Henrietta Lacks Research Papers

585 Words3 Pages

Immortal Henrietta Informed consent is an ethically important aspect of medical care; patients must be fully informed of any and all possible risks and benefits from receiving medical treatment, participating in medical research as a subject, or donating live tissues to be studied. Only after receiving and understanding all of the necessary information can a patient give consent; if the patient does not consent, for whatever reason, then it is both illegal and unethical to follow through with treatment, research, or taking samples (O’Neill, 2003). However, particularly in regard to taking tissue samples, some doctors seem to think that what the patient doesn’t know won’t hurt them. One example of this is Henrietta Lacks and HeLa cells. …show more content…

In January 1951, she was diagnosed with terminal cervical cancer; she died in October of the same year (Skloot, 2010). Before she died, one of her doctors took a sample of cells from her tumor without either informing Henrietta nor asking her consent. The cells were allowed to reproduce in a petri dish; unlike ordinary human cells that die after so many reproductions, Henrietta’s cell continued to reproduce. They are commonly known as immortal HeLa cells, and they are still reproducing and being used in labs all over the world (Longwill, 2016). It wasn’t until more than 20 years after Henrietta’s death that her family was even aware that the HeLa cells existed. The cells had been used to cure polio, and they had been used to research other diseases, such as lung cancer, leukemia, Parkinson’s, and others (Longwill, 2010). Scientists were selling vials of the HeLa cells to other labs all around the world, while Henrietta’s family struggled. Even to this day, not a single member of Henrietta’s family has received any kind of compensation for Henrietta’s contribution to medicine. HENRIETTA 3 Henrietta’s daughter Deborah was angry that the cells were harvested from her …show more content…

However, “the Lacks family has come to be proud of Henrietta’s scientific contributions” (Longwill, 2010). Even though they have accepted the existence of the cells and are glad the cells have benefitted so many people and they no longer expect any kind of monetary compensation, it was still unethical for the doctor to take and use the cells without Henrietta’s consent. While it is too late to get that consent, it is still possible to offer the family some kind of recognition or reimbursement. One way to compensate the family is to properly acknowledge Henrietta; as previously stated, not all scientists know Henrietta’s name. It should be properly taught in medical classes that her name is Henrietta Lacks, and it should be made widely known that it is thanks to her that the polio vaccine and other medical advances were made. Also, it is still possible to offer each member of her family a percentage from each vial of Henrietta’s cells that are sold. HENRIETTA 4 References Longwill, L. (2016, 02). WHOSE CELL LINE IS IT ANYWAY?: Science, ethics, and