Impartial Jury System Analysis

The United States selected an impartial jury system based on the Magna Carta that was originated in England in the 1400s. The colonists brought the jury system with them from Great Britain. The jury gave citizens power to go against what the king wanted in court. The king then established a special court system that only allowed royal judges made the decisions. The colonists listed this is a reason to separate from England in the Declaration of Independence. The US Constitution gives American the right to a criminal trial by jury, and the Bill of Rights gives us the right to impartial jury in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. To truly be impartial jury and avoid biased decisions. The jury of twelve ordinary citizens swarms to solely

They must decide whether an accused or defendant individual is guilty or not guilty of any charged crimes. While they examine all the evidence at trial and decide the defendant’s fate, the jurors must remain impartial and free of bias. Since having an impartial jury is crucial to having a fair trial, a defendant has the right to have a jury pool that’s composed of a fair cross-section of the community. A jury pool is a collection of potential jurors assembled together for jury duty.A jury for a criminal trial is chosen from the jury pool. The court and the attorneys can question the potential jurors and can challenge anyone that seems to have possible or actual bias. A challenge is a request to disqualify an individual from the jury. The ultimate goal is to end up with a jury pool that’s representative of the community, and a jury that’s fair and impartial. In the text “Exclusion of Blacks From Juries Raises Renewed Scrutiny” by Adam Liptak states that in 2012, a state judge in North Carolina found out that a prosecutor in his state created a cheat sheet of race neutral reasons to offer when challenged. Also, of the 8,318 potential jurors in the study, which reviewed 332 trials from 2012 to 2013 only 35 percent were