ipl-logo

Immanuel Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

814 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Kant's universal law formulation

Every year, hurricane season starts on the first of June. Although we are going about our everyday lives, I hope most people ask themselves if they have a moral to help hurricane victims. Immanuel Kant give us two rules that he uses to evaluate moral situations. He uses the formula of Universal Law and the formula of humanity. The formula of universal law essentially says for people to act in a way that would be acceptable if others do the same. It tells people not to make an exception of themselves and to avoid contradictions. The formula of humanity tells people to respect the inherent dignity and worth in themselves and in other people. Using these two rules, Kant would say that the maxim could be if a person does not want to help others, then they do not. If this action were to …show more content…

Naturally, pleasure is associated with being good and is desired by most. Pain, on the other hand, is generally associated with being bad and is avoided. The principle looks at how an action can create the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure and the least amount of pain for the greatest number. The principle states “the greatest number” so that there is an inclusion for nonhuman animals. Mill would first list the people who would be affected and the list varies but essential has the people helping and the ones being helped. There is not too many consequences that occur to the one that could help the victim, but the ones needing the help are continuing to suffer from the effect of hurricanes. People are not causing pain by not helping hurricane victims, but they are not creating pleasure either. If people do decide to help the victims, then they alleviate much pain and create much pleasure. Mill would also say that this way for evaluating moral situations are not perfect, but it is relatable to how people think every day and helps people understand what are the consequences to our

Show More
Related
672 Words | 3 Pages

This paradox is obviously what distresses the speaker most; humans don’t deserve pain or pleasure, but they will continue receiving both whether they deserve it or

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

He also stresses that we should do everything in our power to prevent bad things from happening whether it is to other or to situations like fixing a town people once lived in. With that being said he knew that not everyone would be as helpful as others and that they would use the excuse of not being able to give as much as that other person, and if that person is not helping then why should they. He then came up with a conclusion of giving just enough to prevent more suffering.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

It proves that Mill thinks pleasure is good and pain is bad for everybody, people should spread the happiness

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

Thomas Hobbes argued that, instead of an altruistic approach, we do deeds out of charity, and it is a demonstration of power. If we help others, we show people that we are more resourceful than others. Another one is pity. We pity others because we imagine ourselves in their place. Helping others is actually a fear of how we might end up, and if we help them, they will help us in return when the times comes.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

Long-Tail Nanotargeting - Tom Tancredo’s Online Ad Buys Earned an Unbelievable Return on Investment... Since Pat Caddell introduced message polling, the winning model for most down- ballot campaigns has been a one-size-fits- all message: Promote your candidate to his/ her best attributes, the opponent to his/her worst op-research line items, and then hammer home the message—usually on TV an mailers. But this model came from a time when the media audience was easy to find, segment and reach. The biggest problem? One-dimensionality. For years, people have been saying the Internet is a game changer.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Thus, it is not one’s intentions that matter, so much as the goodness that comes out of it. We should not judge people for doing kind acts out of selfishness, but focus more on the good that comes out of their

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

The universal law comes from our own rational assent willingly, not from the outside. If you obey the moral law out of fear we are no longer acting out of free will because our reasons are partial and pragmatic. I agree with this idea because every person has a moral dignity. Everybody has some good in them, whether they use it not.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

There are different internal compasses that people utilize to point them towards the path of morality. The most common that probably still remains is The Golden Rule also referred to as the ethic of reciprocity. The Golden Rule stands for: “Treat others the way you want to be treated”. Some consider the Golden Rule to be the most universal of moral principles. Yet it does not always send a positive message.

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

Kant basic rule or idea is that we have a duty to do that which is right; and that if we want to determine whether or not an action is morally acceptable, all we need to do is consider whether or not it makes sense for us to recommend to everybody should do whatever we are considering. Kant argues and gives circumstances that may lead one to desire to promise to do something he really has no intention of doing. So, he considers whether it would be acceptable as a law for everyone to make promises that they have no intention of keeping. Considering the result that promises would be completely void of meaning, Kant sees that lying can't be a law, and so, cannot be morally condoned. That's one of Kant’s main points of his rule.

Read More
2076 Words | 9 Pages

The way singer explains this principle is through a utilitarian prospective, suggesting two viewpoints, Jeremy Bentham says “interest of every being affected by an action are to be taken into account and given the same weight as the like interests of any other being. ”(3) The second utilitarian, Henry Sidgwick, says “ the good of any one individual is of no more importance, from the point of view (if I may say so) of the Universe, than the good of any other. ”(3) Singer explains in these principles an aspect of achieving happiness and avoid pain.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

The formulation of Kant’s categorical Imperative is the act of your maxim, were a universal law of nature. Kant said that the maxim should be suggested that we think of wills of maxims, or rules for action, and then we judge those maxims in terms of whether everyone could act on them (page 841). Kant says, I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law (page 841). By which he means we should have a direction for how we should know how to behave in a certain situation. One such maxim can be we should keep our agreement or moral ethical ways when we make them.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Here different kinds of opinions come from different people, because everyone takes the reality of suffering in a different way. But those who realize their own actions and takes efforts to change, suffering leads to betterment. “The fact of moral evil is basically explained as necessary for the greater good of free will. The range of moral evil is mainly explained by reference to the greater good of the responsibility.”

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The dignity of man consists in the ability to make a universal law that he himself must obey. And man formulates the universal law by means of reason.” Kant concludes that the principle of morality is a moral law capable of universalization and created through reason, guiding us to the virtuous action in any circumstance. Further, he concludes that virtue comes from good will. Therefore, I am permitted to conclude that a person could perform non-virtuous acts on many occasions but still be considered virtuous when performing virtuous acts.

Read More
1969 Words | 8 Pages

Kant and the Lying Promise In “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, Kant explores the subject of duty and the binding force of morality. Kant explores the morality of among many cases, this paper being focused particularly on the case of the lying promise. To determine the morality of such action, Kant provides the Formula of Universal Law, which relies on a maxim passing four steps in order to be considered moral.

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More

More about Immanuel Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

Related Topics

Open Document