Gilgamesh Vs. Hammurabi: The King Of Babylon

358 Words2 Pages
Hammurabi ruled far after Gilgamesh passed. They were both influential in their respective kingdoms. Hammurabi was the King of Babylon, Gilgamesh was the King of Uruk. Unfortunately Gilgamesh was not a favored as Hammurabi was. Gilgamesh's people wanted him to leave them alone, that he wasn't being a very good king and that the city state would be better off without his oppressive and tyrannical rule. So he was portrayed in a very negative light even though he accomplished a lot. Whereas, Hammurabi was loved by his people. He establish justice of the land and cancelled any outstanding debts from individuals. He did this to gain support of his people and help them get on with their lives. As it turned out Hammurabi turn out to be the better

More about Gilgamesh Vs. Hammurabi: The King Of Babylon