ipl-logo

How Does Dr. Myrick Use Of Utilitarianism

823 Words4 Pages

In the film called Extreme Measures, Dr. Myrick thought he could help paralyzed people by regrowing nerves and controlling their growth patterns. Except, Myrick needed human subjects to carry out the experiments because growth factors code to specific species. Most of the subjects would die and Dr. Myrick was aware of this fact. Myrick justified killing these people because the subjects would be dying for a good cause. If he was successful, millions of people would have been able to walk again. Even though Dr. Myrick wanted to save many people from being paralyzed, his research project and experiments were not ethical.
Using people for research and experiments without consent is wrong. In chapter one page 3 of The Elements of Moral Philosophy, …show more content…

Myrick’s idea that he would be able to help millions of people is utilitarian based. In the book The Right Thing to Do, on page 14 it explained the principle of utility is that we should do whatever will produce the most happiness for everyone. Utilitarianism is flawed because it can be used to justify an act like murder. In chapter 7 of The Elements of Philosophy, it described a situation where Sigmund Freud was ill and wanted his physician to euthanize him to put him out of his misery. Utilitarianists support the decision of the physician to intentionally kill Freud because it would create the most happiness. In this case, Dr. Myrick uses utilitarian idealism to justify killing homeless people for his research. Dr. Myrick believed using human subjects for his research project would help him find a cure for paralyzed people. If he were successful, this would bring happiness to millions of people. With the theory of utilitarianism Dr. Myrick should do whatever he needed to do to produce the most happiness for people everywhere. Even though Dr. Myrick’s actions would help many people, he harmed people in the process. The people that were taken off the streets would not be happy. They were not given a choice to die, and Dr. Myrick would intentionally kill them in the process of testing his research. Therefore, Dr. Myrick’s decision to take people and kill them for his research was not

Show More
Related
1037 Words | 5 Pages

Nobody wants to say that the good of many is unimportant when it comes to what they want out of fear of sounding selfish. But let’s be honest. Is it really okay to completely violate someone’s right to their own body just to help science? From all the good that came from this violation of rights many are tempted to say yes. From a utilitarian point of view where weighing the costs and benefits of alternative course of actions leads to a decision that maximizes the general benefit to the community and minimizes the impact and drawbacks to whoever may be involved, it seems almost like it is acceptable to say that the scientists did nothing wrong.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Before 1962, there were no laws or guidelines that doctors had to follow when taking and using human cells. Ruth Faden, director of Johns Hopkins University says, "It's a sad commentary on how the biomedical research community thought about research in the 50's, but it was not at all uncommon for physicians to conduct research on patients without their knowledge or consent" (Skloot, "Cells," 2001). The researchers were not trying to be immoral, but they did not see anything wrong with taking tissue samples without consent, as long as the patient was not hurt. During that era, the researchers would forget about the patient once they had obtained a cell sample. They did not think about the fact that when conducting experiments, the cells they were using came from actual people.

Read More
1334 Words | 6 Pages

Prisoners were tested on, “prisoners nationwide were being used for research of all kinds - from testing chemical warfare agents to determining how x-raying testicles affected sperm count” (Skloot 129). Some of the prisoners volunteered to be used as a test subject while many others did not. Southam injected cancerous cells into more than 600 people, mostly cancer patients to begin with, and proceeding with healthy patients to see if it would make a difference; “Since people with cancer seemed to reject the cells more slowly than the healthy people did, he thought that by timing the reaction rate, he might be able to find undiagnosed cases of cancer” (Skloot 130). However, the healthy patients were not aware of what Southam was injecting into their bodies, if the patients were to ask about what he was doing to them, he would say that he was testing them for cancer but in all reality he was injecting cancer into their bodies.

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

“The Article Exploitation of prisoners in clinical research: perceptions of study participants” written by Paul Christopher states “Given the history of and continued potential for prisoner exploitation, biomedical research should be permitted only if there is a strongly favorable benefit-risk ratio for the prisoner.” Even though Henrietta Lacks was not in a clinical trial she did not receive all the information from her Doctors which led to her downfall. This lack of information not only hurt her but it also hurt her family. The worst part yet Henrietta and her family were not the only ones who were lied to because Chester Southam not only used prisoners for research but he used hospitalized people. He told the patients that he was checking their immune system when in fact he was injecting them with HeLa cells.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

“In 1999, president Clinton’s National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) issued a report saying that federal oversight of tissue research is “inadequate” and “ambiguous”. It recommended specific changes that would ensure patients’ rights to control how their tissues were being used.” (page 327). Unfortunately, the changes were never made and scientists still have the ability to conduct research on one’s tissues without consent. The reason for why the changes were nullified remain unknown even to Wayne Grody an individual “who was in thick of the debate in the nineties, (for) why the congressional recommendations and NBAC report seemed to have vanished.”.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Is it right for one's life to be manipulated for the use of scientific research or is it just a evasion on the person's privacy. Henrietta Lacks was a African American with cells that intrigued many people, she was diagnosed with cancer leaving her to be cared for at her local hospital, where she would later die due to the extremity of the illness. While at the hospital she was unaware that the doctors there were experimenting on her taking cell samples from her body, to help find a resolution to multiple diseases. The people who examined Henrietta manipulated her and the rest of her family to gain information on her cellular structure to be ahead of others looking to achieve the same objective. Henrietta Lacks cells should have never been evaluated because it's an evasion of her freedom, a danger to her personal health, and cause conflicts.

