ipl-logo

How Did John Marshall Have The Power Of The Supreme Court

1165 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: A major effect of john marshall's supreme court decisions was to

When the Constitution was written and the United States Government formed it consisted of three branches, the Executive, the bicameral Legislative, and the Judicial branch. When the United States Supreme Court was revealed in February 1790 it was little more than an appeals court. It had little power, and met but twice per year. The judicial branch was the weakest of the three branches. It consisted of six justices, with one being the Chief Justice. It did not make bold rulings or take on any cases of controversy. That would change when John Marshall became Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. It was transformed into a powerfully equal branch of the Federal Government. Over the next 34 years this one man, Chief Justice John Marshall …show more content…

Marshall did not want Jefferson to have his way or vice versa. However, at that point in time the United States Supreme Court had little to no power, other than that of an appeals court. The question before the court was did the Supreme Court have the power to issue a writ of mandamus? Marshall knew that Madison would refuse to deliver the appointments and then the court would not have the power to make him do so. The other issue was if he did not issue the writ then Jefferson would have his way. Marshall came up with an ingenious way of deciding the case and would forever change the Supreme Court into a coequal branch of the government. After ignoring the rule of jurisdiction, Marshall stated that once a President signed a commission and the Secretary of State had recorded them then the appointments were complete. It was also ruled that a writ of mandamus was the appropriate instrument in which to use to accomplish the delivery of the appointments by the Secretary of State. At this point it looks as it Marbury will get his appointment. In spite of this, Marshall then has to answer the question as to whether or not the Supreme Court has the authority to issue the writ. He concluded it did not. The Court having also found that the Judicial Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore null and void. Marshall was refusing to have the Court enter into a political issue on “the grounds that Congress could not constitutionally grant to the Court powers not authorized by the Constitution.” Thus this case established Judicial

Show More
Related
823 Words | 4 Pages

In regards to Maryland's argument of state sovereignty, Chief Justice Marshall argued that the Constitution is "an instrument of the people". Although, it was ratified by the state conventions it is for the people, not the states. Lastly, Marshall stated that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy", which was a direct attack to the federal government. There were no concurrent opinions written for this

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

John Marshall altered the Court’s position within the constitutional system and engaged a dynamic battle to sustain the federal authority over the interstate business and in dealings between the states and the federal government. This he did during the thirty-four years he was the chief justice and to date is a legacy in the Court’s history. Marbury v. Madison (1803) marked the commencing of Marshall’s record of achievement in which he justified the Court’s supremacy of judicial review - the rule to assess the constitutionality of state laws and other actions of the government - and put down the foundations of national constitutional jurisprudence. In Fletcher v. Peck (1810), Marshall alleged that a land grant was a contract that a government

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court who also served as Secretary of State during John Adams presidency. John Marshall was the man in charge of having the appointees commissioned during his time as President Adams Secretary of State. William Marbury took his case to the Supreme Court and demanded a writ of mandamus challenging James Madison. John Marshall the man who could not get William Marbury his commission before Adams’ presidential time ran out would now be ruling over the

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

Under the Judiciary Act of 1801, Marbury sued Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. He was asking the Court to force Madison to accept the appointment. The court denied and held that it lacked strength because the section of the Judiciary Act passed by Congress in 1789 authorized the Court to issue such a writ was invalid. Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution must always

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Marshall advanced Federalism and the thoughts of the Federalist Party. His powerful decisions molded American government, making the Supreme Court the last judge of Constitutional. During his time

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

This case dealt with William Marbury not receiving his commission to be the justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, in 1800. Before the end of his term as president, John Adams appointed many members of his political party to serve in different government position. John Marshall, whom was the Secretary of State under President John Adams, was required to deliver those commissions to the appointed judges, but he failed to deliver the commissions to William Marbury and a few others before leaving office. When the newly elected president, Thomas Jefferson took office in 1801, he informed James Madison, his Secretary of State not

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

He argued that, by law, Madison must deliver his notice and that Jefferson must allow him to take his position. In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Marbury had the right to his position but that the court could not force Jefferson or Congress to give it to him. The Supreme Court ruled the Judiciary Act of 1801 unconstitutional. This was

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

He expanded the power of the Supreme Court by declaring that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the Supreme Court Justices were the final deciders. In the Marbury vs. Madison case, Marshall wrote "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” John Marshall was clearly in favor of judicial power, and believed that the Supreme Court should have the final say in cases involving an interpretation of the Constitution. While establishing this, he kept the separation of powers in mind, as he wanted equal representation among the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches. In the Marbury vs. Madison, John Marshall declared that the Judicial Branch could not force Madison to deliver the commission.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

He stated that the Constitution did not give the Supreme Court the authority to issue writs of mandamus, arguing that Section 13 of the act was inconsistent with Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution which granted the right to do so. As a result of the decision of this case, by Marshall’s assertion of Judicial Review, the Court began its promotion as an equal branch of government, equal in power to the President and Congress. In the first instance, President Adams appointed certain number of justices of peace for the District of Columbia.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

So Marshall denied the petition and refused to issue the writ. In section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 it notes that writs can indeed be issued, but that particular section of the act was not consistent with the Constitution, making it invalid. I believe that John Marshall implemented this final decision because it was first of all highly appropriate, as well as it more or less was a good solution for both parties. Yes, Marbury deserved to have his commission but the lawsuit was not necessarily an appropriate way to go about receiving it. Marshall knew that if he were going to protect the power of the Supreme Court then he would have to declare the act

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

Three Branches Research Project The United States of America began in 1776, and during the first 11 years of the young nation’s existence its mechanisms were governed by the Articles of Confederation. This disorganized document was riddled with inefficient policies creating more disunity than synergy prompting the drafting of the Constitution. The Constitution as we know today wasn’t ratified until June 21, 1788.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

He wanted the court to present a clear opinion on the matters. With Marshalls outspoken personality, most justices followed his views. But his views were not always followed by everyone. His view was shot down in the case of Ogden v. Saunders of 1827. His interpretation of the Constitution was this, “To say that the intention of the instrument must prevail, that this intention must be collected from its words, that its words are to be understood in the sense in which that are generally used by those for whom the instrument was intended.

Read More
388 Words | 2 Pages

There are three key turning points in the history of federal courts those are, the U.S Constitution, th Judiciary Act of 1789, and the Judiciary Act of 1891. When it comes to the Constitution, it did not create America 's courts, for the reason that courts were already in place and operating before the Constitution. However, the U.S Constitution spelled out the structures and functions of the Judiciary in Article III. The first governing document in the United States was the Articles of Confederation. This document had a very short history, and that showed that it was lacking in several aspects.

Read More
1324 Words | 6 Pages

Justice Thurgood Marshall Response Justice Thurgood Marshall said in his “Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution”, “I do not believe the meaning of the Constitution was forever ‘fixed’ at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, that we hold as fundamental as today” (Marshall). In this passage of his essay, Judge Marshall is critical of the government that is

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

Read More

More about How Did John Marshall Have The Power Of The Supreme Court

Related Topics

Open Document