In the aftermath of the first World War, there were many artist clambering to find their place in the post-war society; many artists focused on finding the solution to fix the atrocities that emerged as a result of one of the most horrific global tragedies of modern culture and society. The Surrealist’s called for a total revolutionary rehaul of society by unlocking the subconscious mind they believed to be hindered by the bourgeoisie-directed conscious mind (Foster et al, 190). Alternatively, arising creators from the Bauhaus school of arts embraced the bourgeoisie aspects of mass-production by reinventing modern everyday models to be more efficient, and creating new designs to make life easier. Both of those movements ideologies are identifiable …show more content…
Oppenheim turns the familiar into the uncanny by synthesizing two objects that lack shared properties into a singular object. Oppenheim plays into society's general consensus that the combination of food and hair is repulsive when associated with each other. This piece perfectly into the Surrealists confrontation of modern society, making the viewer question why society finds the concept of food and hair infused together disgusting. The point of Surrealist art was such; to make the viewer self-reflect on the mundanity of the world. However, Marianne Brandt’s Silver Tea Set, 1924 is a result of the emerging Bauhaus school of art. The streamlined design of the teapot, and its metallic shine resemble something of that of a machine despite being handmade by Brandt. It gives the viewers of the piece a sense of efficiency and the new-found modernity of post-war Europe. Contrasting to Oppenheim’s piece, this tea set makes the viewer not uncomfortable at the thought of using it for food consumption. This reinvention of the tea set aligns with the Bauhaus’s desire for an improval of everyday models. The Bauhaus school wanted the audience to want to buy this and use it, as their goal was to make objects easily mass