ipl-logo

New Jersey V. Acton Case Summary

463 Words2 Pages

1. Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases. In the New Jersey v. T.L.O. the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district, after they found a 14 year old girl smoking in the bathroom. And got her consent to search her bag. In which they found different types of drugs as well as she had intended to sell. The police then arrested her. T.L.O appealed because she thought the search of her purse was a violation of her rights under the Fourth Amendment. However the court ruled against this. In Vernania v. The school district required a drug test at the beginning of the football season. And randomly throughout for student athletes. James parents would not consent to the test and attempted to sue the school for testing their sun without any evidence. However the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district. Since drug have been becoming a increasing problem in that area especially among athletes. 2. …show more content…

How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other? They are both similar to each other because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of both school districts. When the families of the children felt they were being robbed of their amendment rights. However the schooled ruled in the favor of the school districts because both cases fell under the drug policy’s that the schools have in order to prevent drug use. 3. What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion? They main argument for each side is that the school district is violation of the children’s amendment rights. The main evidence in Vernonia’s case is that drug tests where being conducted without legitimate suspicion of a problem was an unreasonable search. In the T.L.O cause the felt the school district search of her purse was a violation of her

Show More
Related
497 Words | 2 Pages

School officials’ strip searched Redding based off of a tip they received from another student at the school. Redding filed suit against the administrators who administered the search. She claimed that her Fourth Amendment rights of an unreasonable search were violated. A district court threw out the case but Redding appealed the case, which was threw out again on the initial appeal, but after being reheard a second time the court of appeals found that the young

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of Brooks vs. Northwood Little League has little relevance to my profession as a future sports psychologist. Overall I do not think I will be in this exact situation but I can take some learning opportunities from this case. I learned in my case that anyone can be sued for negligence but you have to prove the four elements of negligence in order to win. In my case of Brooks vs. Northwood Little League, Brooks sued for negligence and lost her case. Brooks lost this case because she couldn’t prove all four parts of negligence.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Analysis of Kelo vs. New London The unpopular Supreme Court decision of Kelo vs. New London has broken many citizens trust in having secured property rights. In Kelo vs. New London, the City of New London was condemning the property of several homeowners, in order to sell the land to private developers that would use the land to make a retail condo development. The local government approved the new development in order to gain higher tax revenue and to bring more jobs to the area. Homeowners who believed that their waterfront residence was being unfairly taken contested the City’s actions in court.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

if it was held at school of course they would be expelled. After listening to the case i believe that the court made a good

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Hearn’s termination was upheld by the United State Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit due to her direct violation of the employee agreement and refusal to take the drug test within the two-hour time frame. Judge James C. Hill concluded that the search of Ms. Hearn’s vehicle was done from a law enforcement operation and not that of campus security. It was also ruled that the search of her vehicle did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights, because the alert by the officer’s canine gave “reasonable suspicion” resulting in a probable cause search of the car. In the United States v. Ludwig, 10 F. 3d 1523, 1527 (10th Cir . 1993) case, the precedent was set which declared that when the canine alerted the police to potential controlled substances it gave them reasonable cause to search the vehicle without a warrant. Judge Hill stated that Ms. Hearn’s refusal to take the urinalysis drug test did constitute administrative discipline under the board policy and the production of body fluids is not viewed by the courts as communication.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

The case was implied a Magistrate Judge, whose brief discoveries and recommendation completed up, and "the Pledge does not slight the Establishment Clause. " The District Court grasped that proposition and released the protestation on July 21, 2000. The Court of Appeals turned around and issued three separate choices talking about the benefits and Newdow 's standing. As it would see it, the offers court consistently held that Newdow has remaining as a watchman to challenge a practice that meddles with his qualification to facilitate the religious direction of his daughter. That holding managed Newdow 's remaining to challenge not only the game plan of the school locale, where his young lady still is enrolled, moreover the 1954 Act of

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Rosario”). However, the district court decided that the plaintiff violated the “Confidentiality Act,” which “permits disclosure of confidential communications of a minor between the ages of twelve and eighteen if…the therapist finds disclosure to be in the best interest of the minor” (“Dr. Rosario”). The courts also determined that he violated “The Reporting Act,” which requires school personnel to immediately report suspected child abuse to authorities (“Pesce v. J”). Dr. Pesce also violated the J. Sterling Morton High School District Employment Contract by not promptly reporting the incident, and therefore, putting J.D. in danger. In addition, the courts decided that Pesce’s rights were not violated (“Dr. Rosario”).

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

Inside, he found cigarettes, rolling paper, a large amount of one dollar bills, a pipe, marijuana, an index card that appeared to be students that owed T.L.O. money, and two letters that applied that T.L.O. was selling marijuana in schools. T.L.O.’s mother was called by Choplick and was asked to take T.L.O. to the Police Office. She willingly did so. Because of her confessions and the evidence against her, New Jersey brought charges against her. In a local court, T.L.O. argued that her rights given by the Fourth

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

Based on her confession and the evidence in her purse, the state of New Jersey brought charges against her. In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Three laws that have shaped and resolved the rights and services available to the students with disabilities will be discussed in this section. Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Individuals with Disabilities Act( IDEA )and The Americans Disabilities Act( ADA). The IDEA is the major federal statute providing educational rights to students with disabilities. Even so, two other statutes, Section 504 of the rehabilitation Act and ADA which was modified recently (ADA,2006,2008), also have implication for the disciplinary process when it involves students with disabilities ( Russo & Osborne, 2009). Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is the first federal civil rights law protecting the rights of persons with disabilities.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

There comes a time in the criminal justice system where a law that was written to protect us will be challenged through a court case. That case will eventually make history and will become a reference in future cases with similar dilemmas. In 1983, one particular case met the criteria (Arizona vs. Youngblood). In this case, Larry Youngblood was convicted by a jury in Arizona of child molestation, sexual assault, and kidnapping of a ten-year-old boy. Both a criminologist for the State and an expert witness for the defendant testified as to what they believed the results were from the tests that were performed on the samples shortly after they were collected, they also commented on later tests performed on the samples from the boy’s clothing

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

Nine judges will examine the case, analyze the arguments made by both parties, and then come to a conclusion on who made the best justifications. Lindsay Earls and Daniel James both made arguments stating that it was unjust for a public school district to probe their students for drugs. In James Kozlowski’s article, he states, “On appeal, the students had argued that ‘drug testing must be based at least on some level of individualized suspicion’” (Kozlowski 36). The Supreme Court’s response to the scholars’ explanation is that “It is true that we generally determine the reasonableness of a search by balancing the nature of the intrusion on the individual’s privacy against the promotion of legitimate governmental interests” (Kozlowski 36). The court continues to say that occasionally, public school districts have the right to intrude on the privacy of their students (Kozlowski 36-37).

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated… We all know the fourth amendment. It's the amendment that guarantees our safety within our homes and our personal belongings. Yet, how much do you know about the fourth amendment? The fourth amendment is full of history, controversy, and discussion, even in modern day.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

3. How did the defense attorney's attitude change as the trial process progressed (cite specific examples)? The defense becomes more confident as evidence that is more bogus was presented from the DA. For example, when he said that the children had not been abused and their thoughts on abuse and the satanic acts had been coached by the therapists.

Read More

More about New Jersey V. Acton Case Summary

Open Document