ipl-logo

How Does Cesar Chavez Justify The Civil Rights Movement

632 Words3 Pages

Commemorating the ten-year anniversary of the assassination of civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, Cesar Chavez addressed a religious organization through an article he published within their magazine. A peaceful protestor of civil rights, Chavez justifies his organization’s actions by contrasting nonviolent protest tactics with violent ones as well as providing the differing effects of each. Cesar Chavez attempts to gain the respect of this helpful organization, so its members will identify with his movement. Desperate to obtain the approval of this organization, Chavez defines nonviolent protesting and believes it naturally gains the respect of outsiders. Admittedly, Cesar Chavez declares his preference for nonviolence, “Nonviolence …show more content…

To predict the outcomes, Chavez declares what would happen if his group resorted to violence, “Either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers.” Chavez paints the explicit picture of these results to contrast with those of his movement. Correspondingly, Chavez portrays his organization as a plausible alternative to retaliate against injustices. Cesar Chavez assures the religious readers of his article that his actions are justifiable, and that supporting his movement would be a judicious decision on their behalf. To put it differently, Chavez interprets the consequence of violence within an activist campaign, “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached.” Assuming his establishment would achieve their objective, Chavez discloses that it would be intertwined with devastations. Comparatively, Chavez proposes that his behavior is undoubtedly modest when compared to such extremes. Cesar Chavez satisfies his audience with his civil rights movement by inferring its justness. Conspicuously, Chavez imposes a grotesque ending, “Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” Apprehensive of his audience’s compulsion towards helping those in need, Cesar Chavez illustrates the

Show More
Related

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez

265 Words | 2 Pages

Cesar Chavez persuades his farm workers that nonviolence is as powerful as violence. He says that people should try to eliminate the amount of violence we use. Chavez does this in a unique way across his article by using personification, irony, and oxymoron to persuade the farm workers. Cesar Chavez uses personification throughout the article to help create characteristics to non living objects.

Read More

How Did Cesar Chavez Contribute To The Labor Rights Movement

2039 Words | 9 Pages

To emphasize, Cesar Chavez encouraged the use of non-violence throughout his entire career as a labor rights movement leader and civil rights activist. As this strike “...from Delano to Sacramento…” progressed, they gathered “...support from outside the Central Valley, from other unions, church activists, students, Latinos and other minorities, and civil rights groups,” (Kim, 5-6). Despite the growing support gained by this movement, a few years into the strike, from 1967 to 1968, many strikers had become impatient and considered using violence. However, Cesar Chavez “...believed nonviolence is more powerful than violence…,” (Kim,

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez

786 Words | 4 Pages

When the world is engulfed in injustice, it calls for brave men and women to fight back, but the question is how should one fight? Most would resort to violence to kill off injustice, but this leads to even more violence and chaos in most cases than intended. If someone is going to be shot the first reaction is to fight off the killer. However, Cesar Chavez implies in his powerful essay the weakness of violence in a unjust situation and instead the power of nonviolence.

Read More

How Did Cesar Chavez Contribute To The Chicano Movement

975 Words | 4 Pages

It is explained in “The Story of Cesar Chavez” that “Church demanded that the farm workers pay millions of dollars in damages resulting from a UFW boycott of its lettuce during the 1980’s. Rather than bring the legal action in a state where the boycott actually took place, such as California or New York, Church “shopped around” for a friendly court in conservative, agribusiness-dominated Arizona where there had been no boycott activity” (UFW). This is one instance that shows that the people and businesses against the movement were only literally looking to bring these activists down in whatever way they could, so at times for Chavez to keep doing his work without violence he had to give up a lot to continue this peaceful approach in efforts to gain what he was trying to gain. Regardless, Chavez continued to keep this approach, even going as far as fasting many times to prove he could accomplish something in peace. Although at times Chavez had to sacrifice a lot throughout his life for his work and people, he continued to remain true to what he believed in and fought for all the way up until his death regardless of what he had to

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Civil Rights Movement By Cesar Chavez

729 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez appeals to the people through the use of ethos in order to grab the audience's attention as to why non-violence is the way people should live. He believes that violence does not have a positive effect in human lives. Chavez appeals to ethos because ethos makes the

Read More

Juxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech

662 Words | 3 Pages

The civil rights movement was a strong topic of discussion in politics during the mid-twentieth century. Martin Luther King Jr., one of the most influential leaders of the civil rights movement, was assassinated which caused many protests and calls for violence. In Cesar Chavez’s speech, he is telling the people that nonviolence resistance is the best way to go about the situation. Chavez’s uses juxtaposition, diction, and rhetorical appeals to strongly convey his argument about nonviolent resistance. To begin with, Chavez uses juxtaposition to contrast the effects of violent and nonviolent resistance.

