How Did European Culture And Culture Influence The Spread Of Trade Networks Dbq

1149 Words5 Pages

Between the years 1000 and 1450, trade networks, were rapidly being established throughout Africa, Asia, and Europe and becoming increasingly successful. The main idea of adjusting to culture by the Europeans differed heavily from the Muslims idea of spreading and influencing culture, which resulted in the Europeans suffering some cultural consequences. The documents imply that the Muslims culture was able to spread further while having a greater impression on travelers than the Europeans culture, which was focused on the exploration of other cultures and religious conversion.

The Muslim culture was able to spread its culture, while trying to succeed in new surroundings, which allowed it to be spread further than the Europeans culture was …show more content…

Document 7 shows the spread of the Mongol Empire within a large part of Asia and some outer parts of Europe. The Mongols, who were Muslim, participated heavily in trade which helped spread the religion to all the places they traveled. Document 10 shows the main trade routes in Europe, with some starting in the mostly Muslim populated parts of Asia. It also shows how the routes connected to the city Tunis of Northern Africa, which was a Muslim city that connected three of the main medieval trade routes. All three of the documents above shows exactly where the Muslims were able to trade and spread their religion, and show how the Muslim culture was able to spread at a quick rate, due to having the purpose of establishing their culture in new places. Documents 1 and 6 are descriptions of how Muslims affected Africa, told through the eyes of unbiased outsiders who were comparing the culture to their own back home. In document 1 the outsider states that the Islamic culture was quickly and successfully influencing Africa due to intermarriage. It also talks about the impact the Muslims established with their traditions, like veiling. Document 6 is an explanation of how Muslims …show more content…

The Europeans, who were more focused on forcing religion than trade, were often close minded to relying solely on their own ideas when it came to trade and production of certain products, which resulted in some cultural consequences. Documents 3 and 5 show some of these consequences, while document 11 shows an example of the Europeans not forcing religion, and the positive outcome that came with that. In document 3 an outsider makes his way in China where Christianity was almost not present, with the mission to convert as many people as possible. Unlike Muslims, Christians tried to force their religion onto others, which was usually not successful, exactly like in this case. Document 5 is a Christians’ biased view on markets in Europe and how it goes against Christianity. This specific person was pretty high in the ranks, therefore his opinion meant a great amount to his other fellow Christians who were taking part in the markets. His words basically prohibited the use of trading and spreading their religion with other cultures. The belief that markets were “demonic” resulted in the cultural consequence of having a more limited platform to share their culture with others. When the Europeans did the opposite of what