In the article “Your Princess Is In Another Castle: Misogny, Entitlement, and Nerds” by Arthur Chu, Chu sheds light on the harsh reality of tropes in games, shows, and movies can change someone’s perspective in the real world. In the article, he is responding to this stereotype that oh, in order to get the girl you have to “win” her. Especially if the girl is way out of their league. Historically, it was always this way. Steve Urkel for example has been chasing Laura Winslow all his youth to teen age yours. Buying her flowers, complimenting her everyday, trying to show her affection, etc until he finally “won” her and she gave him a shot. While women were having sort of an uprising saying ''we aren’t objects we don’t need to be won in video games''. He hits them with …show more content…
It's either you want the gorgeous popular girl or you're not a nerd. In the beginning of the article he uses ethos to show us he is really a nerd. Chu says how he watched "The Big Bang Theory", went on Jeopardy, and auditioned for "King of Nerds". The Big Bang Theory is actually a pretty good show so I kind of felt sort of a connection because we watch a similar show. I am no expert but you cannot go on Jeopardy or King Of Nerds if you aren't a "nerd". Chu even talked about "Revenge of the Nerds" and says" But look. One of the major plot points of Revenge of the Nerds is Lewis putting on a Darth Vader mask, pretending to be his jock nemesis Stan, and then having sex with Stan’s girlfriend. Initially shocked when she finds out his true identity, she’s so taken by his sexual prowess— “All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.”—that the two of them become an item". Only a nerd would love that specific part. Chu made me want to watch this movie. Another example of a Black and White fallacy is when the article says, "I was going to write about The Big Bang Theory—why, as a nerdy viewer, I sometimes like it and sometimes have a problem with it, why I think there’s a backlash against