Philosophy is a subject that breaks down every aspect of our beliefs. From how we think to is time actually real, these questions have all been asked and or even thought about by everyone at least once. One of the philosophers I’ve found interesting do far during this course is Immanuel Kant who I read about in chapter five. Kant’s views on the mind and if it shapes the world made me question a lot of things when he expressed his views on phenomenalism, stating that “the world that our minds construct, and that appears to be around us, the phenomenal world. The world as it might be in itself, apart from our mind, he called the noumenal world” (P.359). Implying that, we can be said to know things in regards to the world, not on the grounds …show more content…
Reason gives the structure or type of what we know, the faculties give the substance. In the event that we are restricted to marvels meaning, things as they show up, it is possible that we will never know whether our thoughts are valid or we need to reclassify what truth is. In the event that Kant is correct, then why do societies appear to contrast on the classifications of comprehension? One conceivable is that despite the fact that the classifications appear to shift, such contrasts are because of contrasts in the "surface punctuation" of dialect, the routes in which things are comprehended as significant. At the point when inquired as to why dialects are organized in certain ways, a few scholars assert that the mind and our neural systems shape the "profound language structure" of what things mean. Kant's answer implies that we will never know whether our thoughts regarding the world are valid, or it implies that we need to reclassify reality as that which we encounter instead of that which experience speaks to. Another logic hypothesis that got my consideration was the women's activist religious philosophy. I delighted in perusing about how they put and taught everything in a lady's point of view, presenting to all of them as one.