Read More
1459 Words | 6 Pages

Patient care is based around the individual- their best interest, treatment, and health concerns. Research is based around furthering knowledge within the medical world, by testing on people, and improving lives for future patients. In Henrietta’s case, she went to John Hopkins with the plan of being treated as a patient only, and was used for research, without education or consent. Making only a small effort to relieve her pain through radiation treatment, the physicians removed cells from Henrietta’s cervix to use in later studies. There is another line blurred, as Spigner, a University of Washington professor makes a point, stating, “The life and death of Henrietta Lacks is a cautionary tale that reflects the inherent contradiction between the stated purpose of medical research to provide benefit to humankind and the reality of blatant profiteering in the name of the advancement of science” (12).

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

Charles Neumann is a very negligent man when it came to his experiments bad he completely ignored the ethical. Charles was not limited to the experiments he could do unless Cassandra Cautery, who is a middle manager, halts him. One example when he ignored these boundaries is when he cut off his second leg. He could have simply worked on making better legs on a different animal such as a dog, or simply just improve his one prosthetic leg. Not only does it cost “Better Future” money, it could cause them shut down.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

In this case, the informed consent of the subjects was not fully attained as researchers used misinformation to encourage participation in otherwise detrimental studies. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, author Rebecca Skloot references a similar case in which a researcher named Chester Southam injected prisoners with cancer cells. Like researchers in the Tuskegee experiments, Southam did not thoroughly explain his research “[as] patients might have refused to participate in his study if they’d known what he was injecting” (Skloot 13). In addition to promoting ethical research, informed consent strengthens the trust between researchers and donors. When researchers seek permission before experimenting on biospecimen, they remain trustable figures to donors.

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Which is the process to use any part of someone’s body. Even though it was something that help a lot of people it was done unethical. In conclusion to the ethical theories, the Utilitarianism and deontology is on two different sides of the fence. While one is applauding the doctor and believe that it is ethical, the other believes following the rules and believes that it is unethical. Based on the story and the time frame, this experiment was ethical and the right thing to

Read More
1205 Words | 5 Pages

According to the Belmont Report, “Two general rules have been formulated … (1) do not harm and (2) maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms… an agreement to participate in research constitutes a valid consent only if voluntarily given. This element of informed consent requires conditions free of coercion and undue influence” (“The Belmont Report”). In relation to Eleven, Dr. Brenner maximized harm and there were no benefits. Instead, they caused her psychological trauma and torture by submerging her into the sensory deprivation tanks and forcing her to make contact with a creature that she was terrified of. Also, they tried to force her to kill an animal and tried to lock her in a cell.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

This was a very unfortunate situation, because these slave did not have the right to reject this treatment. In particular, many female slaves were used in reproductive research. The pain that these slaves experienced was not of concern to doctors. Slaves were dehumanized and treated like animals. Thus, this medical practice was considered ethical.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

If you have been searching for a Barbie under 5 dollars for your child or as a present for someone else, then you have found the right place. We offer low price Barbie dolls and accessories right here that will fit nicely in your budget! We all have a little girl that loves to play with Barbie. It’s always a good gift for a child, especially when you can never have too many Barbie dolls!

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Doctor Myrick uses the principle of utility to defend his immoral actions during the film. The principle of utility is when a person makes a choice that is best for the most amount of people involved in the situation. He uses this tenet when talking to doctor Luthan about the ethical ideas involved in his experiment, because it will save millions despite killing the test subjects that are held beyond their will. In the movie we see signs of hedonism through doctor Myricks actions. His hedonistic views are seen as he tries to find pleasure in the horrible disease of paralysis.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

Contagion, a film released in 2011, is a great example of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a theory that promotes the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The movie’s strength lies with the characters and the way they portray a utilitarian view. In this film, many doctors and experts in disease control are desperately looking for a cure for an unknown disease that has spread through the world killing hundreds of thousands of people. Knowing that the virus could potentially kill off the entire population of the world, the CDC and its employees worked day and night for months and months to come up with a vaccination to health the vast majority of the population.

Read More

More about How Does Dr. Myrick Use Of Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document