Through Utopia, More provide the leaders of his time with knee insight help improve his world by claiming that leaders should not put their own self-interest over their people. In Utopia, Sir Thomas More wrote, “When a ruler enjoys wealth and pleasure while all about him are grieving and groaning, he acts as a jailor rather than as a king.” More meant that It’s not morally correct to enjoy the best pleasure of the world while your people are suffering or are poor. When a leader keeps his people in poverty he acts like a person guade. He’s keeping them where he wants them. More’s point was that it’s not right for a leader to maintain their people in poverty while they are enjoy all the top pressures of the world. It’s also not correct for a leader to keep his people in poverty to manipulate them as …show more content…
In Utopia, Sir Thomas More wrote, “Certainly it is wrong to think that the poverty is a safeguard of public peace.” More meant that a leader should not use poverty as a mean to control crime and keep their people save. Having people dependent on a leader or govern for their own existent can lead to more crime. Poverty, those who have less are more likely to commit crime because they have less loose and more to gain, so poverty is not helping to stop crime. When people are dependent on their leader for their own existent and need its helps keep the people under the control of the leader. It gives the leader the power to manipulate as he needs because people needs him to survive. More’s point was that it’s not morally correct for a leader to control and manipulate their people by having them suffering in poverty. Also When a leader keeps their people in poverty it can cause the rise of more crime. Definitely, More claimed in Utopia that leaders should not use poverty as a mean to control their