ipl-logo

How Does Texting Affect Literacy

696 Words3 Pages

Texting is the use of abbreviations and other language techniques to create text and instant messages. This shorthand communication method does not always follow the standard rules of English grammar, as well as normal word spelling. Texting is now referred to by some its own, new language. Ever since instant messaging became a world wide trend, teachers and parents all over the world blame texting for two things; the corruption of language, as well as decomposition of spelling skills for young kids. In general, texting has created a very strong and negative response from educators and parents. However, does texting really affect the literacy of teens and children? MXit is a trending mobile instant messaging service, that has over 10 million registered users, most users happen to be under the age of 18, who send on average 250 million messages every day.1 Even though teens and children are writing more than ever, most people don’t consider …show more content…

However some language teachers are refusing the ban mobile phones, because they too see that while texting can have its negative side, its benefits over rule this. Some teachers are now recognizing texting as :a new form of communication is taking charge of the linguistic sphere.” While some teachers are accepting this form of language they do admit it is going to create more challenges for teaching and learning as well as new opportunities.” 2 When textisms appear in formal assignments, it provides an opportunity to bring up this issue in a classroom setting to allow students to voice their opinion on this growing controversy. There is nothing new about the roles teachers play in correcting mistakes as well as preventing them in formal writing, however it has now been proven that texting and instant messaging cannot be at fault for these specific

Show More
Related
97 Words | 1 Pages

An essay titled "does Texting Affect Writing?" was published by Michaela Cullington while she studied to gain her masters degree in speech and language pathology at Marywood University. In her essay she claims that texting and texting language neither benefits or harms a students academic writing. Michaela Cullington asserts that a conspiracy has been going around concerning how texting can limit a students writing ability in ways such as not being able to convey emotion in writing, forgetting how to write a formal English paper and use correct punctuation, and most of all a decline in spelling.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American University, believes that texting is harming students writing. She states, “So much of American society has become sloppy and laissez faire about the mechanics of writing” (131). The author used this quote to drawl in the teachers who believe texting is harming students writing. Cullington goal is to make them continue reading and learn how she believes texting is actually beneficial. By putting the opposing view point of texting affecting writing in the beginning, is confusing to the target audience.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

Today, texting has become the most widely used communication technique for teenagers and young adults. It is written in completely informal language and it has no literature value in it. Although the critics believe texting is destroying literature value, McWhorter has another opinion in mind. McWhorter thinks that texting is another form of language that is developed by teenagers. It is the creation of a brand new language evolving from the old literature.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction Love it or hate it, texting is constant facet of today’s society. Texting is usually consider the bane of all English teachers out there. Everywhere, English teachers complain that texting lower’s the child’s English skills, that cheating is running amuck, and texting is causing grammar and spelling errors every turn. Throughout “TXTing: h8 or luv it,” Courtney Anttila targets the common English teacher’s concern on texting, and providing a positive spin to texting.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

This, along with her own anecdotal experience, lead her to the conclusion that texting is not something to be afraid of by teachers because it does not harm students' writing abilities. The abbreviations have the purpose of speeding up the process of typing, and as long as expecatations about writing assignments are clear there would be no

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Cullington after summarizing her research and having said both sides of opinions about texting affecting writing, she used the results as evidence of why Cullington disagreed that texting has no effect in writing. “On the basis of my own research, experts research, and personal observations, I can confidently state that texting is not interfering with student’s use of standards written English…” (Cullington 370). As you can see she used the strategy of disagreeing but with an explanation and summarized what her discoveries were. Cullington also agreed that texting is used on an everyday basis and at every moment that is possible. To agree to this Cullington included her own personal experience as a reference that texting effectively is used anywhere at any

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

In her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Not So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.

Read More
130 Words | 1 Pages

1. Grantwriters have clearly defined needs along with describing how those needs were identified and how they will be resolved. 2. Grantwriters give something back. They are not selfish with there their request and show the benefits for others.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Katie Hafner’s article “Texting May Be Taking a Toll” divulges that texting is becoming a major issue among teens, leaving parents and teachers struggling to find ways to keep up and get it under control. The article begins by proposing that teenagers are texting more and more often and it could be taking a toll on their health; sleep deprivation, stress injuries, failing grades, and many more. The author illustrated this by saying “...it is leading to anxiety, distraction in school, falling grades, repetitive stress injury and sleep deprivation,” (1). This quote specifies that kids are more focused on their phones and the text messages they are receiving, then they are on their classes, grades, getting adequate amounts of sleep and their

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Not So Fast”, conducts her own study with a few colleagues to take notes on how students writing skills are changing. She decides to conduct another one twenty five years later to see how much the writing skills have changed since technology has been updated and became more available to students. She found that “students today are writing more than ever before.” Although we still have the same amount of writing errors as before, the patterns of errors are different. Many people argue that technology is only making our writing skill worse, this study helps to prove a different theory.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

Both Aunt Misery and the the old couple "The Crane Maiden" face a situation in which they both have too lose some thing in there life. I will explain the what are the compare and contrast, the differences and the same thing. This is a essay about compare and contrast about two story's. They must let go of some one or some thing they love very much they both wish not to let go of the thing or person they have to let go off.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Rubinkam’s Texting in Class is Rampant explains how most highschool and college students use their phones during class and lectures. Rubinkam reports that , “The anonymous survey of 269 Wilkes students found that nine in 10 admit to sending text messages during class-and nearly half say it's easy to do so undetected. Even more troubling, 10 percent say that they have sent or received texts during exams and 3 percent admit to using their phones to cheat.” Rubinkam uses logos to show how many students use their phones during class. The amount of students that do is frightening to most teachers because most teachers do not even notice it.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Teachers don't want kids’ texting in class when they're trying to teach them important things. We should not bring cell phones in class because it can affect to their listening skills, first, it destruct students from the lessons, the students will keep texting and texting because the students is addicting of cell phones and they will never understand what is the lesson about. Second, the students could cheat on test; we all know that our society is more in high technology. There is Wi-Fi’s everywhere and also there are pocket Wi-Fi’s, broad bands, and load data’s that can use in surfing the net. So, if they take the test they can use their cell phones and cheat on the test.

Read More

More about How Does Texting Affect Literacy

Related Topics

Open Document