Hobbes Vs Rousseau

440 Words2 Pages
According to Rousseau, these factors are not natural but are developed or have evolved throughout history. Unlike Hobbes, Rousseau describes the natural man as isolated, timid and peaceful. Rousseau acknowledges that self-preservation is one principle for human actions, but unlike stated by Hobbes, it is not the only principle. Rousseau concludes that self-preservation or self-interest is just one of two principles of the human soul. The second principle is pity. It may seem that Rousseau’s depiction of a natural man is one that makes them no different from other animals, but he says that they have reason, unlike animals, though it is not fully developed in the state if nature. But it is this reason that makes the transition from the state