More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of the first amendment of the bill of rights
Thomas jeffersons contribution to the constitution
1st amendment importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the 1790s, before their presidencies, the views of Jefferson and Madison differed from those of Hamilton. Hamilton, a Federalist, supported a strong central government that could enforce the law and uphold the Constitution. (Doc B) Before
Hamilton responded to this concern in the essays by saying the unity of the states were at risk of falling apart without a national government to hold everything together, and that by implementing a judicial branch and the Presidential veto, there was a series of checks and balances that would prevent the Congress from becoming too powerful. In addition, the members of the House of Representatives were elected by the people, which would prevent them from acting against the people’s best interests. By taking each section of the document separately the three writers were able to discuss benefits of the Constitution, like improving the economy, supporting a Navy and defense, and just generally what specific powers, and limits on powers, were given to the various branches of the newly proposed government. Hamilton also pointed out that if this new form of government turned out to have hiccups, it was not set in stone, and amendments could be proposed to modify and improve the
Hamilton says a government is weak without its people, and how American countries could easily be invaded due to poor security. In between Spanish territory and American by the Mississippi River. America was too weak to fight back that the Spanish took over the river and used it for trading. Alexander says those who disagree the new constitution do not want to see a sufficient government. He implies that we should have a more robust central government, and how the Constitution can provide that.
Hamilton wants a strong government and Jefferson wants a small government so the federal government would not take power. As for Jefferson he believes that agriculture should form the basis of the economy. But Hamilton wants something else then Jefferson because Hamilton a interpreted the Constitution broadly or loosely. Hamilton believes in different things then Jefferson because they both don’t like each other. Hamilton thinks other things because he believes that those plans will work.
The creation of the first bank in the United States prompted a political debate which started in 1791, and went on in the following years. Hamilton’s plan foresaw a bank provided with special powers and privileges, which gave birth to a wide opposition. Although Hamilton 's idea continues to exist in today’s economic environment, at that time his proposal was met with widespread resistance from individuals such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who considered the creation of a federal bank as unconstitutional. Following to a broad interpretation of the Constitution, Hamilton argued that in order to have an effective bank, Congress should be provided with all the powers required. Jefferson disagreed with Hamilton, and claimed that the establishment of such a bank was not consistent with the powers that the Constitution granted to Congress.
Hamilton interpreted it loosely while Jefferson was strict. This led to an argument about whether the creation of a national bank was constitutional; Hamilton stated it was while Jefferson claimed it wasn’t. Another issue that they clashed
Hamilton 's monetary course of action for the nation included working up a national bank like that in England to keep up open credit; cementing the states ' commitments under the focal government; and initiating guarded tolls and government enrichments to empower American makes. These measures fortified the administration 's vitality to the hindrance of the states. Jefferson and his political accomplices limited these progressions. Francophile Jefferson expected that the Bank of the United States addressed an inordinate measure of English effect, and he battled that the Constitution did not give Congress the capacity to set up a bank. He didn 't assume that propelling produces was as basic as supporting the authoritatively settled agrarian base.
Jefferson believed that people have the ability to govern themselves. He favored giving more power to the state government. However, Hamilton believed in an powerful central government which is in the hands of those few elite men, rich and intelligent men (Doc 2 & 3). Jefferson favored the common man, “the chosen people of God”, and wanted more power
It is evident that Hamilton and Madison stood out as great friends, and that they shared common things in as far as ideological concerns are concerned. They had worked together in the confederation congress in the early 1780s. However, the problem and differences began between the two in the year 1790, and this was guided by the state of the public debt. The famous report on public credit submitted by Hamilton was aimed at solving financial challenges in the states (Broadwater, 2012). The state of the debt seemed to be occasioned by the lack of organization and proper communication that would accompany it.
The need for a national bank was very much so necessary. Hamilton also convinced president Washington to sign the bank bill by his lengthy report that stated: “This criterion is the end, to which the measure relates as a mean. If the end be clearly comprehended withan any specified powers, collecting taxes and regulating the currency, and if the measure have an obvious relation to that end, and is not forbidden by any particular provision of the constitution, it may safely be deemed to come with the compass of national authority.”
The National Bank that Hamilton proposed would offer the United States, a newly blooming nation, some financial stability to not only the government, but also the colonists. The idea would be similar to Great Britain's National Bank, but would be about benefitting both the national government and the colonists in the long run. This idea would expand the wealth of the country, by offering help and giving loans to those who needed them. With that loaned money, the American’s would be able to increase the amount of money going into flowing into the U.S. economy and increase the United States wealth. Due to this bills undertones for strong national government, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison opposed the bill, they then blocked its passage into the House of Representatives.
These papers discussed how the new government would be beneficial to the American people. Alexander Hamilton wrote that “A government ought to contain in itself every power requisite to the full accomplishment of the objects committed to its care, and to the complete execution of the trusts for which it is responsible, free from every other control but a regard to the public good and to the sense of the people.” The government was there to do good for the American people and to complete the responsibilities that it has. People that were against the new Constitution argued that it created too strong a government but supporters of the new government argued that a stronger federal government would be a good thing and there were still things put into place that would prevent the government from gaining too much power. The papers argued that the government would have more power than it did before but it would positively impact the American people.
•“She was not even listening. She had gotten tired of listening. She knew, as we all knew, what the outcome would be. A white man had been killed during a robbery, and thought two of the robbers had been killed on the spot, one had been captured, and he, too, would have to die” (4). This quote is important because it allows me to understand that Jefferson has to die because he was the only person in the liquor store and was a black man.
The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective
Strong, long lasting unions are built from the determination and respect of the people; individualism takes a sole part in the United States government and has it has shaped our world today. When the United States of America was born, myriads of people migrated to this land in search of a better life- the only problem was how the country itself were to be run. People from across the world carrying different opinions, religions, memories, and backgrounds provided various outcomes for how the big picture for America would look. The people were attempting to form a government based off of their own human rights (and other aspects in balancing the federal government), but still looked for a form of structure to uphold this new form of free land.
