As Epilogue, death is either non-existence or the next step in the journey. Socrates looks forward to the afterlife when he might examine the wisdom of the gods themselves and other noteworthy men from the past. Crito bids Socrates escape from prison. In addition, he has prepared a way, it will be easy and not even put anyone at risk and Socrates would have plenty of places to go if he chooses exile. If Crito doesn’t help Socrates to escape then people will think Crito didn’t care enough to help. Socrates would be abandoning his children if he lets himself be killed. In the situation, only consideration Socrates should make is whether or not it would be right to escape. therefore, Socrates ends up saying that ends don't justify means and one should abide by one's agreement. Argument of the laws of Athens was that since Socrates has chosen to live in Athens, he is bound to live under the Athenian law. The Athenian law states that Socrates must abide by the judgments of the state, and submit to his execution. …show more content…
Socrates proposes to dine in the Prytaneum even after jury charged him with death penalty just to show how he valued his life. This shows that he compared himself with victorious Olympic athletes who portray success and perfection of life. People need to examine their lives and the world to understand the value of life, to avoid acting without reason. To get the destinations and set the goals, people should examine their lives. By facing the challenges, people will have a better understanding of meaningful life and will more believe in their faith and also to themselves. Those who examine their life, they get to decide paths, decide how long those paths will take and whether they are right or wrong. People also get to distinguish between bad actions and good