ipl-logo

How Did Marx View History In Terms Of Class Struggle?

1047 Words5 Pages

Reading Question 1: Marx view history in terms of class struggle explain what this means and the various classes Marx refers to.
Class struggle means that throughout history the names of the different social classes had changed, but one constant remained (Rader, n.d.). The names of these social classes are the rich and the poor. During this time, if you were born poor you were going to die poor. Due to this, Marx stated that “history is a history of class struggle” (Rader, n.d.). He claimed the term “capital” which stemmed from Capitalism. During Capitalism, the class structure was oppressor and oppressed. The oppressors were known as Bourgeoisie and were capital owners. They owned some sort of property that allowed them to earn large amounts …show more content…

Some examples of this are: land, factories, or corporations. The two ways in which these resources can have common ownership are the government (businesses) and the worker owned (corporations). By the government, the resources can be shared among all citizens (Rader, n.d.). By worker owned, all employees earn a share of the business and a share of its profits (CITATION). It is so important to abolish this because Marx believed that Capitalism would end up being its own gravedigger. As workers rebel against the tyranny of capitalism, it will collapse. Marx called the transition stage from capitalism to pure communism, “socialism” (Rader, n.d.). Due to this, the worker’s rights movement was brought upon society. It secured decent pay, brought safe working conditions, and limited the hours that companies can force employees to work (Rader, n.d.). It is also important to abolish it so governments take strong measures to regulate business in many different ways. For example, income tax and the abolition of the right of inheritance and the right to own land (taxes and property tax) (Rader, n.d.). These are all things that Marx called for and that society has …show more content…

During Marx’s time, workers were paid very little. It could be as little as five cents per hour. However, in society today people work for at least minimum wage ($8.30) an hour. Working conditions during Marx’s time were not good and not safe. People could be crushed or seriously hurt on the job very easily. In society today, there are laws on the safety of a workplace. Employees are not to be able to get seriously hurt at work, this includes death. People in Marx’s time could be required to work all day and night with no break or time to sleep. This affected the people very poorly. Today, the maximum average working hours per week is forty-eight. During this time, people are required to have a break from work. In my opinion, I think Marx would recognize modern day America as capitalists. Even though the society of Western Europe could easily be described as socialist as well (Rader, n.d.). America has adapted the changes that Marx discussed. In fact, the government has taken strong measures in regulating some of these changes (Rader, n.d.).
Reading Question 4: Bernie Sanders is not a communist, but rather a democratic socialist. Listening to his speech what similarities did you see between the things Marx is talking about and calling for and what differences? What issue was he focusing on that

Show More
Related
1527 Words | 7 Pages

The economic conditions did not leave much job mobility or choice. The options were either work in horrible condition in a job that required practically no skill or go without necessities. There was no option outside of the factory. Because of this, workers were not only the “slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State” but they were “daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the onlooker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself” (16). According to the communist position, the worker was worse off because of the innovation and use of

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

The Unjust Beast Injustice can occur in varying forms, depending on circumstance. Lord of the Flies by William Golding explores this topic, when a group of school-aged boys get stranded on an island with no adult supervision. When the younger boys (littluns) start talking about a beast that attacks at night, it leads the older boys (bigguns) on a search through the jungle to hunt the beast down. Their pursuit to find the beast leads to the bigguns running into conflicts with both themselves and this supposed beast. Through the characters of Ralph and Jack, Golding suggests that self respect can lead an individual to making just or unjust decisions.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

According to Marx society was divided into two classes that were in eternal conflict in the battle for resources, or as Marx coined; “the means of production”. The first class were the bourgeoisie, which Marx described as the sole owners of the means of production as well as the media. The bourgeoisie used their power and influence to exploit the second class, which Marx called the proletariat which consisted of all the workers of the world. Marx rejected the idea that the wealthy pulled themselves from their own bootstraps, which he called “false consciousness” and in return coined the term “class consciousness”, which referred to a persons awareness of their own social status, especially in terms of class conflict. Overall, Marx concluded that social order is created maintained by domination and power.

