ipl-logo

Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

1437 Words6 Pages

COMPARISON BETWEEN TO THOMAS HOPPES AND JOHN LOCKE VIEWS ON STATE OF NATURE

Introduction
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) were both political philosophers. They are mainly known for their master pieces on political philosophy. I.e. Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Two Treatise of Government. Each of them has different views and perspective of the State of Nature and Social Contract. State of Nature is the condition under which men lived prior to the formation of societies which may be considered as an historical fact or a hypothetical claim" (Steele, 1993). That is, the condition that men lived before the formation of legitimate government. Social contract on the other hand, is the hypothesis that one's moral obligations are dependent upon an implicit agreement between individuals to form a society (Celeste, 2004). Both Hobbes and Locke used social contract as a means of explaining their Ideas on the origin …show more content…

Hobbes viewed state of nature as a state of war. According to Hobbes, in a state of nature, there is no right to property because no one affords another that right. He stated that property and possessions would inevitably cause men to become enemies. Hobbes believes that people have equal physical and mental ability to harm, and that people will do so for three reasons - competition, difference, and glory. " so that in the state of nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel, first, competition; secondly, difference; thirdly, glory" (Hobbes 2008, p.85). Hobbes believes that there is no room for society because when there is no safety, nobody takes steps to improve their lives. " In such condition, there is no place for industry because the fruit thereof is uncertain (Hobbes, p.

Show More
Related
109 Words | 1 Pages

Comparing Hobbes and Locke Hobbes and Locke have many similar and different. some similarities are they both believed the natural state of mankind before forming a government is the State of Nature. Another is divine rights or social contract?

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

In John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, a large topic of discussion is the state of nature. In Leviathan Hobbes has a more negative, but realistic perspective of the state of nature than Locke does in the Second Treatise. Hobbes believes that the state of nature is a “war of every man against every man. ”(34) Locke, however, believes that the state of nature is a “state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes thinks humans are inherently selfish and competitive creatures, and that they will stop at nothing to get what they want. The state of nature is a state of anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos. Hobbes does believe the state of nature is a good way to live. You have no protection or peace of mind. Your property could be taken from you at any moment, someone could try and kill.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Hobbes believed that the state of law state of law represented a state of permanent war, which posed as a risk to individuals. Hobbes tries to portray humans as selfish individuals who only care about there own priorities. According to Hobbes, a person’s life is most threatened in the state of nature, and the very core interest of every person is to survive and ensure the “preservation of his own nature. Hobbes also believes that the only reason men give up their authority is to find common ground through peace instead of going to war. On the other Locke trusts the condition of nature is a state of "perfect freedom" and equity, not a condition of certain confusion and defilement.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

During the seventeenth and eighteenth century, there was a change in the thought process of mankind. Two prominent and opposing viewpoints came in the form of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thomas Hobbes was a man who influenced society’s thoughts on government. John Locke, on the other hand, had a heavy and lasting influence in the shaping of modern politics, the nature of individual rights, and the views on human nature. Hobbes and Locke both derived two states of nature that though they had some similarities were polar opposites.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke is an enlightened political philosopher whose explanations to his ideas remains profoundly influential. Locke believes people should have the right to do anything they want without the government enforcing them to do a task. In The Second Treatise, Locke discusses some vital concepts of his thinking, beginning with a discussion of the State of Nature. He explains that humans move from a state of nature characterized by perfect freedom and are governed by reason to a civil government in which the authority is vested in a legislative and executive power. In the State of Nature, men are born equal, to have perfect liberty to maintain.

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

During the enlightenment period of political philosophy, the State-of-Nature was a theory devised to portray the nature of man before society. In both Hobbes’ and Locke’s arguments, they explain how a transition into society changes man as well as how this transition comes about. While they both agree with the theory of the existence of the State-of-Nature and that man transitions from the State-of-Nature into society through a covenant, their arguments on what is the State-of-Nature, differ greatly. While Locke’s Second Treatise is not a response to Hobbes, it inadvertently analyzes some of Hobbes’ arguments.

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

According to Hobbes, the state of nature he described and supposed to be men’s condition when they have no sovereign over them. He did mean to assert that men have ever actually lived in such a condition without any form of government or society and he did mean that he obviously altogether mistaken, since as far back as we go in human history we find evidence of social and communal living. Hobbes himself expressed himself very loosely on this point because he was not much

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Hobbes lived through the English Civil War where religion and its influence on authority, produced conflict. To understand why the war occurred, Hobbes began to observe humans in what he called their “State of Nature”. Hobbes concluded that nature without society resulted in war. Without the state, humans proved to be naturally selfish, competitive, greedy, and brutish with impulsive tendencies. To intervene war and human impulsiveness, a state was required to regulate society and sustain social order.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Summary Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) theory of social contract, which states that we need moral, legal rules because we want to escape the state of nature which is solitary, poor, brutal, nasty, and short. In this state, a man can kill others, and there are limited resources. This can soon lead to a state of war in which we are constantly disposed to harm others to achieve our goals. So, in this state of war if a person was to possess a beautiful house or property, and had all the comforts, luxuries, and amenities to lead a wonderful life; others could come and harm him and deprive him of his fruit of labor, life, and liberty. Therefore, the state of nature is that of fear, violence, and distrust.

Read More
4122 Words | 17 Pages

FINAL EXAMINATION 1) Explain rule of self-preservation, property, and laws of nature in John Locke's State of Nature. (2 points) Above many of the concepts that John Locke introduces in his writing, The Second Treatise of Government, he introduces us to a “State of Nature”, a state with no government that is ruled instead by what he calls “Natural Laws” based on reason and self preservation as well as a state of equality and liberty, that is defined by the fact that all people are born equal and no one has any legitimate authority over the other and are free to do as they please. Locke makes difference of Natural Liberty and Social Liberty, the first being living entirely under the laws of nature and not any government or legislative ruling

Read More
1529 Words | 7 Pages

The state of nature is a concept of philosophy used in religion, cultural, and socio-economic terms to demonstrate the conditions of what the lives of people might have been like before societies came into existence. When identifying this on a general level, the state of nature is the predicaments in which humans interacted and how they react to those situations of ethical and moral grounds. The importance behind this theory is very impactful. The state of nature is identifiable within a situation without government, employed in social contract theory in order to justify political authority.

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Hobbes holds that “it is impossible to subjugate a man without first having placed him in the position of being unable to do without another.” Thus, the lack of organizational interdependence in primitive society prevents inequality. Similarly, the lawlessness of early society makes conflict impossible: war “can exist neither in the state of nature, where there is no stable property.”

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau have become known as three of the most prominent political theorists in the world today. Their philosophies and innovative thinking is known worldwide and it has influenced the creation of numerous new governments. All three thinkers agree on the idea of a social contract but their opinions differ on how the social contract is established and implemented within each society. These philosophers state, that in order for the social contract to be successful people need to give up certain freedoms in order to secure fundamental protections from the state, henceforth the state then has certain responsibilities to their citizens. Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau all believe that before men were governed we all lived in a state of nature.

Read More

More about Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

Related Topics

Open Document