How Did Regional Differences Affect Colonial America

Regional differences for centuries have affected the way people live and their views on varying issues all over the world. In the United States regional differences impacted the way people live and thought since the formation of the colonies. Their views varied on many issues like slavery, the ratification of the United States constitution and economic policy. Regional differences had a large impact on the development of the United States between the colonial period and the 19th century. Differing views based on where people lived had effect since the formation of the 13 colonies, most specifically on their view of slavery. The transatlantic slave trade was a time when millions of Africans were torn from their homes, deported to the American

When the papers were published they were published anonymously. This was done so that the writers would personal attacks. Thus, a person disagreeing with an anonymous tract could not attack it by saying that the author was corrupt. It made it more difficult to fight. The Federalist papers explained reasons why people should not fear a strong central government, specifically because of the separation of powers within each branch of government. Each branch of government has different powers. The legislative branch consists of Congress, which is made of two houses. The House of Representatives and the Senate both must pass a law for it to be enforced. The executive branch consists of the president, the president must then sign the law into effect and enforce it. The last branch is the judicial branch; this consists of the United States Supreme Court. They have power to ensure the law is constitutional. If it is not, the Supreme Court has the power to deem the law unconstitutional which causes it to be nullified. Within the Federalist papers one of their main focuses was explaining the power of checks and balances. Each branch of government had a power to keep the other from getting too powerful. In Federalist Paper No. 51 Madison writes, “If men were

He emphasized the importance of a national bank created by the Federal government because the United States had no way of paying back war debts from the Revolutionary War. The United States owed both foreign countries and citizens a great deal of war debt. A national bank would create a common currency that citizens could use. It would also establish a national credit so that other foreign nations would be willing to loan the United States money if they were ever in need of it. Thomas Jefferson opposed this plan. He thought states should charter banks that would then issue individual state money. Jefferson also believed that the Constitution did not give the national government the power to establish a bank under his strict interpretation of the constitution. Many Northerners supported Hamilton’s national bank because they felt the United States would become a manufacturer-based economy. Those who were in the South however, many of who were Democratic- Republicans, opposed the plan because they felt the future of the United States would continue to be based off of a farming economy. Jefferson and Madison, two of the founders of the Democratic- Republicans, do allow the establishment of the National Bank. This is actually a mystery as to how it happened since there was a secret dinner between Hamilton, Jefferson and Madison. In the Broadway