Read More
1769 Words | 8 Pages

This book aims to evaluate all aspects of Marx's work and measures the value of it for sociological analysis and explanation. As Jordan believes one must understand the work if it is to mean anything in a contemporary society, he begins by explaining the origins of social class which is vital for anyone to understand before questioning its importance. The book is quite well structured beginning with basic assumptions of Karl Marx following his different theories. The chapter that studied social classes, class differentiation and class struggle was my main interest and although Jordan offered great explanation of Marx's writing I felt he could have offered more on just how meaningful it is for the world today. I will use the book as some of Jordan's explanations of Marx's writing are well thought and do emphasise why class was so important to Marx as he believed capitalism forced social stratification on to society which only benefited a minority.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Marx gathers seven criticisms towards capitalism and categorizes people as being either Bourgeoisie or Proletariat. The bourgeoisie are the rulers in a capitalist system, the corporate elite. The proletarians are the working-class people. In the first criticism, Marx points out the economic greed and inequality of a capitalist system, a system that possesses the resources to provide but won’t give because the owners of that system do not want to suffer profit losses. The second criticism states that the proletariat, the working-class are the reason the system have the necessary resources but are not given the privilege to own or afford the same, if any, luxuries the bourgeoisie own.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

He was able to witness firsthand horrible working conditions employers put their laborers through. They are basically treated like “mere machine” and their needs reduced to the “barest and most miserable level of sustenance.” ( Marx and Friedrich Pg.6). Marx also exposed theory of surplus, essentially explaining it as the idea where “The worker uses one part of the labour day to cover living expenses (wages), while the other part of the day the worker toils without remuneration, creating surplus value for the capitalist. This is the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class.”

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

He argues that with all the pressures of class conflict and the imbalance of capitalism there is no way that this pattern can continue without a major revolution. Marx compares capitalism to anarchy, in the sense that there is no organization within which only causes chaos. The common pattern of capitalism is a boom followed by a bust, and that bust leads to recession and social unrest. This sort of fickle economy, Marx believes, will furthermore contribute to the downfall of capitalism. This socialist revolution would, “abolish private ownership of key elements of economy and change nature of relationships from ones based on marriage and property.”

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

The people of the United States are ruled by one of the fairest government out of most of the other countries. There are laws meant to keep people safe and laws making sure everyone gets a good education. These laws are very good to have and important to have, but there are more and more laws and policies that are not helping the country very much. New technology has so many policies it is ridiculous and really difficult to create new technology. The government needs to find a balance or at least a more fair way for people to invent new technology and see if it would work.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

He felt previous revolutions, e.g. The revolution that swept Europe in 1848 had only substituted one tyrant for another. And as stated in the Communist Manifesto, “The modern bourgeois society has not done away with the struggle of classes, it has formed new classes and new struggles in place of old ones”. (Manifesto, 1848). Marx however felt a complete change was in order. He was in favour of having elections and votes for power, whereas the bourgeois only took power for themselves.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The proletariats are the wage earners or the labour class, in a capitalist society the proletarians don’t have much wealth, and their main asset is their labour power. The bourgeoisie is the class that owns the means of production, their class interest lies in the value of property and the preservation of capital, and this ensures their perpetual economic supremacy in society. According to Marx, in the capitalist mode of production, a worker slowly loses the power to decide upon his or her life and destiny, they lose their Gattungswesen (“species-essence”), and this is a consequence of living in a socially stratified society, where human beings become a mechanistic part of a social class. Even though human beings are self-conscious and autonomous, in a capitalist society they are nothing but an economic entity whose acts are dictated by the bourgeoisie, with the aim

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Marx believes that by having such two classes where one class exerts dominance over the other, it will lead to disastrous outcomes, where income

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

Capitalism, according to Karl Marx is divided into two major social classes: the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie, which is the minority of the class system, own the means of production such as land, machinery, factories and raw materials whereas the Proletariat, which is the majority of the class system, having no means of their own production and have to work to earn wage for a living. Karl Marx has his own theory that history is made up by class struggle which he mentioned in his book – Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1848) and had predicted that the Proletariat would lead a revolution to overthrow the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx believed that there will be intrinsic conflict like exploitation, alienation of labour and commodity fetishism between both of the classes.

Read More
2351 Words | 10 Pages

Karl Marx declared It is true that labour produces wonderful things for the rich, but for the worker it produces a privation. It produces palaces- but for the workers, hovels. It produces beauty- but for the workers, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws a section of the workers back to a barbarous type of labor, and it turns the other workers into machines Types of public service efficiency Investment Efficiency

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one

Read More

More about How Did Marx View History In Terms Of Class Struggle?

Related Topics

Open Document