ipl-logo

Herbert Richardson Case

1056 Words5 Pages

Herbert Richardson was an African-American Vietnam War veteran. This man fought on the frontlines to keep our country safe until he was honorably discharged because of his psychiatric illness that developed throughout the war. After the war, Herbert was sent to a veterans hospital to help with his trauma. It was there where he met a nurse. She would treat Herbert until she moved to Dothan, Alabama. Herbert followed her there hoping to have a relationship with her, they would date for some time until she told Herbert to not contact her. Hebert would soon begin to plan ways to win back the nurse’s affection, but it ended in tragedy. Herbert made a bomb that he would place on her porch, he would detonate that bomb and then run to the nurse’s aid …show more content…

The court was prosecuting Herbert Richardson for capital murder, but they ignored the fact that he was a Vietnam War veteran, that he had acquired PTSD and other mental illnesses from the war, and that these illnesses hadn't been treated properly. “He still experienced severe head pain from his traumatic injuries in Vietnam and was known to shout ‘Incoming!’ at random times” (“Herbert Richardson”). The prosecution had completely ignored the evidence of Richardson not knowing exactly what he was doing and thinking that it was okay. “ Mr Richardson devised a bomb to place on the nurse’s front porch and planned to detonate the bomb and then run to her aid to save her, like he had saved people in Vietnam. Then she would love him and want to be with him again” (“Herbert Richardson”). This example shows that Herbert didn’t know what he was doing and what the consequences were going to be. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, there have been many cases of people being sent to death row for things that they did indeed do, but they had no clue what they were doing and what they did …show more content…

Cecil had no understanding of what he did wrong and also had no understanding of what was happening to him. “In the past decade, six psychiatric evaluations have found that Clayton should be exempt from execution because he does not understand that he will be executed, or the reasons for his execution. However, since his execution date was set, he did not have a competency hearing before a judge that could spare him from execution” (“Mentally Ill Prisoners Who Were Executed”). This shows another example of the court ignoring someone's psychological illnesses and continuing to treat this person like they were an average person who killed someone. This relates heavily to Bryan Stevenson’s case with Herbert Richardson and how his psychological illness was ignored and he was also sentenced to death and executed. To fix something as complex as the prosecutorial misconduct in Stevenson’s case with Herbert Richardson is nearly impossible. It would be super difficult to actually decide who is and isn’t mentally fit to be sentenced to

Show More
Related
63 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court tested again the procedure and criterion of competency for execution of a mental illness defendant in 2007 in Panetti v. Quarterman (Panetti I). The Supreme Court ruled in Panetti that to be executed an inmate must not only be aware of the reason for his execution, the inmate must have a rational comprehension of the State’s reasoning for his

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

There is also an inclination to believe that if he had not suffered from this state, then the offence would not have been committed, specially not in the barbaric way it was done. Thus, it cannot be concluded that the accused willfully preformed the act, nor that the mens rea and the actus reus coincided while he was not in a psychotic state. (Roach, 113) Related to this finding is another element that supports the verdict of the Honorable Judge, which is the Principle of Fundamental Justice that states that no one should be “punished for morally involuntary actions.” (Roach, 82) A person who successfully raises the mental disorder defence is considered to be morally innocent of the act because they were not acting freely, in this case, free from psychotic ideations.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

William Mullins-Johnson, a victim of wrongful conviction, spent more than 11 years in prison for a crime that never occurred, due to egregious errors made by the physicians who conducted the post-mortem examination. On June 26, 1993, twenty-two-year-old William Mullins-Johnson, or Bill for short, babysat his four-year-old niece, Valin. Valin had been running a fever earlier that day before she went to bed. The next morning Valin’s mother went into her daughter’s room and found Valin dead.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The trial court then imposed the death penalty. d. Several times before and during the course of the trial, Cooper’s competence to stand trial due to hallucinatory behavior. A judge considered whether petitioner had the ability to understand the charges against him and to assist defense counsel. i. Specifically, Cooper said he thought his prison clothing was “burning” him, he talked to both himself and an imaginary “spirit” that he believed was providing him with counsel, and he expressed fear that his life was being threated by his own counsel and that they wanted to kill him.

