ipl-logo

How Did Sweden Improve The Proportionality Of Its Electoral Results

1725 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Five Advantage And Disadvantage Of Proportional Representation

Sweden improved the proportionality of its electoral results by introducing the Saint-Laguë method instead of D’Hondt method. The highest average system awards seats by taking the vote totals for each party and dividing them by numbers to get a ranking. Both the Saint-Laguë and D’Hondt methods use the highest average system to award seats, but the Saint-Laguë method starts with a divisor of 1.4 and uses odd integers from 3 up (ESCE). The Saint-Laguë method yields results that are more proportional to the total votes. Sweden has a parliamentary system with multiple parties since the thresholds are not too high to discourage smaller parties from forming. The proportional electoral system has awarded seats to many different parties with current …show more content…

Voters in Sweden have a more difficult time holding the incumbent politicians accountable because the proportional system divides the government into various parties. This allows politicians to blame other parties for the failures of government. The mixed cabinet allows for the party in power to blame certain factions of the government without taking responsibility for possible failures. In this case, it is the job of the opposition to convince voters that the government is failing because of the current political party in power. It is easier to wield influence from being in opposition in Britain because the government is generally controlled by a single …show more content…

A democratic government allows for all people to be a part of the decision-making process, which means that both the majority and minority are fairly represented in government (What is Democracy). Britain allows for a majority to take full control of the government, giving less power to the opposition and other parties in the minority. Although it is easier to hold this type of government responsible in the next election, giving full power to a political party based on plurality isn’t as democratic as a proportional

Show More
Related
289 Words | 2 Pages

The three forms are: Wasted Vote, Excess vote, and Stacked vote. Wasted vote is the opposition supporters spreading across many districts as a minority. Excess vote is when the opposition supporters concentrate into

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

What does resilience really mean to you? The literal definition to resilience is the ability to cope with problems and setbacks. In the story Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand, she shows us all different kind of ways that the characters in her story used the skills that Kendra Cherry was talking about, to help them out of every situation. In this story it shows how certain situations affect people in different ways and how each person goes through seven skills. The characteristic that Louie undergoes is the skill of Strong Problem-Solving.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The electoral votes are broken down by the winner-take-all system rule which means candidates will necessarily focus on winning states where the polls show that there appears to be a close contest. What decides proportional representation? Proportional representation is decided by each state, which

Read More
1213 Words | 5 Pages

The system that Canada currently uses puts areas in groups called ridings, this leaves them vulnerable to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering causes there to be disproportionate representation because the boundaries of the electoral districts are manipulated to give one party an advantage over the other. Another method in which the first past the post system is manipulated in is the spoiler effect (Advantages and Dis…). The spoiler effect happens when people begin voting for a third party in hopes of changing the two-party system, this then causes the third party to take a percentage of votes from one of the main parties, often the one with similar ideas as the third party. This means that the party least like the third party will keep most of its votes and inevitably win.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.

Read More
1135 Words | 5 Pages

This data demonstrates the low chances of a third party candidate being able to gain any electoral votes. The system clearly disproportionately gives out electoral votes, making it especially difficult for third party candidates to win any elections. Additionally, in the 2000 presidential election, a third party candidate, Nader, went up against Gore and G.W. Bush. While Gore obtains 266 electoral votes, Bush receives 271, automatically making him the winner. On the other hand, the third party candidate, Nader, received a total of zero electoral votes, even though he gained 2,882,955 popular votes.

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Contrasting are those that promote the electoral college, expressing that it unites parties and makes them more moderate, it enforces a two party system, and it gives more voice to minorities. It can be agreed by most that the electoral college has its faults and improvement is possible. The means by which this could be achieved is not through

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

If there was three parties, and one of the parties won the election by a slight ⅓ vote, it would not be a majority of the people. Therefore the country would turn from a democratic republic to a whole different, less inviting arrangement. For example, In Australia, they are run by a Multi-Party system. The Australian Labor Party won with 35% of the popular vote. In Two-Party systems, it needs to be 51%.

Read More
3378 Words | 14 Pages

These issues were present in the 2010 election in Australia that used ranked-choice voting: “[t]he liberal Labor Party won the Australian House

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Germans usually cast two votes: one for a candidate in their constituency and one for a political party. The process is called a personalized proportional representation system. Simply put, Germans vote to decide how the 598 base seats in the Bundestag will be divided among members of Germany 's various political parties.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Although, at the time the belief in the Catholic church was that self interest was both shameful and a sin, Bernard Mandeville and Adam Smith shared the belief that private vices are what became public benefits. They believed that self interest is what made society flourish. Mandeville believed that whatever an individual did, whether it was a “virtuous” action or greed, self interest was at the core of the action. An individuals act of self interest are what kept industry and the economy thriving. Mandeville believed that “a desire to create a purely virtuous society is based on a vain Utopia seated in the brain” this view can be seen in his writing “Fable of the Bees”.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

This can arguably be more democratic that the Proportional representation system where the political parties picks the candidates, instead of the voters. In addition, the voting system make it easier to count the votes so the turnaround on the results is in hours rather than days. As matter of fact, the fastest count time was in Sunderland where it took those only 42min to address who won the election. Furthermore, in the election 2010, only 0.28% of the votes were spoilt which again shows the advantages of this system.

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

After exiting, they and their supporters tend to choose a candidate who has the similar ideology or one they simply dislike. It will gradually become the two-party system. The power has been held by either two largest parties. The candidate with the largest number of seats becomes Prime Minister, while the second largest become official opposition. Voting is a widely used method for making a decision.

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

First of all, it is important to know the definition of democracy and its aspects. According to Peter Joyce (2005), the democratic government was initiated in the Greek city state of Athens in the fifth century B.C., so as a consequence, the word ‘democracy’ derived from two Greek words, demos (meaning ‘people’) and kratos (meaning ‘power’) , which means ‘government by the people’. Secondly, Giovanni Sartori (1997), a Political Science Researcher states that ‘democracy’ is an abbreviation that means Liberal Democracy. He distinguishes three aspects: democracy as a principle of legitimacy (power not derives

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The political party model then spread over many parts of Western Europe, including France and Germany, over the 19th century. Since then, they have become the most common political system in the world. In this essay, we will show how political parties are essential to ensuring democracy. We will also show that there are unavoidable negative consequences to the party system. One of the fundamental tenants of democracy is the

Read More

More about How Did Sweden Improve The Proportionality Of Its Electoral Results

Related Topics

Open Document