Read More

Cesar Chavez Speech Rhetorical Analysis

1036 Words | 5 Pages

In paragraph 4, Chavez describes a possible outcome of violent protests as a “total demoralization of the workers,” but in paragraph 12, he states that only the poor, the workers “get killed in the case of a violent revolution.” This shift in diction is able to convince his audience that violence has repercussion greater than they can fathom. Even though Chavez tries to sympathize with his audience that “we are not blind to feelings of frustration” he makes it clear that there must be a balance between peaceful and violent protests ,and that we also must have the strength to be patient in times of anguish. The line, “Those who espouse violence exploit people”(Paragraph 12), serves the intention of bashing

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez's Article

636 Words | 3 Pages

To achieve this, Chavez connects and sympathizes with his audience: “We advocate militant nonviolence as our means of achieving justice for our people, but we are not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.” This line evokes feelings of justice because it convinces people to advocate for the causes they feel passionately about. He also uses adjectives like frustration, impatience, seethe, and anger to drive their motivations. Chavez also uses an admonishing manner to convince his readers: “Our conviction is that human life is a very special possession given by God to man and that no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause, however just it may be.” This line allows the reader to be inspired and rally for the civil cause.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By Cesar Chavez

680 Words | 3 Pages

On the tenth year anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights activists, published an article about violence and nonviolence. The speaker in this article, Cesar Chavez, addresses the citizens of every country. The purpose for Chavez to write this is to show the reader how nonviolence and violence can lead to many different outcomes. The subject of this piece is civil rights. Throughout his article Chavez develops his argument of nonviolent protests by using logos, allusions, and tone.

Read More

Cesar Chavez Research Paper

1309 Words | 6 Pages

Cesar Chavez History Day Project One Mexican American farm worker dedicated his days to better the lives of his people, his name was Cesar Chavez. Horrendous treatment of farmworkers caused Chavez to take a stand for what he believed in, for no one should be treated poorly because of race or social class. During Chavez’s life, he organized peaceful protests, boycotts, as well as participated in a historic 36 day "Fast for life". Chavez not only changed the working rights for farm workers but subsequently gave dignity to the working class of America. The legacy that Cesar Chavez left behind was that he became the most important leader of the Latino people in the United States, and he founded the still standing United Farmworkers of America.

Read More

Cesar Chavez's Ethos Pathos Logos

483 Words | 2 Pages

The entire article is empowering and inspirational. A call to action by the author for people who have been suffering from injustice. He acknowledges that people turn to violence “when the deep concern they have for the people is frustrated” and how “the burden of generations of poverty and powerlessness lies heavy in the fields of America” (Chavez, 42-44, 48-50). These quotes can lead the reader to empathize with those who are struggling and allow them to recognize that although violence is an easy way out of confronting issues, the more “honorable” and liberating thing to do is participate in non-violent protests. This is exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. did.

Read More

How Did Cesar Chavez Impact Society

1074 Words | 5 Pages

Chavez did more than just change the lives of underpaid, and overworked farm workers. “For more than three decades Cesar led the first successful farm worker’s union in American history, achieving dignity, respect, fair wages, medical coverage, pension benefits, and humane living conditions, as well as countless other rights and protections for hundreds of thousands of farm workers” (“Cesar E.”). His strong effort reinvented the lives of everyone all around the United States, he helped farm workers understand that their work and ability is worth more. He also helped employers and the people who buy the crops appreciate the hard work these farmers put into their food every day. Acquaintances of Cesar helped him organize a plan or way for farm workers to grasp their rights.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Non Violence By Chavez

701 Words | 3 Pages

Comparing these reveals that with violence, even when it succeeds, it only replaces an oppressive, violent force with another one. To accomplish revolution, non-violence holds the most leverage and gathers the most people. Concluding, Chavez successfully downplays violence as a viable option for resistance to oppression by rhetorically convincing his audience

Read More

Cesar Chavez Nonviolent Resistance Analysis

651 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez, labor union organizer and civil rights leader, took the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as an opportunity to remind people about the benefits of nonviolent resistance. Chavez published an article in the magazine of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need. In this article, Chavez shares his views on how nonviolent resistance is more effective than violent resistance. Chavez contracts the outcomes of violence versus nonviolence using an if then format in order to prove nonviolence superior.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis On Cesar Chavez

530 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar attempts to share his thoughts with the masses in order to spread his solution to violence. He evokes strong emotions such as sadness, and guilt within his audience, along with posing logical questions that really make the audience think and listen to what he is saying. It is essential that Chavez's audience knows nonviolence has a more profound, lasting effect on society that paves the road ahead for change. In order to evoke this change Chavez must alter the way his audience thinks. He prods at their emotions by bringing religion into his argument and relying on the people's faith to change their thinking, he states

Read More

More about How Does Cesar Chavez Justify The Civil Rights Movement

Open Document