How Does Arthur Miller Present Injustice In The Crucible

From working in a warehouse to becoming a famous, influential American playwright, Arthur Miller has been known for his astonishing plays, including The Crucible, published in 1953. Furthermore, his inspirations for this particular play come from his experience of being improperly convicted as a communist in the American society of the 1950s. Indeed, The Crucible reveals the intensity and perplexity that innocent people experience against the biased and arbitrary decisions from authority. Notably, Arthur Miller reflects his personal point of view regarding injustice based on John Proctor, Judge Danforth and Reverend Parris, who precisely engage an active debate in their distinct points of view and motivations based on saving the innocent people,

To illustrate, Proctor shows how the desperation of achieving his goal provokes him to make personal confessions, including the inappropriate affair with one of the people in the witch trials, Abigail Williams. However, Judge Danforth rejects his shocking confession and leads Proctor to answer, “I have made a bell of my honor! I have rung the doom of my good name—you will believe me, Mr. Danforth! My wife is innocent, except she knew a whore when she saw one!” (3.874-877). Doubtlessly, he is concerned about the injustice against not accepting his valuable confession, which can be related to the inopportune conviction of Arthur Miller. Similarly, they both have a viewpoint of court as spurious and fraudulent. In The Crucible, Miller not only shows the point of view of the innocent people, but of the people in power, including Judge

For example, the provocative dialogue during the witch trials creates controversy among the town of Salem based on his strict statements such as, “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it” (3.345-347). Considering this, Arthur Miller shows how ultimate control of the paramount decisions of the incriminated people makes Danforth have a stern viewpoint of maintaining order instead of bequeathing proper justice. Moreover, innocent people who are accused of witchcraft must follow the inconsiderate consequences, “The law, based upon the Bible, and the Bible, written by Almighty God, forbid the practice of witchcraft, and describe death as the penalty thereof” (3.611-614). Under those circumstances, Miller shows how the decisions of the witch trials are mostly influenced not only by Danforth, but their legitimate successors, including Reverend Parris.

Speaking about this, Arthur Miller reflects his point of view regarding injustice based on the desperate attitude of Reverend Parris in motivation to protect himself in court. Alternatively, Parris decides to intervene against the people who are trying to discredit the court in order to become the right hand of Danforth throughout the witch