ipl-logo

State Sovereignty In International Law

1193 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: ESSAY ON THOmas hobbes view of state

The current international scenario is dynamic in nature, full of interstate interactions and full of subjects (if you can call them subjects under traditional international law) that are not states. After the Peace of Westphalia —and even prior to that— the “sovereignty” of states has been the driving force of most international relations; consequently, the states were considered to be the only subjects of intentional law disregarding individuals as subjects of international law. Another major issue of international law that derives form the notion of state sovereignty is law enforcement; because there is nothing above state sovereignty, and states should be regarded as the only subjects of international law, enforcement of treaties becomes …show more content…

For purposes of this paper, Thomas Hobbes’s theory will be the one mainly contrasted. Thomas Hobbes was an English political theorist who put forward theories on state sovereignty, individual rights and human nature in his work Leviathan (1651). Throughout his work (Leviathan), Hobbes poses that before political society men lived under a state of nature. Under this state of nature, humans lived under a perpetual fear, progress was overall inexistent and death would be a common phenomenon; basically, every man had the right to survive by any means necessary, including murder. Because of this perpetual state of fear, humans would resort to giving all their inherent rights to a supreme being in exchange for protection. The accumulation of all the natural rights of men would be the Leviathan, a sea monster that had all the power and rights of its own. According to Hobbes’ theory, this was the birth of the state, which had the right and obligation to rule over its subjects. Looking on this theory more broadly, we could imagine the world filled with different Leviathans (states) that were ruled by the same principles as humans had done before their creation, the state of nature. This state of nature allowed the new states to have the same right of survival that the humans had before, meaning that they could wage …show more content…

This international body was created by the enactment of the Charter of the United Nations, which stated that its main function was the maintenance of peace, recognised that its power came from the states that created it and firmly stressed the importance of the sovereignty of each nation. By accepting the importance of state sovereignty, the UN recognises state superiority and accepted its role as both guardian and mediator. More importantly, it looked for peace by engaging on a contractual agreement, or treaty, in which each nation refrain from using their natural state rights; meaning that instead of giving up their rights as “Leviathans” to a bigger entity, the states simply agreed that they would restraint from using them. To ensure that this principle was met, the UN created two bodies: the Security Council and The International Court of Justice (ICJ). The main purpose of the Security Council is peace keeping through any means necesary; consequently it is the only body that can violate the sovereignty of a nation. The structure of the Council consist of five permanent members with individual veto powers and ten rotating ones. One might argue that the five veto system breaks the equality principle of the United Nations in which every country has equal rights and obligations regardless of their power. This is because of the fact that there is the need to acknowledge superior military

Show More
Related
707 Words | 3 Pages

The country has a new viewpoint of peace and joins other countries to create the United Nations, as a way to keep world peace and settle foreign affairs. “The United States now exerts a tremendous influence in the cause of peace throughout all the world” (Document F). Additionally, the charter for the United Nations was signed on June 26, 1945 and came into force on October 24, 1945. “We the peoples of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind” (Document G). America agreed to this union to prevent another war from affecting the

Read More
1616 Words | 7 Pages

United Nations, United Nations,

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

The Grapes of Wrath is widely thought of as the best piece of American literature. The book follows Tom Joad and his development as a character. Over the course of the book, Tom develops from a selfish and rude person to a considerate and noble one. At the beginning of the book, Steinbeck portrays Tom as selfish and rude.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

There were many philosophers in the 17th and 18th century that influenced and inspired the founders of our country. For instance, John Locke believed that life, liberty, and property should be our natural rights as humans and if the government could not secure these rights then the people could get rid of them. That idea impacted Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. This was the perfect time to develop different theories and contradictions because this was right around the time of the printing press and protestant reformation where people started to question the catholic church. Other philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau impacted founders like George Washington and James Madison who have positively affected this country in many different ways.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

