The statue of Cincinnatus is also for former President George Washington, since he too, was a farmer who lead troops through the Revolutionary War. People found many seminaries between the two men. This statue has evidence that people wanted others to know how successful Cincinnatus really was, because since this was a Roman leader and doesn’t really have a huge effect on Americans, people still wanted his statue in America. This shows that even though he didn’t directly effect Americans, people still wanted to recognize him as a “hero” in the Ancient Western Civilizations. He sacrificed his own personal time and needs to put them toward his country, and help them win the wars with neighboring enemies.
I honestly do admire the piece of artwork based on the quality of how it looks. For example, I like the attention to detail; the sword on the ground, the wound on the chest, and the facial expression all came together to make it a truly amazing composition. I agree with everything he has to say about it. For example, I can understand how he says the piece was made to commemorate Hellenistic wins from defeating the Gauls. I also like how he supported everything he talked about with some explanation.
Moreover, Cassius points out the unfairness in the world through a metaphor juxtaposing Caesar as a god while Cassius is merely “ a wretched creature that must bend his body.” Finally, he concludes the monologue with the disbelief that “such a feeble [man] should get the start of the majestic world / And bear the palm alone,” which highlights how an ordinary person, Caesar, should not wield absolute
Then, one of the last points he makes is presenting Caesar’s will. This shows the crowd what a monumental person Caesar was in that, even after his death, he wanted to give back to the people of Rome. The noble Antony reads out, “Moreover, he hath left you all his walks, his private arbors and new-planted orchards, on this side Tiber. He hath left them you, and to your heirs for ever — common pleasures,” (3.2.340-43). These precise instances of Caesar’s generous heart make the citizens wonder why such a respectable man was murdered.
These powerful uses of pathos is the final way Antony is able to turn the crowd’s feeling about Caesar into a positive feeling and finalize the crowd’s hatred for the
His story of Caesar’s death riles up the crowd, but not enough to satisfy his desire for chaos. Antony furthers the crowd's emotions by comparing the crowd’s current actions to what Brutus’s would be in the same
As the play progresses, Marc Antony’s manipulative nature is revealed and is especially evident in his shrewd use of rhetoric in Caesar’s eulogy. To bolster his underlying claim that Caesar’s murder was unwarranted and the conspirators should be held liable, he uses several rhetorical devices. Throughout his speech, Antony reiterates the caustic line, “Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.95-96). In doing so, he undermines Brutus’ character and disproves his allegation of Caesar’s ambition. Additionally, he poses several rhetorical questions regarding Caesar aimed at provoking thought and emotion in the crowd.
In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,
When the scene opens you see a crowded street in Rome, A little background on this Caesar, Murellus, Flavius, and Pompey were all ruling Rome together as tribunes. After a disagreement with Caesar and Pompey, Caesar took it into his own hands to defeat Pompey and as if that weren’t enough Caesar tracked down and killed Pompey’s family and followers. Which is where scene one begins. Upon his return from battle the streets are crowed with citizens celebrating his triumph. This begins with murellus and Flavius coming across a group of commoners in their Sunday best flaunting the streets on their way to applaud Caesar for his accomplishments, the two seem upset over this, telling the commoners they shouldn’t be out in the streets celebrating when
Anthony Everitt’s biographical novel Cicero tells the life and times of Cicero in an exemplary way through his knowledge, objective historical judgments, and organization of the text. It is evident in the detail of events that Everitt has a vast knowledge of Cicero’s life, but also of the socioeconomic, cultural, religious, and political culture of Rome. From the beginning of the novel, Everitt approaches the book with a historical perspective, seeking to show what Rome was like in the first century BC by establishing a proper context for Cicero’s political life. Not to mention, Everitt begins the biographical focus of the novel with the famous death of Julius Caesar on the steps of the Senate on the Ides of March, which is at the end of Cicero’s life. This choice to begin near the end of Cicero’s life may seem unusual, but this scene captivates the reader in terms of figurative language and shows what the political instability of Rome caused, that is, the death of Julius Caesar, who only came to power because
In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.
In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to
The play begins with Julius Caesar returning from a victory over Pompey to a cheering crowd of Romans. He is an ambitious leader who wants Rome to prosper and looks out for his countrymen over himself, though he has his own, darker, flaws. This selflessness is explicitly demonstrated by him saying “What touches us shall be last served” (III.I.9) when he is told to deal with a letter because it most directly related to him. His goal is to further Rome and gain the approval of his people, which he does very well.
Caesar’s scornful behavior towards the soothsayer illustrates his arrogance. Later, in Act 2, Calpurnia pleads Caesar to stay home because she realizes that all the omens are pointing to Caesar’s death. Despite her plea, Caesar insists “Caesar shall forth: the things that threaten’d me ne’er look’d but on my back; when they shall see the face of Caesar, they are vanished” (2.2.15-17). These incidents show that Caesar’s pride blinds his ability to see his tragic end. Moreover, Caesar ignores his own feeling of uneasiness towards Cassius for the sake of his pride.
The teaching profession naturally is context-based and full of uncertainty (Edward, et al, 2002; Murray, 1996) that a teacher has to entertain in a flexible and open-mind manner. That is why Larrivee (2006), Daloglu (2001) and Darling-Hamond (2006) claimed that it is almost impossible to manage all ‘learning engagements to teach’ at the time of training in the teacher education. Reflection, particularly critical reflection, helps learners to realize being experienced, innovator, participant observers, continuous experimenters, adapters, action researchers, problem solvers, clinical inquirers, self-evaluator, political craftsmen, etc. in such a way that it ensures continuous professionalism in teaching (Tom, 1985; Zeichner, 1983), which is useful
