Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient …show more content…
Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism, of Jogee. Both jurisdictions provided sufficient justification as to why they would not follow the Supreme Court’s decision. Evidently, joint enterprise in both Australia and Hong Kong did not pose a problem as it did in the UK, where it was appropriate for the significant change. Regardless, hopefully their decisions will not influence the application of Jogee in the UK to subsequent cases.Overall, the Chan Kam Shing judgement, which followed the Australia case of Miller is more far-reaching in its outlook offering apposite criticism,