How Did Thomas Paine Contribute To The French Revolution

816 Words4 Pages

For many years, historians reflected on such that has pondered us all, what started the revolution? The kickoff of the revolution varies between economics, and politics, even though some may believe it is undecidable. The colonists endeavored independance with a bit of work along the way, defeating the kings way of ruling and making it better for themselves. Although the prohibition of trade between other countries by the the king contributed to the feelings of melancholy and anger to the colonists, possibly starting the revolution, it was strongly precipitated due to the conflict of politics between the king and the colonists. The Declaration of Independence provides adequate evidence to prove that the Revolutionary War was motivated …show more content…

This is a political conflict that has been composed on all of the colonists and confusion, hate, and anger started to broil. This is especially shown in the document when it states “She protected us from those who had no quarrel with us on any other account, and who will now always be our enemies on the same account----because of her!” This proves that England protected the colonies from countries they had no setback with whatsoever, and now the countries became upset because of the protection. This shows that England worsened the relationships between them and other colonies/countries.Which affects the colonists politically because they no longer had a source of trade between other countries, which unfolds to the king taking their rights away. In addition, “A government of our own is our natural right: and when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human life, he will become convinced that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a deliberate manner.” This example presents that the government is the colonists’ right as well, because it is what they are being ruled by. When one thinks about life’s rollercoaster, it is believed that it is smarter and safer to have a formal constitution.This shows that the colonists should have a voice in their government, even though the king’s ideas are