ipl-logo

Hillary Trump Debate Essay

647 Words3 Pages

How a candidate addresses an issue can either benefit them in positive manner or tear them down in tremendously, and because of that the candidate has to always answer the question with some sort of strategy. When in debate the candidate needs to not only be respectful to the other candidate to not come across negative and rude, but also the candidate need to keep in mind that it is a competition and that you want to win. Depending on the issue the way a candidate answers a question can vary from many different responses of the audience. Keeping the audience in mind the candidate wants to make sure not to offend the majority of the audience, because it may impact negatively in the voting. While watching the debate I saw that both Hillary …show more content…

It seemed that the tone and the way they spoke towards and about each other depended on how much they agreed or disagreed with each other. Throughout the debate it was seen repeatedly that when at any point that when either Hillary or Trump disagreed with what the other candidate said by talking over them, when it wasn’t their time to speak which resulted to both of them arguing repeatedly throughout the debate. Although when watching the debate, you could see that when they agreed debate went smoothly which allowed them both to get more acrossed. Both candidates had both some strong and weak moments throughout the debate. Hillary was very consistent throughout the debate and didn’t really fall short on any topic, which showed that she was prepared and throughout the whole debate you saw the consistency. Trump however also had some very strong points during the beginning He was making some great points and was able to back them up, but after a while it seemed that he was lacking something towards the middle and end of the debate, because he seemed a little redundant. After a while Trump seemed to just repeat things over and over, avoid answering the question the mediator was trying to ask him. The way Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump spoke and acted is how they want to portray themselves and personally I feel HIllary had did a better job at doing

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

Sandra Fluke’s opinion over this matter has impacted many people and she has, by some means, persuaded numerous people to agree with her opinion on this argument. On the other hand, Limbaugh lost many advertisers and suffered a major loss on his radio talk show. Duffy states how important it is to know how to speak in well-manner style in an argument if you want to accurately get your message across. The author states that college students need to know how to act in a mature manner when having an argument about a certain topic. Duffy talks about how students should have the capability to understand that when confronting an argument there must be evidence to back up the argument.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

In order for her speech to be more effective she could work on balancing out her viewpoints and making it a bit more organized. Moreover, she would have benefited more from a shorter speech rather than trying to filibuster the

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

However, there is still another layer to FDR's speech which is delivery. With FDR’s structure and words combined he was able to deliver the speech and convey confidence. FDR’s language was to the point. According to the article Rhetoric Revisited: FDR’s “infamy” Speech, “Roosevelt prided himself on using direct language” and while this causes his language to become bland, in this speech it highlighted important words and phrases needed to get his point across to the audience

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

On October 6, the first debate started. It took place in Hartford, Connecticut, and it gave the presidential candidates the chance to put forth their views on education, the economy, medicare, and tax cuts. Clinton took advantage for improving the economy and slashing the budget deficit. Dole challenged Clinton’s approach to foreign affairs, and he also challenged Clinton’s record on crime and spending and proposed a whopping tax cut of more than $550 billion. The debate was secular of personal attacks.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to arguments, debates, and anything else, you must do and say tailored things in order to show your point or justify how you're right. Comparable to the debate during the 1980 US presidential election, the two candidates, current President Jimmy Carter and California Governor Ronald Reagan, participated in a debate over how they would address inflation if elected, and they did so to persuade the public to vote for them in the election. In the debate, Ronald Reagan had a better argument because of what he said and how he said it. Firstly, in the debate about inflation, Ronald Reagan had a more compelling argument because he used evidence in the form of statistics.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

He glanced down at his papers, but made good eye contact and talked directly to the people when he looked up. His tone changed with the importance of the words and phrases he was saying and the points he was trying to make. He also used well placed pauses that emphasize and add importance to what he is saying. He made hand gestures which are mostly hidden by the podium until the end of his

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Rubio said in the opening of his speech. This statement made it obvious that he is against Clinton becoming president. His opening statement showed a form of ethos by presenting how most of the Republican community feels

Read More
1704 Words | 7 Pages

How we think and feel during a speech is often the result of the words a speaker uses and the tone they take. Clinton’s speech had a very specific goal of showing the audience that he was humble and sorrowful, and garner sympathy and forgiveness so that the president could continue holding his status. Clinton used many techniques and his own charisma and personality to drive the speech to be as influential, and be as memorable, as it is. Its masterful use of language and the careful presentation created a lasting impression that Americans today can reference when discerning what is really being said when a politicians

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

The third Republican Debate is now in the books, after the top 10 leading GOP candidates debated for more than two hours. There are now less than 100 days until the first ballots are cast. This debate was a very important for many of the candidates campaigns because they are now approaching the “make-or-break point” of their campaigns (Diamond). Only a few candidates rose to the occasion and gave a strong performance that could boost their standings in the polls. Other candidates did not leave very happy from the debate.

Read More
264 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that, yes it would have an adverse effect on a presidential election because the more debates a democratic party or republican party has means that the public and other party members have time to learn about the candidates and the issues that candidate supports. For example if a person like Donald trump which is on the republican party goes outside to a lot of debates and shows he’s not afraid he could outshine his competition in debates and even win more votes over the democratic party that has its main runner Hillary Clinton at a disadvantage with less debate time. Yes debates influence candidate selection during elations because the person decided who to vote for knows the side they want, and they know what that candidate thinks

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

Presidential candidates should answer how they truly feel and what they know about a topic instead of dodging or attacking the question like an ex-girlfriend. We Americans put our faith in the president to keep the country flourishing, safe, and great. In this democratic debate, Hillary Clinton used the red herring fallacy and the ad hominem fallacy. In the end, everyone can see right through her answers. All that people have to do is pay attention to how she answered these questions and they would be able to understand they are

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

Hillary Clinton uses a lot of language that uplifts and bring the American people together. She says, “America is great because America is good.” Clinton is using positive language and good terms to talk about her country and the people apart of it. She is using charismatic terms to describe her country. This helps Clinton to persuade the audience to listen to her following points, she is using charismatic words to capture the attention and make her point.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

There have been people to say Trump is ignorant or non-intelligent and to easily be angered. It just so happened that tonight he did the opposite of that. Very calmly he addressed issues, articulated, and limited outburst to a minimum. Although Hilary had an articulate advantage throughout the course of the event, because she knows how to speak better, how too politic

Read More
2047 Words | 9 Pages

I. Introduction Donald Trump: American Hero or Villain? For many Americans, Trump is seen as the long-awaited saviour of the nation. Others see him as the man to start World War III.

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

The debate between The Democratic versus The Republicans was interesting because they went in depth about the main issues happening around the country. The first topic in which they were discussing about was the American military spending. The Democratic talked about that America has to cut their military budget because they are spending almost 500 billion dollars. They were arguing that the U.S military needs to cut the budget because we were spending so much more than China and Russia combine.

Read More

More about Hillary Trump Debate Essay

Related Topics

Open Document