More handpicked essays just for you.
The comparison of martin luther king jr and malcolm x
Malcolm x and martin luther king philosphey comparrison
The comparison of martin luther king jr and malcolm x
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One was a leader while the other was neither a leader nor a follower. One was admired by many people while the other had a mystic aura around him. Martin Luther King Junior was a natural-born leader. He was an activist and spoke many speeches that captivated his followers. He had the inspirational bubble in him that gave hope throughout the country.
Malcolm X believed that blacks and whites should work separately, but have the same rights as one another. He also thought that blacks must achieve that through any means necessary. I believe that Martin Luther King had the better philosophy. He understood that violence wouldn’t fix everything, he was extremely determined, and he wanted the black and white communities to join together as one nation.
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
Like transcendentalists, Martin Luther King Jr. supported individualism, community, and innovation. However, he supported organized religion while transcendentalists advocated for people to have spirituality without having an organized religion.
Not only did they use different tactics one of them wanted a more beneficial impact for the African American community and employment crisis. Malcolm X shows that he wanted to have a different approach and impact on the problem when he stated, "That will enable us to create employment for the people of our community so they don't have to be constantly be involved with boycotting and picketing...." unlike MLK, Malcolm X didn't want to be a part of boycotting and picketing businesses instead he wanted African Americans to own businesses because they could obtain more money and hire more African Americans at their desirable amount. Martin Luther King, Jr's tactic for obtaining his goal was to boycott businesses and companies to influence white business owner to hire more African Americans shown by MLK stating, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott." by this statement MLK means the weapon that changes society is the boycott (which is the refusal of buying goods from a business, company, store, or etc.) compared to Malcolm X's tactic for obtaining his goals MLK had a whole new approach to the problem which they
The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. earned him to be recognized as the face of the Civil Rights movement. Therefore, Malcolm X should have changed his leadership style to work with Martin Luther King Jr. because his way of fighting for civil rights was strategically thought out and ultimately effective. Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights movement. He was born in Atlanta, Georgia to Reverend Martin Luther King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. Martin Luther King Jr. came from a line of pastors in his family, and from the beginning, he was on his way to becoming one himself (Martin Luther King Jr.).
During the 1960’s, Martin Luther King Jr. had the best philosophy compared to his counterpart, Malcolm X. They both have different methods of solving racism and having civil rights for black Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights peacefully and nonviolently. Malcolm X on the other hand, wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights by any means necessary.
DBQ: Martin Luther King and Malcolm X: Rewrite During the 1960’s there was a greatly increased in violence in America. There were riots, bombings, racism, and discrimination. Many African American were mistreated due to the racist people who intervened the African Americans from doing anything. Two civil rights activists wanted change for African Americans and were both fighting for the same cause, civil rights.
MLK’s approach to civil rights acts was non-violent , passive resistance, and “ weapons of love”. I feel like MLK is more successful for the civil rights movement, he was more of a peaceful leader. He was more careful at handling stuff, like weapons, and non-violence. Both of them are against violence. That's why they had
Martin Luther King Jr. was the leader of peaceful protests and nonviolence for the segregation among blacks and whites while Malcolm X wanted to gain justice through any possible way even if it required violence. The Montgomery Bus Boycott made King a more prominent leader
The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.
King believed in “peace, no violence, and unity between all” (www.biography.com). In contrast, Malcolm X was all for violence. Malcolm X was born into a Muslim household. He relied heavily on his faith and was extremely influential towards pushing others to join the Islamic community. During his journey Malcolm X even “grew the Islamic population in America from 4,000 to 40,000 members by 1960” (www.biography.com), proving his dedication to the Muslim faith.
His tone also rises in tone to emphasize calls to action and explanations of the problem. The difference between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. when it comes to religious and racial problems is that Malcolm X believes that the people need to rise up and take action, using violence if necessary. King Jr. however, believes in changing
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both two African American civil rights activists who were very prominent throughout history. They fought for what they believed in but in vastly different ways. Martin Luther King Jr. was born to a middle class family and was well educated. Malcolm X, on the other hand, grew up in a rather hostile environment with barely enough schooling. Both their speeches, “I Have a Dream” and “The Ballot or the Bullet” may have shared some common traits, but at the same time, differed greatly in various aspects.
