Downfall of the Rome Empire and Han Dynasty
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two of the most powerful entities to rule their respective parts of the world. At their peaks, both states controlled a large portion of the world population and produced political and cultural legacies. Although they were very powerful at their peak, they eventually had to come to an end. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire have similar and yet distinct downfalls: through the weakened leadership and military, depression of the economies and excessive spending.
Weak corrupt leaders were a major factor in the downfall of the Han Dynasty (189BCE- 220BCE) and Roman Empire (376AD- 461AD). The Han practice of concubinage led to much strife and even violence within the Forbidden City, causing disunity and internal conflict. Regents often attempted to seize power while the chaos was present. In contrast, love of money led to the precarious situations of Rome’s later emperors, as soldiers demanded gold for loyalty. In the long run, the Roman Empire became overwhelmed in debt as emperors tried desperately to buy the loyalty of the army, and the moral condition of its subjects continued to spiral downward. In both empires, corruption of government
…show more content…
Due to the amount of land they conquered, they had to face proportional invasions. The Han Empire’s greatest threats were the nomadic Hun people living in Siberia. During the second century BCE, expensive military campaigns were set place in order to control the Huns. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were involved, whereas, the tribes that attacked Rome, caused them to never have to unite, but their great numbers also made them easier to assimilate into the Empire. Through this we can see that both the empires had problems in their military and defending their land, but in different