ipl-logo

Genghis Khan's Violent And Strict Nature

1113 Words5 Pages

Did Genghis Khan’s violent and strict nature help in the growth of his empire?
Introduction
In this paper, I will make connection between Genghis Khan’s violent nature and the functioning of his administration. World knows that he was a violent ruler but also possessed exceptional leadership qualities. I will try to add how Genghis Khan’s violent and strict nature actually helped him to govern and develop his empire. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What if I say that the ruler who conquered more land than any other man on the earth, who is responsible for the deaths of millions of beings, who was feared the most during his reign, who punished those severely who opposed …show more content…

It consisted of strict laws which involved punishing a thief by blows of a rod, executing a soldier who abandons his military duties, cutting hands of an aggressor and also the ban on selling and kidnapping women. He took strict measures to rigorously enforce the rules. Not only this, but he also ordered his descendants to continue to maintain the code of law. On the grounds of these laws, the Mongol empire after Genghis Khan till the fall of the empire encountered peace among people and loyalty of people towards officials and members of Khan family. If Genghis had been liberal towards the necessity of having strict laws and had not created such laws, or if he had not taken seriously the people who broke the formed laws, it had been much difficult for him and his representatives to govern as it had created chaos in the society. Ignoring the safety of women and the security of people’s property could have resulted into disturbances in his society in the absence of such law or its violation. “He insisted on the rule of law and abolished torture, but he mounted major campaigns to seek out and kill raiding bandits and terrorist assassins”(Weatherford). This made his society secure and

Show More
Related
1313 Words | 6 Pages

It also helped congregate people of different cultures that were ruled by Genghis Khan, the Mongol leader. New systems were made and old systems were adapted to, to create the Pax Mongolica. Some policies allowed for the Muslims to create the Pax Mongolica and they did it affect Europe and Asia greatly. The Pax Mongolica, also referred to as the “Mongol Peace,” was in effect during the 13th and 14th centuries.

Read More
382 Words | 2 Pages

The Mongols who are they and were they barbaric? The mongols was a small clan until they came to one leadership whom being named genghis Khan. He who lead the mongols to a world of conquering and success. The mongols were barbaric empire. They way they kept soldiers fighting is cruel, they way they killed people from other empires is not necessary, and the way they got married depending on the situation is unfair.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

Nomadic customs and competions led to the ingraining of hostility in their society. If you look at Genghis Khan’s past you can see that his way of being started to form once his father was murdered by a member of a neighboring tribe. And once he became leader what he knew, which was

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

these could be left unattended because of the severity of (Mongol) laws against theft”(Document 7). The population under Genghis Khan’s rule shouldn’t have to live in fear of harsh or fatal punishments due to doing petty

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

This displays the Mongol characteristic of adaptation and acceptance towards new cultures and ideas, implementing diversity. When the Mongols conquered most of Asia, including China and Persia, they also gained control of the continental caravan routes, which were essential to their lucrative commerce(Document J). It is a misconception that the Mongols, a successful empire that excelled in it varied commerce and trade, was barbaric due to the mature level of tolerance required for peaceful public

Read More
1412 Words | 6 Pages

Theft is a law that the Mongol society takes seriously. Among Mongols there were very few to none robbers and thieves. Carts and houses don't have locks on them because people usually didn't steal and the hard punishment surrounding it (document 7). Document 7 shows that the Mongols are against stealing from each other yet document 4 shows an inconsistent with their morals. Document 4 says that the Mongols began to “slay and plunder” which means they began to kill and forcefully steal.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The Mongols were people who emerged from the vasts of Central Asia in the 13th century. Led by Genghis Khan, they rapidly conquered a vast empire that stretched from China to Eastern Europe. While the Mongols are often depicted as brutal conquerors, the documents provided offer a better view of their impact on the world. These documents include accounts of Mongol diplomacy, trade, and cultural exchange, as well as descriptions of their military campaigns. By examining these documents, we can gain a better understanding of the legacy of the Mongols and the ways in which they shaped the world we live in today.

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Genghis Khan: Lord of the Mongols Genghis Khan didn’t just lead a powerful empire that conquered cities throughout Eurasia. The Mongolian attacks and conquering of cites wasn't all negative, it introduced an era of peace and success in Eurasia (Genghis 1). Genghis Khan is a very important historical figure because he influenced religions and civilizations in his empire, impacted safe trade and travel on the silk road, and his legacy is shown in the vast amount of his descendants that can be traced through DNA. Genghis Khan wiped out numerous powerful civilizations and influenced the spread of religions. Religions spread because the Mongols did not enforce any religions (Invasions).

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

by vizmike in November 19, 2013 Despite the fact the Mongols frequently used torture and inhumane battle tactics during war, these definitions shows that the mongols were civilized in the times that they were not in war. If people surrendered or were subdued without resistance the mongols exacted tribute, such as taxes or men for war, but generally left the inhabitants alone because their had more joy to spread. (Chapter 14-15 in world history textbook in the library.) To sum it up the mongols were generally peaceful and prosperous but just like any conquest they had to killed a few to get there such as the roman rule or the Han Dynasty

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

His reign led to many rebellions, which obviously caused many people to lose their lives. If you resisted and your life ended, the lives of your relatives could also be taken to weed out any possible traitors. (Which I found rather brutal.) Also, if one were to be conquered and not killed, enslaved, or imprisoned, they’d be taxed heavily. As stated before, the Mongols were ordered to destroy the farmlands to make room for pasture, which led to the starvation of many people.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

The Mongols, a native asian tribe, eight hundred years ago conquered much of the known world. Said tribe originated from the grasslands of central asia and went on to become one of the most successful and most conversed about castes in history. The story of the mongols, however, is one that is quite difficult to tell. The Mongols were an illiterate clan, making it close to impossible to receive a message in full context, much like the telephone game nowadays were a message is spread through many individuals until reaching the final destination. For hundreds of years the Mongols have been a center of debate for many history related discussions, though the common conclusion is yes, the mongols were a barbaric tribe, that’s not really the case, and it’s backed by facts.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

They brutally expanded their empire, but when they did, they made something of it and grew it economically. They had morally correct rules, but their punishments were intense. The Mongol empire grew primarily through the use of aggressive military tactics. To win, they played very dirty, but

Read More
2071 Words | 9 Pages

Despite of their ruthless, the Mongol Empire did has positive impacts on the development of Europe in five different areas, namely political, economic, social, weapons advancement and spread of Christianity due to the Mongol exchange. First, in political aspects, some said the mongols have a negative impact on Europe , as they changed the political history of Europe, especially of Russia, because of their ruling in conquered countries. Genghis Khan used the psychological warfare, the terror tactics, to deal with the resistance: surrender or die. The Mongols usual policy was slaughtered and depopulated the entire cities that resisted, and

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

The Mongols Intro The Mongols have made a negative impact to all of us in one way or another. Some ways worse than others. Some of the things Genghis Khan has done may be cruel and wrong, but was what he had to do to be a great leader. The Mongolians ruled from 1260 to 1368 C.E, they were located in Mongolia, in the Northern China area.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

Mongol armies tore through most of the ancient world throughout the 13th century. Pillaging and plundering every nation in their path, the Mongols left an impressive wake of destruction and death. The Mongols shook the world with the impact of their conquests, but not of their influence was negative. Overall the Mongols brought much needed change in politics and commerce to both China and the Middle East.

Read More

More about Genghis Khan's Violent And Strict Nature

Related Topics

Open Document