ipl-logo

How Did Louisiana Purchase Contribute To Hamilton's Transfer Of Power

512 Words3 Pages

From the time the Constitution was adopted in 1789 to the Missouri Compromise in 1820 a shift in power occurred, this resulted in an expansion of the national governments authority over political and economic matters at the states expense. Hamilton’s economic policies, Marshall Supreme Court decisions, and the Louisiana Purchase were the fundamental factors that lead to this transfer of power. Though not without a fight from the Jefferson Democratic Republican party who supported a limited government and a strict construction, whereas the ultimate contributors to this exchange, the federalist, wanted to extend the powers of the government in order to create institutions that could strengthen the new country. However, despite opposition and pleas against these matters, the means and support behind the federal government proved to strong to prevent this sway and power. …show more content…

He promoted assumption of the states debt, which in turn, chained the states to the federal government and shifted the attachment of wealthy creditors. Though despite southern states protest, that it was unfair that some states received a free pass, since many of them had already paid their debt off, Hamilton’s plan was still approved. Hamilton went on to propose and create the Bank of the United Sates, The federal government ended up owning one-fifth of the bank, allowing them to control large sums of money, with little room for opposition on how and where it went. Despite Jefferson argument that there was no authorization in the constitution for such an economic octopus, Hamilton argued that the bank was not only necessary but also proper. This is turn evolved the theory of loose construction by invoking the elastic clause of the constitution- a model for enormous federal

Show More
Related
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

The Bank of the United States was a necessity that our nation could not do without because it created a national currency, created new money through borrowing, and expanded the national economy. The bank would be the capstone of Alexander Hamilton 's financial plan. His plan was for the states debts and federal debts all be assumed by the federal government under the impression that it would bring the states closer to the national government. The willingness of the American people to repay their debts drew the attention of foreign investors. While the first part of Hamilton 's financial plan was successful, many people were still opposed to the idea.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Hamilton's economic plan turning point was on the promotion of manufacturers and commerce. While Hamilton distrusted popular will and believed that the federal government should use considerable power in order to steer a successful course, Jefferson placed his trust in the people as governors (Holmes). Hamilton's plan was to establish a bank like the one in England to maintain public credit; strengthening the states' debts under the federal government, and enacting protective tariffs and governments subsidies to encourage American manufactures. All these measures strengthened the federal governments power at the expense of the states. Jefferson opposed these views from Hamilton he feared that the Bank of the United States represented too much English influence, and argued that the constitution did not give congress the power to establish a bank.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Prior to the events of Bleeding Kansas that begun in 1854, the United States followed a strict policy of compromise in regards to it’s political decisions. Being a relatively newly founded country a great deal of care was given towards pleasing the citizens of the United States, through compromise, in order to maintain a stable society. This is specifically evident in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850. These events helped to maintain the stability of American society for a time. However, as the nation developed further there became apparent divides on many matters, but mainly over slavery.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

The creation of the first bank in the United States prompted a political debate which started in 1791, and went on in the following years. Hamilton’s plan foresaw a bank provided with special powers and privileges, which gave birth to a wide opposition. Although Hamilton 's idea continues to exist in today’s economic environment, at that time his proposal was met with widespread resistance from individuals such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who considered the creation of a federal bank as unconstitutional. Following to a broad interpretation of the Constitution, Hamilton argued that in order to have an effective bank, Congress should be provided with all the powers required. Jefferson disagreed with Hamilton, and claimed that the establishment of such a bank was not consistent with the powers that the Constitution granted to Congress.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

He successfully argued for the assumption of state debts by the federal government and the establishment of the first national bank – a private, but partially government-owned institution. He firmly established the principles of financial trading. Due to his efforts, the creditworthiness of the United States was restored. Hamilton’s accomplishments as Treasury Secretary were not achieved without a struggle. His congressional opponents tried to exhaust him by demanding detailed reports on the workings of the treasury department with incredibly short delivery dates.

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

Hamilton 's monetary course of action for the nation included working up a national bank like that in England to keep up open credit; cementing the states ' commitments under the focal government; and initiating guarded tolls and government enrichments to empower American makes. These measures fortified the administration 's vitality to the hindrance of the states. Jefferson and his political accomplices limited these progressions. Francophile Jefferson expected that the Bank of the United States addressed an inordinate measure of English effect, and he battled that the Constitution did not give Congress the capacity to set up a bank. He didn 't assume that propelling produces was as basic as supporting the authoritatively settled agrarian base.

