How Does Priestley Create Tension In An Inspector Calls

978 Words4 Pages

As a result of the Birlings' capitalist viewpoint, Priestley clearly shows the disparity between the upper and lower classes in An Inspector Calls, which leads to Eva Smith's tragic suicide as a result of the Birlings' capitalist viewpoint on life. There is no doubt that Priestley focused on the patriarchal nature of British society at the time, doing so to emphasise the need for change to take place in Britain, especially for families like the Birlings, who are represented by Priestley's work. At the start of the play Priestley highlights the Birlings' desire to portray their lives as "pink and intimate," an idealised vision of what life should be like. Essentially, what Priestley is trying to convey is that he wants the audience to overlook …show more content…

The family's flaws and the fact that they are not really who they seem to be are brought to the attention of the audience by the "brighter," "harder" light, which acts as a spotlight. The light also underlines the look of a police interrogation lamp, demonstrating that the Inspector's goals are to ensure that the family admits their mistakes and takes responsibility for their actions as well as to voice Priestley's own socialist opinions. Additionally, Priestley is trying to highlight the flaws in capitalism and the advantages of …show more content…

The fact that Sheila is described as "a lively good-looking girl" and is "twenty-four" years old, just like Eva, is also significant. Only class and money separate Eva and Sheila, who are both young, attractive, and vivacious. This is a deliberate choice by Priestley to show how what happened to Eva could have happened to Sheila if she had no money—something he believes to be abhorrently unfair. Eric comments to his parents that they are "starting to pretend now that nothing's really happened at all" at the conclusion of the play after the Inspector departs. and Shelia confirms this, attesting to the fact that they are "just starting to pretend all over again." In this case, it is conceivable that Priestley's use of time in the play was influenced by the theories of Piotr Ouspensky. According to Ouspensky, after we pass away, we begin our lives over again. The same parents give birth to us again, and the same things happen in our lives over and over again. If we didn't make any significant changes, we would continue living identical lives. He is demonstrating to us throughout the play that people like the Birlings are content to continue existing within the same destructive cycle of egotistical greed in which they