Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hippie movement
By understanding to this killing someone this early, and that men in the war do unspeakable things partly because of impulse but mainly because of peer pressure from other men, Tim O’Brien suggests that the greatest fear of all soldiers is not death or killing but simple embarrassment of feeling emasculated. By pinning the unnecessary deaths of his friends, especially Kiowa, on these false notions of obligation that the men have to bear, Tim O’Brien suggests that the greatest tragedy of the Vietnam War is not its violence but its ability to inspire compliance among the
The dirty hippie is easy to spot. They are the person with hair down their back, wearing a tie-dye shirt and blue jeans and may or may not be listening to The Grateful Dead in their heads. But take caution, the hippie can lure vulnerable adolescents from their homes and coerce them into living the Flower-child lifestyle. Who are these social outcasts who have been spreading love, flower power and an aversion to showers?
The Vietnam War spanning over two decades was a complex conflict that was fought through America’s outlook of containing communism in Europe. The multifaceted perspectives of the Vietnam War and unclear military objectives caused confusion for soldiers. As a result, a majority of soldiers felt pushed into a war that they didn’t fully understand, leading to lifelong psychological consequences. Although many believe soldiers are fearless and can tolerate the trauma of war, in The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien illuminates the underlying effects of war on soldiers that aren't immediately apparent to the naked eye, highlighting the physical and emotional struggles within soldiers' daily lives. O’Brien’s use of figurative language immerses readers
Most soldiers in the Vietnam War felt the shame of resisting war as, “Men Killed and died because they were embarrassed not to,” (21). For this reason, soldiers adopted cowardice towards themselves if their morals were not towards the Vietnam War. Society creates a margin where there is cowardice with choosing and not choosing to go to war. O’Brien reflects on this by saying, “I understood that I would not do what I should do,” (57), “I was a coward. I went to war,”
I find Ho Chi Minh’s letter far more persuasive than Lyndon B. Johnson’s. Using ethos, pathos, and logos, he forms a solid argument that supports Vietnam’s stance on the war. He appeals to one’s emotions by expressing the injustices faced by his people, writing, “In South Viet-Nam a half-million American soldiers and soldiers from the satellite countries have resorted to the most barbarous methods of warfare, such as napalm, chemicals, and poison gases in order to massacre our fellow countrymen, destroy the crops, and wipe out villages.” Words such as “massacre” and “barbarous” highlight the severity of these crimes, and invoke feelings of guilt and remorse in the reader. Chi Minh uses ethos to support his logos, or logical, views on the
For young people, the Vietnam War is a thing of the past that they can only learn about it from second hand sources. In Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, it becomes very apparent that the Vietnam conflict has proved to be one that many of the participants have not been able move away from. Throughout the 60s people were constantly fighting for their rights as citizens to protest war. It was more common than not for soldiers to never return home and many tried to keep the youth from going. The 60s was a time for change, a time for people to stand up for what they believe.
I have never wanted to be out of a place more than Vietnam. The place filled me with dread and I have never known the kind of fear I felt there any place else.” (The Vietnam War: A History in Documents, Document
To them, Vietnam was just a small country in the middle of nowhere that posed no threat to the United States or world peace; because of this they moved from “village to village, without purpose, nothing won or lost” (O’Brien 1306). However, when the soldiers in this story lost a comrade with nothing to show for it, everything became pointless. A study showed that there are “strong associations between combat loss and psychological maladjustment in analysis of NVVRS ” (Currier). This is seen in “The Things They Carried”
On April 4, 1967 Doctor Martin Luther King Jr gave the speech, “Beyond Vietnam-A time to Break Silence.” In this powerful speech Dr. King addresses his followers, and explains why the same people who are advocating for civil rights, should also protest the war in Vietnam. Dr. King’s main appeal is towards pathos because he is explaining his reasons, most of which are moral in some way. Dr. King develops the central claim of the speech by explaining how the war is taking away resources from the poor, how the soldiers are disproportionately poor people, and lastly how the war is completely against his morals. His central claim of the speech revolves around war being an enemy of the poor.
For many years India struggled greatly for their independence. The three major events in the Indian fight against British rule were: the Golden Temple Massacre, the Salt March, and the homespun movement. During the Temple Massacre British and Gurkha troops killed at least 379 unarmed Indians meeting at the Jallianwala Bagh, to discuss nonviolent resistance and protest. However, the British had passed a law that said they were forbidden from encouraging and having meetings about nonviolent protests. The Salt March, which took place in India, was an act of civil disobedience.
Hippies were a big impact on youth culture in the 60s. The hippies represented freedom and having fun. The style of the hippies is well known today, “many wore their hair long and dressed in casual, often unconventional, clothes, sometimes in “psychedelic” colors.” (Hippie 3). People such as the Beatles and the Rolling Stones were closely identified with the movement also.
Soldiers were dying, and they continued to be sent over to fight. The war itself provided a major wave of anti-war rhetoric that is still prominent today. The anti-war rhetoric was pushed through politicians, celebrities, concerts, protests, average citizens of different economic classes, but most importantly through song. “In the 1960s, several now-influential artists appealed to the disaffected counterculture’s emphasis on peace and love, especially with the sliding approval rates of the Vietnam War. As public approval of the Vietnam War dwindled in the latter half of the 1960s, popular music artists began to record songs that reflected this disapproval and ultimately became a new method of protest (Hopkins).”
They performed on day two of the Woodstock festival. They started at 10:30 in the morning on Saturday the 16th. They played for 95 minutes. Their equipment squashed the turnable stage. Then the rain started flooding the stage.
The American counterculture is not just a movement, it is an entire generation’s attempt to rebel against the cultural ideas that had previously taken root in America. Many members of the counterculture were raised in just after World War II, which also means that they grew up at a time when the economy was booming. This affluence led to many counterculture supports losing interest in the material necessities of life, unlike their parents who would have grown up in or around the time of the Great Depression. Members of the counterculture preferred to live a life that was not chained down by responsibilities. They abandoned the idea of settling down with a home and a nine to five job; instead, members drifted from place to place, experimented
Introduction Narratives have been the basis for all human communication and progress throughout our existence. Good narratives can inspire and drive us to new heights we’ve never reached, while also putting our vast world into the perspective of others around the world. Stories have been told for millennia and the most famous can turn into legends, myths, or sometimes start whole religions. For this criticism I will attempt to answer the basic question; what makes a good story?