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

He was suffering from the side effects of the Vietnam War and had thought of some crazy way to win a girl back and when it did not go as planned, he was in trouble and his background trauma from the war was not accounted for in the courts. Bryan is trying to get the courts to recognize his past trauma and mental illnesses to try to get him a stay from death row. “...there was strong evidence that the death penalty should not be imposed because of Herbert's trauma, military service, and childhood difficulties. None of this compelling mitigating evidence was presented at trial, and it should have

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Flowers offers two reasons as to why Michelle Carter should be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter: She “actively encouraged” him to kill himself knowing that her boyfriend was emotionally unstable and confined in her and told him to “get back in” after he got out of the car filled with carbon monoxide seeking her guidance (3). Furthermore, Flowers presents counterarguments that seek Carter should not do time in prison: for example, Flowers claims that the reason Conrad Roy ultimately killed himself was because her words “get back in”, were “the proximate cause of his death” (3). In the end, Flowers concludes by saying Michelle Carter should “pay for her dark act,

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

Innocence is is a lack of guilt, with respect to any kind of crime, or wrongdoing. In a legal context, innocence refers to the lack of legal guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime. Being convicted of a crime and found not guilty later on can frustrate the convict and the convict’s family as the time spent behind bars, is time they will never get back. James Richardson was convicted and charged for murder and rape in Cross Lanes, West Virginia on May 18, 1989. First, Richardson noticed the neighbor’s house burning.

Read More
1794 Words | 8 Pages

Accordingly, I questioned Pondexter “so-called” innocence in this horrific criminal act because he knowingly entered Lennox’s home with three other men with a gun to rob, inflict fear and possibly cause harm. In my view, the crime was premeditated, including the murder. According to Pondexter’s attorney David Dow, since the first gunshot fired by James Lee Henderson pierced Lennox’s brain the defense claimed that this was the wound that resulted in her death.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

Some of the symptoms that Dr. Carpenter identified to the jury were severe, “depression and withdrawal from social contacts, eccentric or bizarre thoughts, and delusions.” (Taylor, Shootings by Hinckley Laid to Schizophrenia, 1982). While testifying to the jury, Dr. Carpenter informed the jury that in his expert opinion, Mr. Hinckley “a substantial incapacity in his ability to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law” (Taylor, Shootings by Hinckley Laid to Schizophrenia, 1982). Consequently, in this statement, Dr. Carpenter articulated to the jury that Mr. Hinckley was suffering from a disease of the mind and did neither understand the implications of his actions nor recognize that his actions were wrong; fulfilling the legal requirements for the McNaughton

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

The statement I believe he wanted to make was how smart, beautiful, athletic and elegant people can be without their handicaps and how it isn’t right to bring people down for their intelligence or beauty. One piece of evidence for this is “a living, breathing Harrison filled the screen (Page 18).” This evidence proves that he went on T.V, therefore, why would a wanted criminal go on T.V if he knew he would get caught? There are a few answers to this question but in this case, it was because Harrison wanted to make a statement in front of as many people as possible. Another piece of evidence is… “Last of all, he removed her mask.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Georgie Milton did something not many people have the guts to do, he took the life of his best friend to save him from the torture that awaited him, but, he took the life of another man and he took this life with the intention of murder. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there is no difference between euthanasia and murder; and to this indictment, George Milton has pleaded not guilty. If I am to prove him otherwise, you must find him so. Lennie Small has been described to us as a caring giant. He had no bad intentions; and it is fair to say that our witnesses have provided us with sufficient evidence to support my argument.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Bryan Stevenson never knew what could happen and he was full of fear of the possibility of jail time or death. Herbert Richardson was a mentally ill person who didn’t get the help he needed, and due to that, he killed little girl and was executed. During that time, the mentally ill lost most of its funding, and because of that, those who needed help couldn’t get it. Richardson and other mentally ill people didn’t have much money and lived in poverty. Without justice, the world would become nothing but poverty, despair and fear, and the only ones who wouldn’t be affected are the

Read More
327 Words | 2 Pages

Marc Richardson, former head of Drama at Tottington, near Manchester had been found guilty of inappropriate behavior towards female pupils. He was convicted of sexual involvement with a teenage pupil and sending text messages of the same notion to his another pupil. Richardson was caught by the CCTV camera when he was secretively leaning out of under a school stage and his teenage pupil was seen leaving after a few minutes. The pupil was not aged more than 14 years.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

He could have committed suicide in his cell, but instead he tried to talk his way out of the death penalty. This shows that criminals are afraid to be sentenced to death

Read More

More about Herbert Richardson Case

Open Document