Established in 1945 after the World War II, United Nations Security Council is the most powerful organ among the six organs in United Nations with the authorized power to issue legally binding resolutions. This council consists of 15 members, 5 Permanent Members – the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China – and 10 Non-Permanent Members voted by the UNGA for 2 years term. According to the charter, the responsibility of UNSC is to maintain international peace and security. It determines the threat to peace and act of aggressor; moreover, it investigates any disputes between the UN Member states. The United Nations Security Council also has the military force to prevent or stop the aggressor.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

This I Am I believe that competitive cheerleading taught me how to believe in myself. I couldn’t count how many times I have told myself that I could not do something. When I was twelve-years old I took up a love for competitive cheerleading. Every time I told myself I couldn’t do something, I wouldn’t even try.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes developed the ‘social contract theory’, which is the idea that civilians give up some of their freedom and liberty for protection from the leader. This concept, which was used during Hobbes’s time, is still a part of the government today. Hobbes brings down this concept in his world famous book, Leviathan. A picture of a ‘giant’ monarch holding onto a tiny world is used to describe his version of the social contract. The drawing depicts the trade of freedom for safety.

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Thus, both men would evaluate the statement that “in a legitimate state all men are free and there is no inequality,” differently. Rousseau would mostly disagree, holding that the state itself is the impetus for inequality. Hobbes would largely agree, contending that men are equal both in a primitive state of conflict and under a sovereign’s awesome power. These different responses result from the philosophers’ opposing views on fundamental human nature, civil society’s raison d’etre, and government’s inevitable form. --- Rousseau begins his

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

This state of nature was the conditions in which we lived before there were any political governments to rule over us and it described what societies would be like if we had no government at all. In this essay I will compare the opinions given by each philosopher regarding their understanding of the state and the law. I will also discuss how their theories have influenced our understanding of the law today. Thomas Hobbes – Regarding the State and Law Firstly I would like to begin my discussion with Thomas Hobbes.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

The United Nations has an importance in addressing the issues on global, economic and social issues since United Nations is the one who is implementing policies among states when they are signatory to this. Thus, the Charter of United Nations helps to keep the international placidity and sanctuary; to obtain a potent general measures for the suppression of indication of danger on peace. It also gives policy on a settlement of international disputes among territory. It also recuperates better relations between nations on the basis of self determination and equal rights.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Firstly, an absolute monarchy as proposed by Hobbes would require that people relinquish their own rights and to submit to one absolute power, which Locke feels is counterintuitive his understand of humans in the state of nature. A distinctive feature of Locke’s state of nature is perfect freedom for people to carry out their own wills without hindrance. Hence, Locke’s main critique of Hobbes’ absolutism is that people living under a Hobbesian

Read More
2404 Words | 10 Pages

TRUE SENSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: The controversy whether international law is a law or not resolves on the divergent definitions of the word “law” given by the jurist. If we subscribe to the view of Hobbes, Austin and Pufendorf, that law is a command of sovereign enforced by a superior political authority then international law cannot be included in the category of law. On the other hand if, we subscribe to the view that the term“law”cannot be limited to rules enacted by superior political authority, then international law can be included in the category of law. Lawrence aptly remarked that everything depends upon the definition of law which we choose to adopt.

Read More
1655 Words | 7 Pages

On the 24th of October 1945, the United Nations officially came into existence. On that day, representatives of 50 countries met in San Francisco at a United Nations Conference on International Organization to draw up and sign the United Nations Charter (UN, History of the United Nations). The United Nations Charter is a document that states what the United Nations is. In Chapter 1, “PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES Article 1” one of the points states that a purpose of the UN is to keep international unity and to remove anything that threatens peace (Nations, 1945). Even though at first international laws may seem to only include human rights, they are much more complex and they affect us in many different ways.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

It acts as a criminal court, watchdog court, world security court, reparations court and law maker. In our discussion, we will discuss in details of the role of ICC. It is an undisputed fact that ICC acted as a criminal court. In the Declaration adopted at the meeting, States recognized "the role of the International Criminal Court in a multilateral system that aims to end impunity and establish the rule of law”.

Read More

More about State Sovereignty In International Law

Related Topics

Open Document