ipl-logo

How Did Truman Make Wrong Decisions

602 Words3 Pages

Did you know that 105,000 Japanese lifes were taken on August 6th 1945 after the US dropped the atomic bomb. In 1945 the US had a big decision to make. They have been working on an Nuclear bomb since 1939. In 1945 it was ready to be dropped. President Truman made a big decison to drop it on Japan to try to wrap up and end the war. The question everyone is asking is, did Truman make the right decision? I think President Truman made the wrong decision. He chose to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. The three considerations that lead to this judgment were: A lot of innocent souls died, Japan was going to back out of the war anyway, and dropping the bomb cost Japan a lot of money to fix.

Truman's decision to bomb Japan was wrong because he killed a bunch of innocent lifes. One peice of evidence that shows Truman made a poor decision is, "The immediate deaths caused by atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was 66,000" A second piece of evidence that shows Truman made the wrong decision is, "A mother and her baby were lying with skin completely peeled off." The decision that Truman made for dropping the atomic bomb is weak because he killed so many lifes. He dropped the atomic bomb not …show more content…

One piece of evidence that shows Truman made the wrong decision is "Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped," A second piece of evidence that shows Truman made the wrong decision is, " the prime minister, the foreign minister and the navy minister had decided as early as May of 1945 that the war should be ended even if it meant acceptance of defeat on allied terms…." Truman's main argument and reasoning for dropping the bomb was he wanted to wrap up the war and just end it. But if all of Japan's head people came together and all agreed and decided that they were all going to surrender. Then dropping the bomb was uncessary and US could have avoided it all

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Was President Truman justified when he authorized the use of Atomic weapons against Japan? President Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the atomic bomb against Japan. The Japanese were close to surrendering, it was revenge for Pearl Harbor, and it was morally wrong to kill civilians. The first reason is that Japan was close to surrendering. According to Admiral

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

Justification of the Atomic Bomb Did Truman have enough justified reasons in dropping the Atomic bomb to end the war? On April 12 President Roosevelt died, vice president Truman had to take office and was suddenly forced to gain total victory over Japan. He had two options, the first one was to invade Japan with the planned Operation Downfall, he found out about his second option 12 days after he became president, after this weapon was explained in detail Truman immediately began to see the diplomatic implications of the bomb. To end the war the Atomic Bomb over Japan was totally necessary. “In conclusion, I would like to explain why Japanese soldiers do not surrender.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Some think Harry S. Truman was a good President for making a big decision in World War 2. Others say that he shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. He was a very interesting President during his time in office. Truman also made a lot of decisions during the war and many more when he was President. He has also proved to be an effective President.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

While this may be true of a president’s duties to their country, morally, Truman still should have weighed the potential damage the bombs would cause on a global scale. Knowing that the United States, a dominant nation, could conquer the Japanese with ease, he should not have used a weapon of mass destruction on the innocent citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The defense used this repeatedly to support their claims and offered no variation to their rationalizations of Truman’s actions. I feel that in this case, the defense team did little to truly justify the dropping of the atomic bombs. In essence, the ineffectiveness of their argument and their hackneyed statements used to explain the president’s actions did not provide enough evidence to clear his name and wash his hands of

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Looking at the statistics and charts during the war, the Unites States was already winning the war and the body count and death rate was way lower than the japanese where. If the U.S army stuck to the Island hopping campaign or operation downfall than the war would've still been won by the U.S. History would've turned out way different if the president did not give the order to fire the bomb. Maybe we could of had more allies. President Truman was not justified because of the way that he didn’t really have a plan,There were so many other operations and plans that could've works only if they tried or thought more clearly.(option #1: Invade Japan (operation downfall) President truman could have took many different paths instead of dropping the bomb and ending the war and frightening the Russians.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

World War I changed the course of battle with the breakthrough of newly developed machines of war that not only altered the course of the war but how the future would be fought. The most revolutionary technological advancement that was developed during the war was the immensely armored and nearly indestructible tank. The tank became a significant factor which allowed various competitors to destroy each other at a rapid pace with its highly engineered skeletal structure and its ability to increase the armies mobility across the Western Front. The tank underwent continual improvement, and various models were developed such as, ‘Little Willie’ and ‘Big Willie’.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

One reason, they argue atomic bomb should not have been used is, of the many people that were killed by the bomb, many were Japanese women, children and elder. They were innocent people, who were not involved in the war. Another reason experts disagree with Truman is it is said that Japan was ready to surrender. They believe Japan was "on their knees" and the bomb was unnecessary. (ushistory.org) Experts say the bombing was racist.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Much consideration and thought had to go into this decision. World War II had been going on for four years. Many casualties on both sides occurred. Many factors led to the dropping of the bomb including Pearl Harbor, it ended the war quickly which would save more lives, and the Japanese weren’t going to stop fighting. President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs was the right thing to do because it happened for the better.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Truman was the president of the United States at the time, so its obvious why he choose to drop the bomb. It would save more American lives this way. “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and did not use it and let a million more people die” (Doc L). If he didn’t drop it, about 400,000 to 800,000 American lives would have been lost (OI). If Japan couldn’t make war, there wouldn’t be war.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

Harry Truman, the president of the United States decision to drop an atomic bomb on Japan was wrong. The two bombing incidents, occurring on August 6 and 9, 1945, at Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed over 200,000 Japanese people, and many who were innocent. Many famous scientists, living in the United States of America, ultimately, did not agree with Truman's decision to drop the bomb. Famous scientist, Albert Einstein, was part of the Manhattan Project, which was the idea of developing the atomic bomb, to later use on Japan to end World War 2 in 1945.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

However, the Japanese were committed to fight to the bitter end of the war and see it all the way through, regardless of the fact that the United States demanded unconditional surrender from the small country of islands. This further emphasizes that since the Japanese were not simply going to give up, Truman came to the conclusion that in order to save millions of lives, he had to take thousands. President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Japan to warn the world about the new found power of the United States, force an unconditional surrender of the Japanese, and save millions of lives. With the controversy over whether or not Truman should have dropped the bomb, some consider the decision irrational and unnecessary.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More

More about How Did Truman Make Wrong Decisions

Related Topics

Open Document