ipl-logo

Hammurabi's Code Dbq

1214 Words5 Pages

Hammurabi was the bringer of death. According to the background essay around 1800 BCE a man named Hammurabi became king of a small city-state called Babylonia.He didn’t really get along with other kings as far as more than 50 miles away. According to the map Hammurabi ruled over half of Mesopotamia . Hammurabi also ruled over a population of 1,000,000, but we are not here to talk about who Hammurabi was. We are here to answer the question did Hammurabi rule fairly? I think Hammurabi wasn’t fair because of his family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law. In one section of his code it talks about Family Law, which personally I think was unjust. According to document C in Law 195 it states that if a son strikes his father his hands shall …show more content…

According to document E in Law 199 it states that if he has knocked out the eye of a slave … he shall pay half his value. First of all isn’t the point of Hammurabi’s law supposed to be protecting the strong from the weak? Then why isn’t Hammurabi doing it with this law? Imagine if this slave isn’t worth much because he is weak then it wouldn’t really hurt the man who attacked him so they knock his eye out freely because it doesn’t affect them that much. This isn’t really protecting. If anything this is protecting the weak from the weak because some of the weak can’t afford his value. This isn’t fair to the slave because the punishment isn’t that big to some of the stronger people. Another Law 218 this law seems unjust to me as well. Law 218 states that if a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused death, … his hands shall be cut off. This law would make me not want to be a surgeon which they probably needed back then i’m assuming. The patient had a serious injury that could have possibly been untreatable and now they lost a surgeon which they probably had very little of . This isn’t fair at all they didn’t even have that big of a population with very little surgeons. So this brings it down every time a patient

Show More
Related
545 Words | 3 Pages

Was it Just? “Cursed!” is what you'll hear if you decline the written rules of Hammurabi.400 years ago in 1754 Bce. A man named Hammurabi became king of a city called babylonia and made certain rules about family law, property law, and personal injury law and although they were laws, not all laws were fair. To begin with, Hammurabi made a decision to write rules for his land. But were they just?let's answer that.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

So I think that Hammurabi's Code was just because of Family Law and Property Law. Hammurabi's Code was just and was supported by Family Law. Reason one, According to law 195 of Hammurabi’s Code states that if a son has struck his father his hand shall be cut off. This is just because you should never rise against authority anyways. Reason two, law 148 states if a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, he must take care of her until she dies or he can marry a second but the first wife will live in the house.

Read More
104 Words | 1 Pages

Code#195 states “If a son has struck his father, his hand shall be cut off.”(12), which is self-explanatory; a son who hits his dad gets his hand cut off. Losing a hand in this case would seem like an extreme punishment; however Hammurabi’s Code is based on a lex talionis principle when directly translated means “an eye for an eye” where punishment will reflect what crime was committed. 195’s short phasing is significant because specific details or alternate situations were given to code related to family matters. Since there are no alternate events where the father provoked such a response it is likely

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

He wanted to make justice and laws to support also protect widows and orphans. Hammurabi made laws for all of the diverse people. Next, we hear about the laws and the code. These 282 law where found by French archeologist.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Social relations plays a big role in the law code of Hammurabi, there’s a different punishment for different ranks of people. The richer you are the less of a punishment you will receive. For an example in Law code 198 states that “if he puts out the eye of a freed man, or break the bone of a freed man, he shall pay one gold mina”. But if the man is a slave he would only have to pay one-half of

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Hammurabi claimed that his laws were both just and helpful to a wide range of people, but the majority of the laws don’t support either of his claims. In the instance of many laws, he appears to be very drastic with his consequences. In one of his codes, he says that if a women is caught in adultery with another man, both people must be tied up and thrown into the water (doc C, law 129). The act of binding the two people together and drowning them is a very specific and extreme repercussion for cheating. Another example of Hammurabi’s unnecessary harshness, was the law stating that if a man has broken into another’s house he shall be put to death by piercing him or hanging him in the hole which he made in the house (doc D, law 21).

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

Rather, the Code of Hammurabi institutionalizes inequality by punishing crime based on the victim’s social standings. For example, the Code demands finger amputation for the surgeon that causes the accidental death of a noble, while no comparable punishment exists for the accidental death of a slave. This disparity reflects the differing value offered to the community by the noble and the slave, explained by the community’s investment in each. Through this distinction, the Code of Hammurabi incentivizes surgeons to not operate on those with more societal value. This legal inequality demonstrates a first principle of the Babylonian: good law is designed to protect the community.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

This law seems, as well, too harsh. The son should get a punishment but getting your hands cut off for hitting his father would lead to son being scared. In conclusion, Hammurabi 's code is unjust. The evidence shows that the Personal Injury Laws didn’t protect all people equally, the Property Laws punishments were too harsh, and the Family Laws can cause someone 's death.

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

King Hammurabi’s Code was fair because it protected the weak in family,injury,and property problems. Hammurabi’s code was just because it restored property,it protected the weak,and it helped people through bad times. First of all,Hammurabi’s code was just to family laws. For example,law 68 is fair because you have to provide framework to state your point. Also,law 148 which states that you have to take care of your wife before moving on and marrying another wife.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Visualize having a king who made 282 laws and if a person did not follow them they would get a really big punishment. That is how it was 4,000 years ago when a king named Hammurabi ruled in Babylon. He ruled Babylon for 42 years. King Hammurabi became king of Babylon in 1754 BCE. Were Hammurabi’s laws and codes fair and just?

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

Hammurabi's code is unjust. Hammurabi did try to do what was right by trying to have a community with justice, but the laws are very unequal and harsh. These laws would not last in today's

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

Read More

More about Hammurabi's Code Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document