ipl-logo

Importance Of Violence Needed To End World War II

613 Words3 Pages

Is the need of even more violence needed to stop a war? Although some people may think so, there’s already enough violence in wars, adding even more of that violence may make things worse which that is usually the case. When the U.S was at war with Japan things got very tense, it got to the point where Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. The U.S decided to strike back in a very merciless way. This war was needed to be put to an end therefore the United States decided to drop a nuclear bomb in the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The event happened on August 6 and 9, in the year 1945. I don’t believe that this was the correct way to end the war, innocent people died and radiation was still affecting the area even after it all happened. Although it was an effective way to end the war there is other ways the two countries could have come to an agreement so such violence wouldn’t be needed. If Japan had decided to strike back things could have gotten really dreadful but luckily it didn’t. Also, there is enough violence and death in war whether it’s small or big, there’s no need to bring more to the table. …show more content…

For the reason that Japan decided to surrender was why World War II ended. However, it’s good that it ended the war but there were at least 129,000 people dead. The ones who died were mostly civilians and it’ll be an event everyone will remember, a immoral one. People had died for the reason that the nuclear bombings had left a lot of radiations. People died from injuries like burns, and radiation sickness. Therefore, now the city is starting to get natural life back and civilian trying to live where the nuclear bombed was dropped after many years

Show More
Related
636 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the U.S. made history with a fatal blow to the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII. To this day there is a controversy on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb, ordered by President Harry S. Truman, was justified or not, but in fact, it was. Thousands of Japanese would perish, but this act would, in turn, saved American lives and end the war. Throughout various battles, the Japanese consistently crossed lines of ethics of warfare, and in an attempt to bring justice and an end to the war Truman put forth a plan to bomb Japan. President Truman warned Japan of the upcoming attack and gave demands, but in the end, the Japanese denied those negotiations which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Even though dropping the bomb on Japan was controversial it was the only way to end this war. Following, like what Justice Chamber said: “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?”(Doc 3), Japan was different than any other country that US faced because Japan committed inhuman and selfless actions just to kill more US

Read More
1963 Words | 8 Pages

The Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

In the United States, it is often taught that the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the deciding factor for the Japanese to surrender during World War II. However, upon closer inspection that may not be the reason why. For example, by the time both cities were destroyed Japan had already lost dozens of cities to American fire bombs and conventional raids. As a result, the only difference between the cities that were previously burned and Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the type of weapon used. Therefore,the Japanese government was aware and accustomed to loosing cities and large number of civilian lives.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Which in this case yes it is mightier and just, those using violence towards their fellow country men only sparks more dangerous conflicts.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

It also had long lasting effects that still impact Japanese lives. In the newspaper by Jack Doherty headlined ¨Atomic Bomb Fury Hits Japan¨ after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the president said, ¨It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction.¨ Yet, look where it has gone and how much damage it had cost Japan. I encourage you to not listen to these statements as if they were true, and right the wrongs the atomic bombs have done to Japan by unjustifying the act and telling others to do so as

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Many people suggested that potentially fixing the problems through peace should be gotten rid of, and violence should be the only

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

During the 1930s, fascism was spreading across Europe leading to authoritarian governments such as Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire. The war with Japan was still going on at the time of Germany’s surrender. The United States made the bold decision on August 6th and 9th, 1945 to drop an atomic on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in an attempt to end the war. The dropping of the bomb led to approximately 200,000 deaths in Japan, but shortly after the Japanese announced their surrender. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima during August 1945, although inhumane, was necessary to end World War II because of the increased Japanese aggression during the war, their refusal to make peace with the Allies, and using

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

This is an event many Americans felt was necessary to end the war with a country that would fight till death to bring honor. However, many Japanese people felt this was a needless war crime that resulted in deaths of innocent civilians. It is much easier for Americans to relay this event as a factual occurrence, but to those still feeling and have felt the

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

In the article “Why We Did It” ,it stated that people wanted the war to end (“Why We Did It”, 1995). People were tired of the sacrifice of the army. For better understanding imagine that someone has not seen their friend for a long time because they are fighting a war and they want to see them again and are tired of the war with Japan and just wants this battle to stop. Many people have felt exhausted from the long lasting wars being fought and wanted it to end. Soon the atomic bomb was the solution to end this.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

However, the Japanese were committed to fight to the bitter end of the war and see it all the way through, regardless of the fact that the United States demanded unconditional surrender from the small country of islands. This further emphasizes that since the Japanese were not simply going to give up, Truman came to the conclusion that in order to save millions of lives, he had to take thousands. President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Japan to warn the world about the new found power of the United States, force an unconditional surrender of the Japanese, and save millions of lives. With the controversy over whether or not Truman should have dropped the bomb, some consider the decision irrational and unnecessary.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

More about Importance Of Violence Needed To End World War II

Related Topics

Open Document