ipl-logo

Harris V. Jones Analysis

649 Words3 Pages

Finally, in the fifth count of her complaint, Ellina states a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). “[T]o impose liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress: (1) The conduct must be intentional or reckless; (2) The conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) There must be a causal connection between the wrongful conduct and the emotional distress; (4) The emotional distress must be severe.” Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560, 566 (1977). Critically, the intent requirement of the tort requires the tortfeasor to have acted intentionally or recklessly. Indeed, in her complaint, Ellina alleges that Gil “intentionally and/or recklessly engaged in conduct . . .” If Gil acted intentionally, then Amica would have no obligation to indemnify him because exclusion 2(a) would apply. If, however, Gil acted merely recklessly, then exclusion 2(a) would be inapplicable. …show more content…

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A (Intent means “the actor desires to cause consequences of his act, or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it.”). Critically, exclusion 2(a) only applies when the actor has the subjective knowledge that his conduct will inflict “personal injury.” In the present complaint, if Gil acted intentionally, then he would have harbored such a subjective intent. The allegations against Gil as pleaded in Ellina’s complaint, however, leave open the potential that Gil merely acted recklessly. Therefore, Amica may not disclaim its duty to defend Gil against the allegations of IIED based on exclusion number

Show More
Related
493 Words | 2 Pages

7. Under no circumstances should Eran Gregory Edwards be able to pick up Addilyn Grace Edwards in his personal use vehicle, due to the following; under laws provided for Ignition Interlock Device for a child including the event of an emergency, Jessica Janette Parish Fine, Criminal records, anger issues, alcohol and drug use. 8. In the event of Addilyn Grace Edwards medical insurance being suspended at any time, Eran Gregory Edwards should provide all medical and dental insurance and pay for any medical and dental

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

A review of the events involving the North Charleston, S. Carolina Whitlee Jones murder case as it applies to the Tennessee “stand your ground” statute brings several factors into question. As indicated in the article, South Carolina’s law as does Tennessee’s states that a person having reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm can use deadly force on the unlawful intruder. However, this does not apply to a lawful resident or a person who has a legal right to be in the dwelling, business, or auto (Knapp, 2014). As Jones indicates she removes herself from the danger on several occasions, yet she continues to return, placing herself once again in position to receive serious injury or death from her boyfriend who is legally occupying the

Read More
97 Words | 1 Pages

when Sue Sylvester learned that Mr. shuester had killed Titan she was very upset at losing her companion Ms. Sylvester has come to our office to ask if she can sue Mr. Schuester over the death of her beloved Titan I am considering filing a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Please review the attached case, Ammon v. Welty, 113 S.W.3d 185 (Ky. App. 2002), assume it states the current law on the topic, and write an analysis of whether Mr. Schuester’s conduct meets the “intent” element of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

The plaintiff is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However, the issue should have been decided by the jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual. The issue is whether the district court correctly granted summary judgment in the favor of the defendant because the shaker table rotation rule at issue was an essential function of the employee’s job.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

1. Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases. In the New Jersey v. T.L.O. the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district, after they found a 14 year old girl smoking in the bathroom. And got her consent to search her bag. In which they found different types of drugs as well as she had intended to sell.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

In his complaint, which tort theory is Julian’s attorney most likely to allege and what will he have to prove for Julian to be successful? 
Julian’s attorney is most likely to allege that mike reacted in a negligent matter in his complaint. As people it is our duty to act reasonably. A reasonable person would not have picked up Julian after witnessing him take a kick to the head. A reasonable person should not move a person who has received a kick to the head.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Overview of Clements v. State The case of Clements v. State is an example of how the legal framework of stalking laws in Texas should be interpreted and the effectiveness of this law to ensure justice for the victims. The case depicts how the law should operate despite certain vagueness in aspects of the First Amendment. The decision of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas to uphold the conviction while disagreeing with some conclusions arrived at by the trial court proves that stalkers will not be allowed to slide through cracks in the legal system. The case, based on a sequence of events where the complainant, Jennifer Clements, was subject to psychological trauma accompanied by an imminent physical threat to her from Nathan Clement, her estranged husband, is a forthright condition of stalking which complies with the Statues of

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
1661 Words | 7 Pages

See Love-Lace v. Martin, 355 F.3d 766, 782 (4th Cir. 2004) (no respondeat superior liability under §1983); Monell v. New York Dep’t of Soc. Serv., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978). In order for liability to exist under § 1983, there must be personal involvement by the Defendant in the alleged violation.

Read More
618 Words | 3 Pages

The United States’ Bill of Rights was effected in December 15, 1791. This was done two years after the Congress forwarded to the state Legislatures twelve proposed constitution amendments. The third amendment through to the twelfth amendment were adopted to become the Bill of Rights of the United States. The proposition of the Bill of Rights was done by James Madison mainly as a response to constitution opponents including some founding fathers who were against the ratification of the constitution on grounds that it failed to safeguard basic human liberty principles. On June 8, 1791 he presented a series of thirty-nine constitution amendments to the House of Representatives part of which proposed the constitution to be opened up and specific

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

Read More
2642 Words | 11 Pages

Q1 This paper will discuss potential criminal liability, including consideration of whether either has any defences for Jake and Cain in IRAC form. First will be Jake for his liability with regards to his actions against Cain. Jakes issue is if he is likely to be charged for the actions he inflicted upon Cain, the potential charge being Harassment, under the protection of Harassment Act 19971. These actions included sending 30 letters to Cains's home containing warnings of his safety in work, wrote in red pen, a series of silent phone calls, as well as a note being left on his car saying he is being watched.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

This brings into question the severity and extent to which Robert Harris should be held accountable for his actions. There are two different ends of the morality spectrum through which Harris can be found guilty: moral responsibility and criminal responsibility. This is where the different theories on moral responsibility truly come into play. While none of these philosophical arguments would hold up in court, it does make the decisions made by Robert Harris seem much more complicated than it first appeared. The criminal justice system is based on a libertarian train of thought.

Read More
1997 Words | 8 Pages

Critical analysis of negligence and present legal scenario Abstract- The goal of this topic is to set out clearly what critical analysis is in general and how it plays itself out in variety of domains. Critical analysis too refers to critical thinking. The danger of misunderstanding and misapplication is touched in this topic the aim of this topic is to identify a coherent legal response to a particular casual problem of “negligence” in critical analysis it is important to identify the focus of the assignment .critical begins with identify your own point to view Introduction

Read More

More about Harris V. Jones Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document