ipl-logo

How Did The Australia Case Of Miller Influence The Application Of Jegee

421 Words2 Pages

Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient …show more content…

Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism,

Show More
Related
157 Words | 1 Pages

In Commonwealth v. Newman, 429 PA. 441 (1968), on November 16, 1964, at about 11:30 a.m. four detectives went to appellant 's home with a body warrant for appellant and a search warrant for the premises. The complaint for the search warrant recited that the affiant, Detective John McCrory, deposed that there was probable cause to believe that certain books, papers, and other items used for the purpose of a lottery were in the possession of Henderson Newman at or near 721 West Mary Street. They forcefully entered the appellant 's home without announcement or purpose. The court held that, the forcible entry without announcement of purpose violates the Fourth Amendment. The fruits of an illegal search are inadmissible under Mapp v. Ohio,

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

This court case focused on the Commerce Clause in Article

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

The attorneys failed to proffer any evidence in support of Solomon’s legal business enterprise, which he established with legal proceeds from the medical malpractice lawsuit. Furthermore, the attorneys never proffered any evidence on his behalf, which proved ownership, control, actual or constructive, or possession of the vehicles stopped by police. According to residents and property records, neither Johnson brother owned, occupied, possessed or control a property located at Oso. The property allegedly had $1,868,759 in cash and although such a very odd number, aside from questioning the veracity of the cash receipts, the indictment states that Mr. Solomon Johnson owned the vehicles, property, and currency.

Read More
1379 Words | 6 Pages

I Introduction In McCloy v New South Wales, the High Court upheld the validity of provisions in the Electoral Funding, Expenditure and Disclosures Act 1981 (NSW) that imposes caps on political donations, prohibits donations from property developers and restricts indirect campaign contributions in New South Wales. The majority did so on the grounds that whilst each of the provisions burdened the implied freedom of political communication, they had been enacted for legitimate purposes and hence, did not impermissibly infringe upon the implications within the Commonwealth Constitution.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

EC Knight Co., the sugar refining industry was monopolized by a handful of companies. When the American Sugar Refining Company completed a business agreement with a collection of other refineries, the company gained complete control over the industry. As a result, the United States government sued the sugar trust under the standing that the business agreement was in violation of the Sherman Act. The sugar companies held the opinion that they weren’t in violation because the agreement was made under the purpose of manufacturing that is in state control, opposed to federally controlled commerce. Chief Justice Fuller and the court decided in favor of the appellee, or E.C. Knight Co. under the idea that the Sherman Act wasn’t intended to limit manufacturing.

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

An Centerville man in connection with the fatal shooting that took place last night at the Fandago Bar & Grill last night was captured and is now in custody. Frederick Johnson, 32, was identified by the detectives as the shooter of the crime. Police had tracked him down at his apartment on Barboza Street just a few blocks from the bar but was not there until earlier this morning. “Johnson confessed to the detectives that he was selling cocaine to the victim, Peter Wickham, press secretary for the mayor, but claims that the shooting was an accident,” said Lt. Jane Orthlieb of the CenterVilled Police department. Johnson and Wickham were arguing over the money but began to get into a shoving match.

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

This memorandum is written in response to your September 1, 2015 request for information regarding the case of Samuel V. Morgan. The analysis will show that Samuel is liable to pay the fine. Robert is a senior weight lifter and member of the Alpha Chapter, Beta Phi Gamma Fraternity, Inc. at Howard University. Although he is strong, he is extremely slow moving which forces him to limit himself to fighting with people who are considerably smaller than he.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

The United States Supreme Court played significant role in deciding cases regarding property rights. Originally there were many misunderstandings between companies and individuals, corporate and private interests, Native Americans and U.S. laws. These misunderstandings created tensions between different parties and had to be resolved by the Supreme Court. There are many cases that deal with contracts, due process clause, or takings clause and different interests that were at stake; the four cases to review in detail are Johnson v. McIntosh (1823), University of North Carolina v. Foy (1805), Taylor v porter and Ford (1843), and Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren Bridge (1837). Johnson v. McIntosh (21 U.S. 543

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

“Shipp”). He was taken outside to the chants of the rest of the mob and was then marched to the Tennessee River, where he was thrown in (Pfeifer, “Historic”; “Shipp”). After waiting a couple minutes, Johnson was pulled up (Pfeifer, “Historic”). There were signs of life from Johnson, so the mob shot him (Pfeifer, “Historic”). His last words were: “God bless you all.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

1.0 Introduction Section 80 guarantees the right to trial by jury. The Queensland Jury Act 1995 provides the current legislation which decrees that all trials on indictment must be by jury. In the ninety years since this legislation was passed, an increase of trial complexity has occurred, leaving many jurors with the inability to comprehend the information and evidence procured in a trial. This proceeds to make lay juries ineffective and unreliable. To remedy the situation, specialised juries should be introduced to minimize the amount of incorrect verdicts, misunderstandings in court, jury misconduct, and avoidance of jury duty.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

I, Sydney Fikse, of sound mind delegate my sister, Carlie Fikse, as my agent if I enter a state where I am unable to make decision for myself. If my agent is unwilling or unable to serve as my agent, I appoint Whitney Johnson. I trust these two to make decision regarding my health and safety. I giver her permission to consent to or refuse any medical, surgical, or hospital health care I may need. This power of attorney is applicable is the case that I am unable to speak or soundly make decisions for myself.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

“As a result, the sentences imposed by judges within the same jurisdiction will not

Read More

More about How Did The Australia Case Of Miller Influence The Application Of Jegee

Related Topics

Open Document