One should always have the right to make decisions on their own. There is a point in a person’s circle where another person’s input is appreciated and sometimes accepted. It is still up to the person to go forward or refrain from their decisions. In “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway, the story involves two characters the American and “Jig” which to the interpretation of the story leaves us to the imagination that they are facing a possible abortion. With time progressing in the story we can see the struggle that Jig is faced with, and if whether she must go forward with this operation or not is unclear.
The story is told in a third person’s point of view and there is limited information given. We also do not know the exact
…show more content…
To the point on how she should feel about the operation and the fact that it is not a big deal. Almost as if she was getting something simple done like for instance a cleansing or something of that sort. The more Jig thinks about this the more she is convinced that maybe she should not go through the abortion, and the conflict between them continues. They are both trying to convince each other of the opposite.
We can learn from the story, that while he was taking the bags to the other side of the train station, he admired her from a distance sitting at the table and she smiled at him. I want to think that he really loves her and will not do anything to harm her and especially make her do something she does not want to do. Maybe he is having a change of heart to this whole conflict. As a reader, this story will still seem unclear because there are details that we still do not know. Like their background or the longevity of their