ipl-logo

How Did King Alexander Conquer India

428 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Macedonia strengths alexander the great

Introduction 1. Alexander became the ruler of Macedon in 336 BC taking over from his father Phillip II. Immediately after taking over, he conquered all of Greece defeating powerful armies of Sparta and Athenia. His greed for wealth, power, recognition and prestige took him to the mighty Kingdom of Persia and on the pretext of avenging attack by the Persian ruler Xerxes in 480 BC, he engaged the mighty Persians in three major battles. The brilliant strategist and ferocious commander Alexander was, he was knocking the doors of India by 326 BC. 2. In his quest to conquer India, Alexander met with the first and by the fiercest resistance from King Porus of the Kingdom of Pauravas located east of the river Hydaspes (present Jhelum) river in 326 …show more content…

The aim of the paper is to describe and analyse the Battle of Hydaspes fought in 326 BC between the Macedonian army led by Alexander and the army of Paurvas led by King Porus. Background 4. In 326 BC, the Northern part of Indian subcontinent comprising of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Bihar was ruled by the Nanda empire and the fertile land of Punjab was ruled by several kings fighting amongst themselves. In order to enter India, Alexander had to cross two major rivers of Indus and Jhelum (Hydaspes). The Kingdom of Eastern Gandhara located between these two major rivers was ruled by King Ambhi. 5. When Alexander challenged King Ambhi, he had two options, he could fight and see his city annihilated by the stronger army of Alexander who were well prepared for crossing Indus river or not oppose Alexander and save his city from death and destruction. Alexander was known to make examples of opposition leaders with slow painful and public deaths. King Ambhi wisely avoids confrontation and does not offer any kind of resistance to the Greek army. 6. Alexander crossed Indus river with ease and commandeered Taxila making it his base of operations for mounting further attacks east of river Hydaspes. After

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

How Great Was Alexander the Great? Alexander the Great was the son of Phillip II who was assassinated after conquering the Greeks. Alexander became king at the age of 20 and right away began to expand. He began by crushing a Greek revolt in Thebes and gained the respect from the rest of the Greeks not to rebel.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

“Finally, at the Indus River in western India, Alexander was stopped - not by an enemy, but by his own army, which refused to go further” (BGE). Also after they conquered a place that is now Pakistan, some people didn’t go back with Alexander (Doc F). When Alexander was pushing into India and his own army stopped him that situation shows that they didn’t have enough trust to follow him any further. Also after they took over the place that is now Pakistan some of his troops didn’t go back. This shows that they might not have had any more trust in Alexander, or they thought he was getting too

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander the Great, son of Phillip the second, was a mighty Macedonia king who came close to conquering the entire civilized world of his day. Shortly after succeeding the throne, Alexander began the dynastic purging of his enemies. Alexander was extremely ambitious and aspiring. Alexander died in 323 BC and his empire stretched from the western edge of modern-day India to Egypt! Alexander not only created a vast empire, but he also helped begin the flow of cultural diffusion throughout his conquered lands.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander was able to outsmart many empires through his excellent strategy. Each part of land had a planned out way to take control. He fought few wars and still conquer most of the middle

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander met his first fierce enemy at the Granicus River, he used tactics like Phalanx and siege warfare to win battles. He and his army travelled around 7000 miles from Macedonia to Egypt and to the Hynapses River in India. Alexander was a genius when it came to war tactics such as when he and his army needed to cross the Hydaspes River without losing many of his troops. So he devised a plan to go up and down the river making noise that sounded like he was preparing for an attack but wouldn’t, but when he finally did attack the enemy had left their guard down making it an easy victory. (Doc A)

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander became king of Corinthian League by eliminating his enemies. Alexander’s ego and reputation was very important to him. He inherited one of the largest empires by battling and over taking other kingdoms. He used his honorable position to launch a project his father had previously planned. The plan was called “Panhellenic project” and it was to lead the Greeks on a conquest to rule all of the land including Persia.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The conquests of Alexander the Great during the 4th century BC undoubtedly transformed the ancient world, bringing people of foreign lands into contact with Greek ideals and customs that spawned a unique Hellenistic period of both decaying and generative traditions. Despite the historical dramatization of Alexander, emphasizing his charisma and intellect as being the driving forces in creating an empire of a size that had never been imagined before, the contexts of cultural tension between Greek and Persian societies, a fractious Greek political state, and civil strife from an overpopulated Greek world greatly supplemented Alexander’s inherent traits in clearing a path for him to rise and embark on a path of conquest in the pursuit of eternal

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Literary Analysis: Hills Like White Elephants The “Hills Like White Elephants”, written by Ernest Hemingway, is a story about a couple who have a decision to make. Though it is never said anywhere throughout the story, the couple is faced with an unwanted pregnancy. The characters have a tough decision to make nd they have different opinions on what the right choice is.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

There are three main components of greatness. Being humble, having integrity, and caring for others. There are many figures throughout history that have displayed these such as George Washington, Rosa Parks, and Gandhi. Alexander the great was not great because although he conquered a lot of land he was very greedy and conceited. Alexander could not recognize when others attempted to help him.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about How Did King Alexander Conquer India

Related Topics

Open Document