quits Smiling,” Ko discusses her frustration at being told to smile, even when she didn’t feel like it, which leads her into deciding to stop smiling at people for a day and evaluating people’s reactions. She would only smile if it’s by her own will. The demands to follow a certain practice from the majority connects with the topic of conformity that’s within the field of social psychology. Conformity is the idea that an individual will change in order to fit the norms of a group. It’s consistent with that being obligated to smile sheds light on how cultural expectations will pressure people to follow just a simple act because it’s a good thing and that everyone else is doing it.
Symbols, the meaningful representations that we constantly come across throughout our lifetimes, live within the minds of each human in our society. Not only is it associated with great meanings, it provokes many emotions that we feel such as aggressiveness or delightment. Symbols are extremely expressive and can change how our behavior may come about. For example, heart signs, logos, money and even religious flags have enough power to instantly change a person’s behavior when particular symbols are being encountered. Many experiments, tested by featured psychologists in the book, Drunk Tank Pink by Adam Alter, reveal surprising results when people are faced or reminded with even a glimpse of a symbol.
The subtle but accepted social norms can be categorised neatly into two categories; folkways and mores. While both of these are informal social rules; folkways carry almost no punishment, although, mores are rules that when broken reap heavy consequences. The study of social norms is best done under the symbolic interactionalism lens. Symbolic interactionalism allows us to look at society on a micro level, meaning, we are able to focus on individuals, particularly, emphasizing verbal and physical gestures and how we interpret them.
A pedestrian light is an example of a behaviour which can eventually become automatized once people get familiar with its colours and figures. If these colours and figures are incongruent, people will try to control the automatic process, resulting in slower response (Perrochon, Kemoun, Watelain, Dugue, & Berthoz, 2015). After WWII, West Germans used the standard European pedestrian traffic signal – a red abstract human figure standing still for “do not walk” and a green abstract human figure in mid-stride for “walk”. East Germans devised their own signals – a little traffic light man with a jaunty hat and arms outstretched to form a ‘T’ represents “don’t walk”, while the “walk” symbol is similar to that of Westerns. Because the pedestrian signals for East Germans displayed more interference, they are less congruent and may be a potential cause for danger (Peschke, Olk, & Hilgetag, 2013).
Also a symbol can mean something in real life. Could be a person or an object. In this story there were a lot of different symbols with different
This theory was made by Michael Argyle (1925- 2002), who was a social psychologist. In the late 1960s he studied social skills, body language, non-verbal communication and interpersonal behaviour. In this study, he found that non-verbal signals can be much more important and useful than verbal communication when trying to trigger peoples’ attitudes and feelings. His research showed and found that the stronger the relationship between the people communicating so with close friends for example the much better eye contact. However, when the relationship is not very strong so when speaking to a stranger people don’t have very good eye contact and they tend to look away when talking.
Silence is an important part of many Aboriginal conversations as it indicates a form of respect and the participants desire to think. This difference could have serious implication throughout the legal process as silence could easily be interpreted as ignorance, confusion or guilt of a crime or a testimony. Further disadvantages suffered by Aboriginal people in legal questioning concerns cultural difference in the use of eye contact. Direct eye contact is frequently avoided in Aboriginal interactions as it is deemed threatening or rude. Inversely, the avoidance of eye contact is interpreted as rudeness or dishonestly in non-Aboriginal interaction in Australia.
Literary Term: Symbol Symbol: A symbol is an object, person, or event that has another meaning other than its own to represent an idea, object, or connection Example: “Yes, I did see this, with my own eyes… children thrown into the flames” (32). Wiesel, Night Function: Context: In Night by Elie Wiesel, Eliezer’s family had arrived in the Auschwitz concentration camp, where Eliezer was separated from his family and was only left with his father.
He eventually moves to Alaska and wants to run the Iditarod. He tells his stories and explains his relationships with the dogs. He explains the struggles using the literary concepts of symbols, theme, and metaphors to expand the reader’s understanding or the text. Symbol is an object representing something else. It is a concept or idea that uses something else to show it.
In Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” he writes a story about a husband's journey to his epiphany. Robert, a blind man, teaches the husband how to see without his eyes. Often a person with the ability to see takes this for granted, leaving them only to see what is on the outside rather than seeing people, and things for what they really are. In this short story, Carver conveys the narrators epiphany through the symbol of the cathedral. Carver develops a story with symbolism throughout his story, beginning with the first line, “This blind man, an old friend of my wife’s
Introduction In 1876, Captain Nathan Algren, an ex- United States Army Captain is traumatized by experience fighting in the civil war and Indian war. Algren accepts a job by a Japanese businessman to train the Imperial Japanese Army to inhibit a samurai rebellion, led by Katsumoto Moritsugu. He sails to Japan. Most of the soldiers being trained are just slightly better than peasants and farmers that are not experienced.
There are certain said and unsaid rules and regulations that teacher and student follow. For example the student is aware that he or she has to give respect to the teacher and they know that there is a certain way they have to sit in class while being taught or for that matter standing up from their places greeting the teacher when they enter the class. The teacher knows that there is a particular way to address the class or help a student out. The teacher knows that the only way she or he can efficiently convey information or instructions is if the students are able to understand him or her thus it is very important for a mutual understanding to be established between them. These are all considered as symbols of