Read More
1561 Words | 7 Pages

Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a national bank to pool all of the country’s debt together. This would be beneficial because the bank would be able to collect taxes, create one currency, and make loans. This grew into a problem because a national bank was not mentioned in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson especially opposed the National Bank, and made a statement that declared “It [gave it] the sole exclusive right of banking under the National authority … [was] against the laws of monopoly … to [grant it] a power to make laws [superior] to laws of states … [is wrong]” (Document 2). It started to become controversial because many people interpreted the Constitution differently.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

If it would have been adopted, it would ensure that power rested on the people, and that they would never be at the mercies of the state and the federal government (Broadwater, 2012). However, the acute vision of Hamilton prevailed, making the American people not to have an access of the wide array of privileges they had widely anticipated. If the financial debt plan had worked, it would also limit unnecessary spending by the national government, and ensure that people had a say on the things that mattered mostly to them. The weak central government would act as an overseer of the states, and would not be domineering in their affairs as it has been since Hamilton’s death (Mattern, 2005). This would also ensure that the American people had an increased autonomy from the political class, and ensure that they are free to engage in their daily activities without interference by the various federal programs that were proposed and adopted courtesy of Hamilton.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

Hamilton wanted to create public credit with a treasury system, a national bank, a mint, and increase manufacturing which would help unify the country. On the other hand, there was Jefferson, who opposed a strong central government. He argued that the “wealthy would gain at the expense of ordinary Americans and that Hamilton’s political economy would corrupt the morality of citizens and undermine the social conditions essential to republican government”(Powerpoint). The country would opt for an approach closer to Hamilton’s views. One of the first acts was the National Banking Act.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of Treasury of the United States, had a lot going for himself being a man that came from poverty to success, and he was a man “all powerful and fails at nothing which he attempts” admitted a congressman in 1791 (Tindall and Shi). Born in the Caribbean in the West Indies, abandoned by his father and orphaned at the age of 13 by his late mother who had died. Later moved to New York, became a lawyer and transitioned to nationalism thus giving him the important role of handling the weight of the debt America had accumulated $54 million deep after the Revolutionary War (Digital History). Hamilton saw the need for some financial credit to be given to America and he had the right idea by proposing a National Bank to his first president George Washington. Word dispersed of that proposal leading a

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The main point of Thomas Jefferson’s argument is that the power of the United States to create a national bank is not stated in the Constitution. Because the power is not specifically enumerated, it is unconstitutional. The main point of Alexander Hamilton’s argument is that there are many things that the United States may not do, but creating a national bank is not specifically stated, making it constitutional. Hamilton is building his argument on the tenth section of the first article of the Constitution.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t allow something, it was forbidden. Hamilton and the Federalists were loose constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t forbid it, it was allowed. He explained his loose constructionist views in “Hamilton’s Opinion as to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States,” saying, “If the end is clearly found within any of the specific powers, and if the law has an obvious relation to the end, and it is not forbidden by any particular provision of the Constitution, it may safely be deemed to come within the compass of the national authority.” The National Bank held money for the nation, funded the government, and put private and public money together for a capital pool. Hamilton liked the National Bank because it loaned money to

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

In order to pay such debts back, Hamilton created the federal bank and convinced the Congress to issue federal bonds. This way the federal government could make interest payments on time, build credit while keeping the inflation from rising. Hamilton thought that the national debt could be a useful tool in order to create capital while letting the American industry to be highly competitive in foreign trade. In his book, Gordon also recalls that soon after the 1812 War the seventh President of the United States paid off the government debts thanks to surpluses deriving from high tariffs. Then, he explains that the introduction of the first Federal income tax in America during the Civil War proved to be decisive in order to investigate how to distribute the tax

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

Many believed that the adoption of the union had alleviated all problems surrounding independence but later realized that it was crumbling right before their eyes. Following the Declaration of Independence, Continental Congress became aware that it was a necessity to form a national government. During the discussion for a new government, many problems were encountered. One of the issues that was faced dealt with the question as to whether representation and voting would be would be portioned out or would it be done by each state. This caused some problems and delays for the constitution but after Philadelphia had been captured by Britain, this became a matter of urgency.

Read More

More about How Did Louisiana Purchase Contribute To Hamilton's Transfer Of Power

Related Topics

Open Document