Elizabeth Kirchner Guppies January 4, 2018 I believe that there is many reasons for Hamlet 's actions to be justified and not justified. But it depends on what you believe from the information you were given from the packet. I personally believe that he is both justified and not justified from just reading the book. But the packet helps you understand more than the book did. "Remember Me" is the first document and this document is basically telling us about Hamlet 's fathers ghost and that Claudius or Hamlet 's uncle had killed Hamlet 's dad for many reasons. Also then Hamlet made a promise to his father 's ghost that he would revenge his death. Also Hamlet had to revenge …show more content…
(Doc.E) "Theories Of Revenge" is the sixth document and in this document it is making a reference to Hamlet. In the first paragraph it talks about how the son was expected to revenge his father’s death, just like Hamlet had to do for his father. It was also written during the Elizabeth age or English history. In the other paragraph if you knew someone that was murdered or died you weren’t to revenge there death. Instead you were to let god decide what happens to the person or people. (Doc.F) "Justified Or Not Justified" is what the whole point of this DBQ. So I have to decide if Hamlets actions are justified or not justified. I believe that Hamlets actions were justified because Hamlet had went through a lot of trouble to figure out how to get revenge for his father’s death, when he was going to get revenge for his father 's death, and many other things. In the end Hamlet had made a promise to his father 's ghost that he would revenge his father’s death. He did revenge his father 's death even though it might not have been so soon but he did come through for his dad