ipl-logo

Henry Cabot Lodge's Argument On The League Of Nations

249 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: USA foreign policy

Based on Henry Cabot Lodge’s statement about the League of Nations, one can say that he is willing to join with compromises to certain articles. However, William Borah wants the opposite and no compromises will change his stance. Lodge’s statement suggests that he is for the League of Nations when he speaks about the United States being of great service to world peace. However, Lodge states beforehand that he does not want the Unites State’s actions to be determined by other countries. Article 10, under the League of Nations, states that the league will vote on how to respond to quarrels. This would make congressional declaration of war obsolete, which undermines the policies that the United States was built on. This is the main issue
Show More
Related
595 Words | 3 Pages

In 1920, Candidate Warren G. Harding accords a speech about why he opposes joining the League of Nation. Harding also included in his speech that he rejected obligation and how it will threaten America sovereignty (Doc A). Because the public opposes joining the League of Nation, there was no country powerful enough to force Japan to accept by the Kellogg-Briand pact. The Kellogg-Briand pact formally declared aggressive war, banning the use of war as a tool of national policy except only using it for

Read More
397 Words | 2 Pages

Because of that point, American senators were iffy about ratifying the treaty. They saw the League of Nations as a trap. Basically America would be pulled into all kinds of wars even if they were not the ones directly attacked. If America had decided to ratify it, all of the Americans would be at risk because who is to say a nation not in the

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

As seen in the unification of the aforementioned countries, nationalism always leads to some form of international tension. Most particular to this time, absence of an international body capable of lessening the tension practically made World War II inescapable. As shown by the League of Nations’ powerless depiction as a rabbit (Doc. E) in the face of international strife and as evidenced by the un-intervened nature of the chaotic Spanish Civil War (Doc. K), the world anxiously recognized during this time that WWII would be right around the

Read More
1349 Words | 6 Pages

If Lodge had ratified the Treaty along with other Senators, American worldly involvement would have impacted Europe with its ever growing presence. Woodrow Wilson proclaimed in “Appeal to the Country” that the Founding Fathers saw America as a light and leader to world that pushed for the rights of others, which he believed, was thoroughly expressed in the League of Nations. (Doc. G) Wilson fully supported the idea of American involvement in the Treaty and League as these came directly from the idea of his Fourteen Points. Wilson’s Fourteen Points were ideas for postwar Europe, eight being specific recommendations for adjusting postwar boundaries and establish

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

I don't know that I really agree with either one of these positions! You see, in Federalist #10, Madison argues against the establishment of factions, which some people have taken to mean that he was opposed to political parties - not separate branches of government. Madison states that factions can be destroyed by limiting individual liberty (which is undesirable) or by creating a homogeneous society (which is impractical. Because the causes of factionalism cannot be curbed, its effects must be limited by making a republic large enough, with enough checks and balances, such that a majority faction cannot gain power at the expense of minority factions, fooling voters and exploiting their passions. In federalist 51, the idea of having three

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Led by Alexander Hamilton, constructed secretly at first, the Federalists were the first political party of the United States. Supporters of the Constitution, they attempted to convince the States to validate said document. Hamilton, with John Jay and James Madison- said individuals anonymously published a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers as a response to any argument Anti-Federalists could offer. Both Hamilton and Madison argued against the formation of a Bill of Rights for the Constitution; they argued it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting the common man. They eventually did make the concession and announced a willingness to confront the matter- the series of

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Living in Canada at the time of Confederation meant that there were many grievances that were being ignored and it came to a point where they needed to be properly addressed. There were many reasons for why Confederation occurred, but only a few of them were extremely significant. First and foremost, the economy was poor and desperately needed to do better. If small colonies combined, “they would have more taxes and more money to pay their debts as they grew” (Province of Manitoba, 2008).

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were written on November 15, 1777 when the, “Constitutional Congress met to try and come up with a framework or constitution for a new government,” as stated in the textbook Keeping the Republic by Barbour and Wright. The goal was to, “establish a ‘firm league of friendship among thirteen American states, but they did not empower a central government to act effectively on behalf of those states,” argued by Barbour and Wright, and they were not officially in effect until 1781. The Articles of Confederation started off as the first framework of government for the United States in 1781. It served as a stepping stone for the American government in order to create the Constitution. Replacing the Articles of Confederation

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

The League of Nations was a treaty to end the first war. Ending the first war, is what America needed and what they wanted. “He presided two amendments” (Witkosi). The two amendments he presided were very important to America and changed the way people voted and how they were. This was significantly important because the people wanted to vote and lowered income taxes for

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

The treaty also established The League of Nations to prevent future

Read More
1888 Words | 8 Pages

This concept appears in the vast majority of his “The Sinews of Peace” speech. Throughout the whole text there are several references to his personal feelings towards the nation of the United States of America. He refers to it as a kindred nation, a nation of great (new) power, who must take on the responsibility, united with the British Commonwealths, of guiding all the English-speaking peoples to peace. For this to happen, he insists, fraternity must

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

French interests demanded a League with teeth. They made several attempts to create a military force at the League’s disposal, but failed to persuade the British. When Wilson failed to push American membership of the League through Congress, much of theLeague’s deterrent value slipped away. The League was certainly not unimportant; it provided an international forum for discussion, it was a source of influence, and helped tackle the kinds of problems – like the refugee crisis – where a coordinated international response was desirable. Even though it had very limited powers to intervene in the internal affairs of member states, it could help publicise abuses of minority groups and expose governments to the pressure of world opinion.

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

Carr emphasises the naivety to base the study of international politics on an imaginary view of how we like to see the world. One such naivety I understood from the text was the establishment of The League of Nations, a collective security instrument. A Utopian concept, Carr is critical of the League due somewhat to his belief that it was trying to generalise world politics between “sixty known states differing widely in size, in power, and in political, economic, and cultural development” (Carr, 1939 p. 30). Another criticism of Carr’s toward the League was the notion that more powerful states would use the League as means to ensure their own interests were

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

The League of Nations was an international organization created 1919 by the American president, Woodrow Wilson, as a part of his Fourteen Points. The League was meant to maintain universal peace and resolve international disputes between nations to avoid a repeat of the First World War. The League of Nations had some successes in maintaining universal peace, however, there numerous failures as well. Some of the successes include the Åland Islands crisis and the Upper Silesia incident. Some of the failures of the League include the events that took place in Manchuria and Abyssinia.

Read More

More about Henry Cabot Lodge's Argument On The League Of Nations

Related Topics

Open Document