Commemorating the ten-year anniversary of the assassination of civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, Cesar Chavez addressed a religious organization through an article he published within their magazine. A peaceful protestor of civil rights, Chavez justifies his organization’s actions by contrasting nonviolent protest tactics with violent ones as well as providing the differing effects of each. Cesar Chavez attempts to gain the respect of this helpful organization, so its members will identify with his movement. Desperate to obtain the approval of this organization, Chavez defines nonviolent protesting and believes it naturally gains the respect of outsiders. Admittedly, Cesar Chavez declares his preference for nonviolence, “Nonviolence …show more content…
To predict the outcomes, Chavez declares what would happen if his group resorted to violence, “Either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers.” Chavez paints the explicit picture of these results to contrast with those of his movement. Correspondingly, Chavez portrays his organization as a plausible alternative to retaliate against injustices. Cesar Chavez assures the religious readers of his article that his actions are justifiable, and that supporting his movement would be a judicious decision on their behalf. To put it differently, Chavez interprets the consequence of violence within an activist campaign, “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached.” Assuming his establishment would achieve their objective, Chavez discloses that it would be intertwined with devastations. Comparatively, Chavez proposes that his behavior is undoubtedly modest when compared to such extremes. Cesar Chavez satisfies his audience with his civil rights movement by inferring its justness. Conspicuously, Chavez imposes a grotesque ending, “Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” Apprehensive of his audience’s compulsion towards helping those in need, Cesar Chavez illustrates the